Haller, Travis

AbstractObjectiveComprehensively assess the prevalence of monopolar electrosurgery‐related device complications among cochlear implant (CI) recipients.Study DesignMultifaceted retrospective review and survey.SettingTertiary medical center.MethodsMultifaceted approach including: (i) review of the current literature; (ii) historical review of institutional data from an academic, tertiary CI center; (iii) review of industry data provided by 3 Food and Drug Administration‐approved CI manufacturers; and (iv) survey of high‐volume CI centers.ResultsLiterature review identified 9 human studies, detailing 84 devices with 199 episodes of device‐cautery exposure. From studies reporting on patients records, no implant showed evidence of damage after exposure. One cadaveric study using dental cautery reported 1 episode of device damage. Review of institutional records did not identify any CI damage in 84 instances of exposure. Data from the 3 major implant manufacturers showed a single report of damage that could be reasonably linked to monopolar electrosurgery, out of a possible 689,426 CIs. Last, a survey of 8 high‐volume CI centers did not identify any adverse events associated with monopolar cautery.ConclusionThese data estimate the risk of adverse device‐related events or tissue injury to be extraordinarily low. Short of operating in immediate proximity to the CI (ie, the ipsilateral temporoparietal scalp), these data indicate that monopolar electrosurgery can be used in the body and the head‐and‐neck of CI recipients with nominal risk. These findings may guide decision‐making in cases that are optimally or preferably performed with monopolar electrocautery and can be used to counsel CI patients following inadvertent exposures.

Objective Compare cochlear implant (CI) performance between patients with ipsilateral sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) and NF2-related schwannomatosis (NF2). Compare CI performance according to VS management modality. Study Design Historical cohort. Setting Tertiary academic center. Patients Forty-nine patients (52 ears) undergoing cochlear implantation in the setting of ipsilateral sporadic (n = 21) or NF2-associated VS (n = 28). Interventions CI ipsilateral to VS. Main Outcome Measures Auditory thresholds, consonant–nucleus–consonant (CNC) word scores, and AzBio sentences in quiet scores. Results Among all patients, median post-CI pure tone average was 28 dB HL (interquartile range [IQR], 21–38), CNC word score was 39% (IQR, 6–62), and AzBio sentences in quiet score was 60% (IQR, 11–83) at a median of 12.5 months postimplantation. Despite the NF2 cohort having larger tumors, when comparing patients with sporadic versus NF2-associated VS, there were no statistically significant differences in CNC word (49% [30–70] vs. 31% [0–52]) or AzBio sentences in quiet (66% [28–80] vs. 57% [5–83]) scores. Regardless of NF2 status, all patients managed with observation, and radiosurgery achieved open-set speech. In patients who underwent microsurgery, 6 (46%) of 13 with NF2 achieved open-set speech recognition compared with 4 (67%) of 6 with sporadic disease. Conclusion Select patients with VS achieve successful hearing rehabilitation with a CI. In this cohort, tumor management strategy significantly influenced CI performance, whereas differences in NF2 status exhibited less effect. Specifically, all patients managed with observation or radiosurgery achieved open-set speech perception, whereas approximately half of people with NF2-related VS and two-thirds of people with sporadic VS achieved this outcome after tumor microsurgery. When disease permits, observation and radiosurgery should be considered in patients who may later pursue a CI.

AbstractBackgroundWe aim to explore the prognostic role of absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) before, during, and after treatment on oncologic outcomes in human papillomavirus associated oropharyngeal cancer (HPV(+)OPSCC).MethodsRetrospective cohort at a tertiary center, 2006–2018. Multivariable Cox regressions were used to determine the effect of ALC on risk of progression. Univariate linear regression was performed to determine clinical factors associated with lower ALC.ResultsAll 197 patients underwent primary surgery. Mean (SD) ALC nadirs (×109 cells/L) were: baseline (N = 149): 1.69 (0.56); postoperative (N = 126): 1.58 (0.59); post‐RT (N = 141): 0.68 (0.35) and long‐term (N = 105): 0.88 (0.37). Lower baseline ALC nadir was associated with worse overall survival (HR 3.85, 95%CI: 1.03–14.29, p = 0.04). Lower postoperative ALC nadir was associated with higher risk of progression (HR 2.63, 95%CI: 1.04–6.67, p = 0.04).ConclusionsLower baseline ALC is associated with worse survival, whereas lower postoperative ALC is associated with increased risk of progression in surgically treated HPV(+)OPSCC.Level of Evidence3