Mauermann, Michelle L

Abstract Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are frequent in patients (pts) with systemic light chain amyloidosis (AL), yet their clinical significance remains poorly defined. We investigated the role of symptomatic GI involvement in disease burden, survival, and organ-specific outcomes in a large single-center cohort. Methods From 2010–2025, 4,396 AL pts were evaluated at our center; 560 pts (13%) had provider-attributed symptomatic GI AL. Pts with localized AL or positive biopsy without GI symptoms were excluded (n=38). We analyzed relationships between GI symptoms, anatomic/histologic involvement, laboratory parameters, survival, and need for nutritional support using Wilcoxon rank-sum, Chi-square, Kaplan-Meier, and logistic regression tests. Results GI symptoms included early satiety (n=320/57%), diarrhea (n=189/34%), nausea (n=184/33%), abdominal pain (n=148/26%), dysphagia (n=119/21%), vomiting (n=75/13%), GI bleeding (n=74/13%), and heartburn (n=71/13%). Only nausea and GI bleeding were not associated with cardiac (n=366/65%) renal (n=274/49%) or hepatic (n=84/15%) AL, whereas dysphagia, early satiety and heartburn were more frequent with cardiac (all OR=1.7), abdominal pain and diarrhea with hepatic (OR=2 and 1.6, respectively), and vomiting with renal involvement (OR=2; all p<0.04). Autonomic involvement impacted GI symptoms, often without proof of parenchymal GI amyloid. Of the 124 pts with formal autonomic testing, only 44 (35%) had positive GI biopsies as compared to AL GI pts without proven autonomic involvement (240/436, 55%). Pts with autonomic involvement were more symptomatic than pts with positive GI biopsies, suffering more often from dysphagia (29% vs 19%), diarrhea (41% vs 32%), and gastroparesis (34% vs 9%, all p<0.001). We screened changes in body weight, calcium, VitB12, Hb, PO4, and albumin at diagnosis. Of the 175 pts with documented weight loss in this cohort, pts with GI AL lost more weight compared to those with other organ involvement (21% vs 14% of weight, p=0.002), and had lower phosphate (3.7 vs 4.0 mg/dL, p=0.06). In our cohort of pts with GI symptoms, 298 (53%) had a positive GI biopsy. Biopsy-proven anatomic involvement dictated symptoms (all p<0.05): Of the 20 pts with positive esophageal biopsy, dysphagia was present in 45%; only 33% of the pts without an esophageal biopsy had dysphagia. Similar patterns were seen for the 170 pts with a positive gastric biopsy (n=170) in terms of heartburn (21% vs 11%), for the 165 pts with positive small bowel biopsies in terms of abdominal pain (68% vs 32%), and for the 130 pts with positive colon biopsies and diarrhea (46% vs 33%). Specific histopathological patterns were prognostic. Mucosal involvement (n=161) was an independent risk factor for survival compared to submucosal (n=64) and vascular (n=102) involvement throughout the GI tract (HR 1.83; p=0.03). Three-layer GI infiltration was associated with inferior mOS (2.4 vs 5.1 vs 7.8 y for 3 vs 2 vs 1-layer involvement, HR 3.19/1.56/1; p<0.05). Counterintuitively, vascular involvement had the lowest risk of bleeding in all GI anatomic sites (p=0.02). In the colon, only mucosal involvement was associated with a higher risk of bleeding (OR=5; p=0.04). GI involvement in AL pts did not worsen prognosis (mOS 10.0/6.3y, p=0.02), and pts with isolated GI AL (n=74/13%) had an even better survival (55% surviving at 10 y). Cachexia (n=120; mOS 3.5 vs 7.8 y, p<0.001), need for nutritional support (n=36; mOS 0.9 vs 7.0 y, p<0.001), and diarrhea (mOS 5.8 vs 6.9 y, p=0.06) were risk factors for death. In pts with hematologic response (≥PR), bleeding did not recur within 3 y (n=27), but even with response, diarrhea (n=160) persisted in 39%. Resolution was less frequent without hematologic response (persistence in 69%, OR=3.5). Improvement was most often due to treatment of bacterial overgrowth (11/35 pts; 68%) and loperamide (54/59 pts; 91%). Conclusion In AL, meaningful GI involvement is defined by nausea, diarrhea, occurrence of bleeding, and malnutrition. These are primarily associated with mucosal infiltration. GI symptoms can occur in the face of autonomic involvement. While long-term persistence of GI bleeding is rare after serologic response, cachexia and persistent diarrhea drive morbidity, need for nutritional support, and poor survival.

Importance Peripheral neuropathy, defined as damage to peripheral nerves, affects approximately 1% of adults worldwide. More than 200 causes of peripheral neuropathy exist, with symptoms ranging in severity from mild toe numbness to debilitating symptoms that can require a wheelchair. Diabetes is the most common cause of neuropathy, affecting approximately 206 million people worldwide. Observations Peripheral neuropathy is typically length-dependent, which means that symptoms appear in the longest nerve axons (toes) and progress proximally over time. Peripheral neuropathy is typically symmetric and affects sensory axons more than motor axons. Diabetic neuropathy, which is often associated with both sensory symptoms, such as pain, tingling, or numbness; mild weakness; and autonomic symptoms, such as orthostatic hypotension, accounts for more than 50% of peripheral neuropathy in Western populations. Other causes of neuropathy include hereditary causes, such as Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, toxic neuropathy from medications (chemotherapies [eg, cisplatin, paclitaxel, vincristine], amiodarone, or HIV nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors [eg, stavudine, zalcitabine]); alcohol; vitamin deficiencies such as vitamin B 12 ; and monoclonal gammopathies. Up to 27% of adults with neuropathy have no identifiable etiology for their neuropathy after diagnostic testing. Recommended initial testing includes blood glucose (for diabetes), serum B 12 with metabolites (methylmalonic acid with or without homocysteine), and serum protein electrophoresis with immunofixation (for monoclonal gammopathies). First-line medications for neuropathic pain are the α2-δ calcium channel subunit ligands, such as gabapentin and pregabalin; serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, such as duloxetine and venlafaxine; and tricyclic antidepressants, such as amitryptyline and nortriptyline. Pain often persists despite medical management. At least a 50% reduction in pain was observed in 38% of those with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy receiving 1200 mg of gabapentin daily. Combination drug therapies for neuropathic pain may provide added benefit. The prognosis of peripheral neuropathy depends on its underlying cause, but complete reversal of nerve damage is uncommon even in cases for which there are available treatments. Conclusions and Relevance Peripheral neuropathy affects approximately 1% of adults worldwide and may cause sensory, motor, and autonomic symptoms. Diabetes is the most common cause of peripheral neuropathy in Western countries. First-line therapies for neuropathic pain include gabapentin, pregabalin, duloxetine, and amitriptyline.

ABSTRACT Iatrogenic spinal accessory nerve (SAN) injuries can occur as complications of posterior triangle of the neck surgery, resulting in lateral scapular winging and a shoulder droop. Rarely has this complication been described after a cosmetic rhytidectomy (face‐lift procedure). Here, we present two cases of iatrogenic SAN injuries that occurred after cosmetic rhytidectomies. The use of electrodiagnostic and ultrasound examinations provides invaluable information to assess peripheral nerve injuries. Electrodiagnostic testing can confirm the presence and severity of the injury, while ultrasound can provide additional anatomical information and direct visualization to confirm the continuity of the nerve and assess muscle denervation changes.

ABSTRACTBackground and AimsNerve conduction studies (NCS) are integral to diagnosing chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), but their role in predicting treatment outcomes remains underexplored. This study evaluates NCS changes at first follow‐up (first NCS changes) as predictors of treatment success in CIDP, focusing on their correlation with clinical outcomes over time.MethodsNewly diagnosed CIDP patients meeting the 2021 EAN/PNS criteria were retrospectively evaluated. Baseline and first follow‐up NCS parameters were compared with clinical outcomes, assessed by the Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) and Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score. All patients received first‐line immunotherapy (intravenous immunoglobulin, corticosteroids, or plasma exchange).ResultsOf 39 treated patients, 26 (66.7%) were responders based on improving NIS trends, while 13 (33.3%) were nonresponders. Responders showed significant improvements at the first follow‐up in fibular compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude, ulnar CMAP amplitude, summated CMAP amplitudes, and fibular motor conduction velocity. Changes in fibular CMAP amplitude consistently correlated with NIS (R = −0.8 to −0.6, p ≤ 0.004) and INCAT disability score improvements (R = −0.6 to −0.3, p ≤ 0.032) across all follow‐up intervals up to 60 months. Ulnar and summated CMAP amplitude changes also correlated with clinical outcomes, though their associations were less sustained than those of fibular CMAP amplitude.InterpretationThe first change in fibular CMAP amplitude is a reliable biomarker for predicting CIDP treatment response, with ulnar and summated CMAP amplitudes as alternatives when the fibular response is absent. Our findings highlight the utility of first NCS changes in monitoring and predicting treatment outcomes in CIDP.

ABSTRACTBackground and AimsChronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is difficult to distinguish from mimicking disorders, with misdiagnosis resulting in IVIG overutilization. We evaluate a clinical‐electrophysiological model to facilitate CIDP versus mimic neuropathy prediction.MethodsUsing the European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) 2021 CIDP guidelines we derived 26 clinical and 144 nerve conduction variables. The model was generated and validated utilizing total CIDP (n = 129) and mimics (n = 309); including (1) IgG4‐nodopathies; (2) POEMS (polyneuropathy–organomegaly–endocrinopathy–monoclonal protein‐skin changes); (3) anti‐myelin‐associated‐glycoprotein; (4) paraneoplastic; (5) Waldenström B‐cell lymphoma; (6) diabetic neuropathies; (7) amyloidosis; (8) Charcot–Marie–Tooth; (9) motor neuropathies/neuronopathies; and (10) idiopathic‐inflammatory‐myopathies.ResultsWe analyzed 9282 clinical and 51 408 electrophysiological data points. Univariate analysis identified 11 of 26 clinical variables with significant odds ratios. A multivariate regression model using four clinical and two electrophysiologic variables achieved 93% area‐under‐curve (95% CI 91–95): progression over 8 weeks (OR 40.66, 95% CI 5.31–311.36), absent autonomic involvement (OR 17.82, 95% CI 2.93–108.24), absent muscle atrophy (OR 16.65, 95% CI 3.27–84.73), proximal weakness (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.58–8.33), ulnar motor conduction velocity slowing < 35.7 m/s (OR 5.21, 95% CI 2.13–12.76), and ulnar motor conduction block (OR 13.37, 95% CI 2.47–72.40). A web‐based probability calculator (https://news.mayocliniclabs.com/cidp‐calculator/) was developed, with 100% sensitivity and 68% specificity at a 92% probability threshold. Specificity improved to 93% when considering “red flags,” electrophysiologic criteria, and laboratory testing.InterpretationA probability calculator using clinical electrophysiological variables assists CIDP differentiation from mimics, with scores below 92% unlikely to have CIDP. The highest specificity is achieved by considering clinical “red flags,” electrophysiologic demyelination, and laboratory testing.