Rashed, Hebatallah R.

The heat shock protein B8 (HSPB8) is one of the small heat shock proteins (sHSP or HSPB) and is a ubiquitous protein in various organisms, including humans. It is highly expressed in skeletal muscle, heart, and neurons. It plays a crucial role in identifying misfolding proteins and participating in chaperone-assisted selective autophagy (CASA) for the removal of misfolded and damaged, potentially cytotoxic proteins. Mutations in HSPB8 can cause distal hereditary motor neuropathy (dHMN), Charcot–Marie–Tooth (CMT) disease type 2L, or myopathy. The disease can manifest from childhood to mid-adulthood. Most missense mutations in the N-terminal and α-crystallin domains of HSPB8 lead to dHMN or CMT2L. Frameshift mutations in the C-terminal domain (CTD), resulting in elongation of the HSPB8 C-terminal, cause myopathy with myofibrillar pathology and rimmed vacuoles. Myopathy and motor neuropathy can coexist. HSPB8 frameshift mutations in the CTD result in HSPB8 mutant aggregation, which weakens the CASA ability to direct misfolded proteins to autophagic degradation. Cellular and animal models indicate that HSPB8 mutations drive pathogenesis through a toxic gain-of-function mechanism. Currently, no cure is available for HSPB8-associated neuromuscular disorders, but numerous therapeutic strategies are under investigation spanning from small molecules to RNA interference to exogenous HSPB8 delivery.

ABSTRACTBackground and AimsChronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is difficult to distinguish from mimicking disorders, with misdiagnosis resulting in IVIG overutilization. We evaluate a clinical‐electrophysiological model to facilitate CIDP versus mimic neuropathy prediction.MethodsUsing the European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) 2021 CIDP guidelines we derived 26 clinical and 144 nerve conduction variables. The model was generated and validated utilizing total CIDP (n = 129) and mimics (n = 309); including (1) IgG4‐nodopathies; (2) POEMS (polyneuropathy–organomegaly–endocrinopathy–monoclonal protein‐skin changes); (3) anti‐myelin‐associated‐glycoprotein; (4) paraneoplastic; (5) Waldenström B‐cell lymphoma; (6) diabetic neuropathies; (7) amyloidosis; (8) Charcot–Marie–Tooth; (9) motor neuropathies/neuronopathies; and (10) idiopathic‐inflammatory‐myopathies.ResultsWe analyzed 9282 clinical and 51 408 electrophysiological data points. Univariate analysis identified 11 of 26 clinical variables with significant odds ratios. A multivariate regression model using four clinical and two electrophysiologic variables achieved 93% area‐under‐curve (95% CI 91–95): progression over 8 weeks (OR 40.66, 95% CI 5.31–311.36), absent autonomic involvement (OR 17.82, 95% CI 2.93–108.24), absent muscle atrophy (OR 16.65, 95% CI 3.27–84.73), proximal weakness (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.58–8.33), ulnar motor conduction velocity slowing < 35.7 m/s (OR 5.21, 95% CI 2.13–12.76), and ulnar motor conduction block (OR 13.37, 95% CI 2.47–72.40). A web‐based probability calculator (https://news.mayocliniclabs.com/cidp‐calculator/) was developed, with 100% sensitivity and 68% specificity at a 92% probability threshold. Specificity improved to 93% when considering “red flags,” electrophysiologic criteria, and laboratory testing.InterpretationA probability calculator using clinical electrophysiological variables assists CIDP differentiation from mimics, with scores below 92% unlikely to have CIDP. The highest specificity is achieved by considering clinical “red flags,” electrophysiologic demyelination, and laboratory testing.

AbstractRippling muscle disease (RMD) is a rare disorder of muscle hyperexcitability. It is characterized by rippling wave‐like muscle contractions induced by mechanical stretch or voluntary contraction followed by sudden stretch, painful muscle stiffness, percussion‐induced rapid muscle contraction (PIRC), and percussion‐induced muscle mounding (PIMM). RMD can be hereditary (hRMD) or immune‐mediated (iRMD). hRMD is caused by pathogenic variants in caveolin‐3 (CAV3) or caveolae‐associated protein 1/ polymerase I and transcript release factor (CAVIN1/PTRF). CAV3 pathogenic variants are autosomal dominant or less frequently recessive while CAVIN1/PTRF pathogenic variants are autosomal recessive. CAV3‐RMD manifests with a wide spectrum of clinical phenotypes, ranging from asymptomatic creatine kinase elevation to severe muscle weakness. Overlapping phenotypes are common. Muscle caveolin‐3 immunoreactivity is often absent or diffusely reduced in CAV3‐RMD. CAVIN1/PTRF‐RMD is characterized by congenital generalized lipodystrophy (CGL, type 4) and often accompanied by several extra‐skeletal muscle manifestations. Muscle cavin‐1/PTRF immunoreactivity is absent or reduced while caveolin‐3 immunoreactivity is reduced, often in a patchy way, in CAVIN1/PTRF‐RMD. iRMD is often accompanied by other autoimmune disorders, including myasthenia gravis. Anti‐cavin‐4 antibodies are the serological marker while the mosaic expression of caveolin‐3 and cavin‐4 is the pathological feature of iRMD. Most patients with iRMD respond to immunotherapy. Rippling, PIRC, and PIMM are usually electrically silent. Different pathogenic mechanisms have been postulated to explain the disease mechanisms. In this article, we review the spectrum of hRMD and iRMD, including clinical phenotypes, electrophysiological characteristics, myopathological findings, and pathogenesis.