Nakhleh, Raouf

AbstractBackgroundAmyloidosis is a systemic disorder of abnormal protein folding and deposition resulting in a range of symptoms including neuropathy, heart failure, renal disease, and dermatologic findings. The two most common types of amyloidosis that affect the heart are transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis and light chain (AL) amyloidosis, which vary in clinical presentation. Skin findings such as periorbital purpura are considered more specific for AL amyloidosis. However, there are rare cases of ATTR amyloidosis causing the same dermatologic findings.Case SummaryA 69-year-old female presented for evaluation of amyloidosis after cardiac imaging done at the time of a recent atrial fibrillation ablation showed signs of infiltrative disease. On examination, she had periorbital purpura which she reportedly had for years without receiving a diagnosis, as well as macroglossia with teeth indentation. These exam findings, in addition to her transthoracic echocardiogram showing apical sparing, are typically considered characteristic of AL amyloidosis. Subsequent workup revealed the presence of hereditary ATTR (hATTR) amyloidosis with a heterozygous pathogenic variant in the TTR gene producing the p.Thr80Ala mutation.ConclusionSpontaneous periorbital purpura is thought to be pathognomonic for AL amyloidosis. However, we describe a case of hereditary ATTR amyloidosis with the Thr80Ala TTR genetic variant presenting initially with periorbital purpura, the first case documented in the literature to our knowledge.

Although hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become a common indication for liver transplantation (LT), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and combined hepatocellular carcinoma–cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC‐CCA) are historically contraindicated due to their aggressive behavior. On the basis of recent experiences, some groups have proposed a clinical trial investigating the role of LT for patients with early cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), defined as a single lesion ≤ 2 cm. The purpose of this study is to assess the clinicopathologic features and outcomes following LT for patients who were initially diagnosed with HCC and subsequently found to have either ICC or cHCC‐CCA on explant. Patients with the diagnosis of primary liver cancer (PLC) after LT from a single center were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes for patients with early CCA were compared with patients with HCC within Milan criteria (MC). Out of 618 patients transplanted with PLC, 44 patients were found to have CCA on explant. On the basis of preoperative imaging, 12 patients met criteria for early CCA and were compared with 319 patients who had HCC within MC. The 1‐ and 5‐year overall survival for early CCA versus HCC was 63.6% versus 90.0% and 63.6% versus 70.3% (log‐rank, P = 0.25), respectively. Overall recurrence was 33.3% for early CCA versus 11% for HCC. On explant the patients with CCA were more likely understaged with higher tumor grade and vascular invasion. In conclusion, patients with CCA present a diagnostic challenge, which often leads to the finding of more aggressive lesions on explant after LT, higher recurrence rates, and worse post‐LT survival. Careful consideration of this diagnostic conundrum needs to be made before a clinical trial is undertaken. Liver Transplantation 24 634–644 2018 AASLD.