Back to Authors

Ovrom, Erik

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Citations 2

Relationship between number of prior lumbar spine surgeries and outcomes following spinal cord stimulator implantation: A multisite, retrospective pooled analysis
Hagedorn, Jonathan M. , D’Souza, Ryan S. , Yadav, Abhishek , George, Tony K., DeTemple, Nathan, Ovrom, Erik A. , Lam, Christopher , Sayed, Dawood , Hall, Morgan , Stephenson, Lauren , Rivera, Zach, Hoelzer, Bryan C. , Ovrom, Erik, Lam, Christopher M , Deer, Tim , Hagedorn, Jonathan M , D'Souza, Ryan S , Stephenson, Lauren, Deer, Timothy R.

Pain Practice | April 13, 2024 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 882-890

10.1111/papr.13371 Get It

Abstract Objectives Lumbar spine surgery is a common procedure for treating disabling spine‐related pain. In recent decades, both the number and cost of spine surgeries have increased despite technological advances and modification in surgical technique. For those patients that have continued uncontrolled back and/or lower extremity pain following lumbar spine surgery, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as a viable treatment option. However, the impact of lumbar spine surgical history remains largely unstudied. Specifically, the current study considers the impact of number of prior lumbar spine surgeries on pain relief outcomes following SCS implantation. Materials and Methods We queried the electronic medical record of five separate pain practices for all patients who have undergone a SCS implant between January 1, 2017, and March 1, 2020. Inclusion criteria consisted of any patients with an SCS implant who underwent a prior lumbar spine surgery. The primary outcome was the mean calculated percentage pain relief in patients based on number of prior lumbar spine surgeries. Results There was a total of 1974 total SCS implant cases identified across five separate pain clinics. There was no difference in mean calculated pain relief in patients with one prior spine surgery versus those with two or more prior spine surgeries (28.2% vs. 25.8%, adjusted β‐coefficient –3.1, 95% CI –8.9 to 2.7, p = 0.290). Similarly, when analyzing number of spine surgeries as a continuous variable, there was no association between number of spine surgeries and calculated pain relief (adjusted β‐coefficient –1.5, 95% CI –4.0 to 1.1, p = 0.257). Additionally, after patients were stratified based on waveform, there was no association between number of prior lumbar spine surgeries (analyzed both as a categorical and continuous variable) and calculated percentage pain relief. Conclusions This multicentered retrospective study found that there was no significant difference in pain scores in individuals who received SCS following one or more lumbar spine surgeries. Additionally, the waveform of the SCS device had no statistically significant impact on post‐operative pain scores following one or more lumbar spine surgeries.
Cultural Competency and Surgical Decision Making in Otolaryngology
Ovrom, Erik A. , Zemene, Yilkal , Andrade, Victor, Wiedermann, Joshua P. , Ovrom, Erik, Wiedermann, Joshua , Gerndt, Sophie P.

Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery | March 8, 2022 | Volume: 166 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 793-794

10.1177/01945998221083848 Get It

Given the high prevalence of otolaryngology infections such as tonsillitis, otitis, and pharyngitis in low and middle income countries, the field of global otolaryngology continues to grow to accommodate patients around the world. This commentary focuses on best practices in transcultural communications between US doctors and foreign patients with an emphasis on cultural competency. We use alternative medicine as an exemplar for how to collaborate with patients to develop treatment plans that respect their cultural beliefs and lifestyles. Rather than assigning value to the patient’s alternative medicine practices, we believe that instructing and counseling a patient on how to incorporate follow‐up visits and rehabilitation after allopathic medical procedures such as surgical tonsillectomy should be done in a way that respects the patient’s preexisting health regimen. By doing so, these new aspects of their health care will take a discrete place in their wellness practices and engender more trust and better health outcomes.