Back to Authors

Young, Nathan P

0000-0001-7788-6493

Mayo Clinic

Department of Neurology (JIS, NPY); Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine (JOE), Department of Medicine; and Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (RAV), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Citations 6

Neurons on the rocks: A case of alcohol use and early onset Alzheimer's disease
Starr, Evan G. , Dhaliwal, Jasleen , McLatchey, Michael G., Young, Nathan P. , Lai, Benjamin , Young, Nathan P , Lai, Benjamin

Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Reports | June 4, 2026 | Volume: 10 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/25424823261459404 Get It

A 46-year-old female was admitted to the hospital for confusion, cognitive decline, and hallucinations with alcohol withdrawal. Her history was notable for Alcohol use disorder (AUD) and family history of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Comprehensive workup was unrevealing for metabolic encephalopathy, infection, or nutritional deficiencies. Phosphatidyl ethanol level was 1181, indicating severe alcohol misuse. Phospho-Tau 217 testing raised suspicion of AD and FDG-PET scan confirmed patterns consistent with early onset AD. AUD can precipitate earlier or more severe onset of AD. Phospho-Tau 217 can be a useful screening marker to identify people at risk of AD to prompt intensive treatment.
Postradiation Cranial Brachial Plexus Neuropathy: Clinical Examination and Electrophysiologic Diagnosis
Gordon-Hackshaw, Lemuel E., Seven, Nathan A. , Young, Nathan P. , Young, Nathan P , Gordon-Hackshaw, Lemuel E.

Annals of Internal Medicine: Clinical Cases | December 3, 2024 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 12 | Pages: No page available

10.7326/aimcc.2024.0293 Get It

Teaching Video NeuroImage: Perivascular Tumefactive Neurosarcoidosis of the Basal Ganglia
Aboseif, Albert , Young, Nathan P. , McKeon, Andrew , McKeon, Andrew , Young, Nathan P , Aboseif, Albert

Neurology | September 16, 2024 | Volume: 103 | Issue: 8 | Pages: No page available

10.1212/wnl.0000000000209899 Get It

Migraine Patient Care Model Preferences in a Community Practice
Stern, Jennifer I. , Ebbert, Jon O. , Young, Nathan P. , Young, Nathan P , Vierkant, Robert A.

Neurology Clinical Practice | March 19, 2023 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1212/cpj.0000000000200131 Get It

Episodic and Chronic Migraine in Primary Care
Young, Nathan P. , Philpot, Lindsey M. , Vierkant, Robert A. , Rosedahl, Jordan K., Upadhyaya, Sudhindra, Harris, Ann , Ebbert, Jon O. , Upadhyaya, Sudhindra G, Vierkant, Robert A , Philpot, Lindsey M , Young, Nathan P , Harris, Ann

Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain | April 29, 2019 | Volume: 59 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1042-1051

10.1111/head.13543 Get It

Objective To inform migraine care model development by assessing differences between patients with chronic migraine (CM) and episodic migraine (EM) in the current state of treatment, disability, patient satisfaction, and quality improvement opportunities. Background Efficient and focused use of scarce resources will be needed to address challenges within large populations of migraine patients. Methods We deployed a cross‐sectional survey study of randomly selected migraine patients within a community primary care practice. Results There were 516 survey respondents (516/1804 [30%] response rate). CM patients were more likely than EM patients to report care from a neurologist (76/110 [69%] vs 229/406 [56%]; P = .0026), and higher disability according to the Migraine Disability Assessment and Headache Impact Test – 6 questionnaires ( P < .0001). CM patients were less likely than EM patients to report overall satisfaction with care (16/110 [38%] vs 156/406 [66%], P = .0002), satisfaction with access to care (17/110 [33%] vs 176/406 [68%], P < .0001), and advice they needed (16/110 [31%] vs 160/406 [62%], P < .0001). Most patients with migraine had been offered triptan medications 377/516 (78%). Overall, 156/516 (31%) of individuals were currently taking any medication for migraine prevention, and 208/516 (40%) including botulinum toxin injections. CM patients were more likely to be taking preventive medication (39/110 [36%] vs 117/406 [29%], P = .0191) and report familiarity with the diagnosis of medication‐overuse headache than patients with EM (80/110 [81%] vs 256/406 [69%], P = .0178). Conclusions We observed differences between patients with chronic and EM and expected care delivery improvement opportunities for migraine patients in primary care. CM patients report higher levels of disability and less satisfaction with access to perceived needed medical advice and care. These findings support the need to further develop and study novel care models to efficiently and effectively deliver high‐quality care and expertise in limited supply to a diverse migraine population.