Ovrom, Erik A.

AbstractInterstitial lung disease (ILD) encompasses pulmonary disorders characterized by chronic inflammation and fibrosis that disrupt pulmonary gas exchange. While ILD‐related changes in the lung parenchyma are well‐documented, less is known about how ILD affects luminal area within the large conducting airways. This retrospective, case–control study tested the hypothesis that patients with ILD would have greater large conducting airway luminal areas than healthy matched controls. Three‐dimensional reconstructions of computed tomography images were used to quantify airway luminal areas in patients with ILD (n = 82; 54% female) and healthy controls matched for age, sex, and height. Patients with ILD had 16%–22% greater airway luminal areas across all seven measured large conducting airways compared to controls (all p < 0.001). Among patients with ILD, males had 17%–34% greater height‐normalized airway luminal areas than females (all p < 0.05). These data provide evidence that ILD is associated with greater large conducting airway luminal area, even when matched for key demographic factors. Consistent with observations in health, males with ILD exhibited greater height‐normalized airway size than females. These findings offer new insight into airway remodeling in ILD and highlight potential sex differences in airway luminal area.

Three-dimensional reconstruction of airways has shown increased luminal area in patients with COVID-19 and post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 when compared with healthy controls. These findings suggest the role of large conducting airways in the pathogenesis of post-acute sequelae of COVID 19.

Abstract Objectives Lumbar spine surgery is a common procedure for treating disabling spine‐related pain. In recent decades, both the number and cost of spine surgeries have increased despite technological advances and modification in surgical technique. For those patients that have continued uncontrolled back and/or lower extremity pain following lumbar spine surgery, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as a viable treatment option. However, the impact of lumbar spine surgical history remains largely unstudied. Specifically, the current study considers the impact of number of prior lumbar spine surgeries on pain relief outcomes following SCS implantation. Materials and Methods We queried the electronic medical record of five separate pain practices for all patients who have undergone a SCS implant between January 1, 2017, and March 1, 2020. Inclusion criteria consisted of any patients with an SCS implant who underwent a prior lumbar spine surgery. The primary outcome was the mean calculated percentage pain relief in patients based on number of prior lumbar spine surgeries. Results There was a total of 1974 total SCS implant cases identified across five separate pain clinics. There was no difference in mean calculated pain relief in patients with one prior spine surgery versus those with two or more prior spine surgeries (28.2% vs. 25.8%, adjusted β‐coefficient –3.1, 95% CI –8.9 to 2.7, p = 0.290). Similarly, when analyzing number of spine surgeries as a continuous variable, there was no association between number of spine surgeries and calculated pain relief (adjusted β‐coefficient –1.5, 95% CI –4.0 to 1.1, p = 0.257). Additionally, after patients were stratified based on waveform, there was no association between number of prior lumbar spine surgeries (analyzed both as a categorical and continuous variable) and calculated percentage pain relief. Conclusions This multicentered retrospective study found that there was no significant difference in pain scores in individuals who received SCS following one or more lumbar spine surgeries. Additionally, the waveform of the SCS device had no statistically significant impact on post‐operative pain scores following one or more lumbar spine surgeries.

ABSTRACT Although severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and hospitalization associated with COVID-19 are generally preventable among healthy vaccine recipients, patients with immunosuppression have poor immunogenic responses to COVID-19 vaccines and remain at high risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 and hospitalization. In addition, monoclonal antibody therapy is limited by the emergence of novel SARS-CoV-2 variants that have serially escaped neutralization. In this context, there is interest in understanding the clinical benefit associated with COVID-19 convalescent plasma collected from persons who have been both naturally infected with SARS-CoV-2 and vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 (“vax-plasma”). Thus, we report the clinical outcome of 386 immunocompromised outpatients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 and who received contemporary COVID-19-specific therapeutics (standard-of-care group) and a subgroup who also received concomitant treatment with very high titer COVID-19 convalescent plasma (vax-plasma group) with a specific focus on hospitalization rates. The overall hospitalization rate was 2.2% (5 of 225 patients) in the vax-plasma group and 6.2% (10 of 161 patients) in the standard-of-care group, which corresponded to a relative risk reduction of 65% ( P = 0.046). Evidence of efficacy in nonvaccinated patients cannot be inferred from these data because 94% (361 of 386 patients) of patients were vaccinated. In vaccinated patients with immunosuppression and COVID-19, the addition of vax-plasma or very high titer COVID-19 convalescent plasma to COVID-19-specific therapies reduced the risk of disease progression leading to hospitalization. IMPORTANCE As SARS-CoV-2 evolves, new variants of concern (VOCs) have emerged that evade available anti-spike monoclonal antibodies, particularly among immunosuppressed patients. However, high-titer COVID-19 convalescent plasma continues to be effective against VOCs because of its broad-spectrum immunomodulatory properties. Thus, we report clinical outcomes of 386 immunocompromised outpatients who were treated with COVID-19-specific therapeutics and a subgroup also treated with vaccine-boosted convalescent plasma. We found that the administration of vaccine-boosted convalescent plasma was associated with a significantly decreased incidence of hospitalization among immunocompromised COVID-19 outpatients. Our data add to the contemporary data providing evidence to support the clinical utility of high-titer convalescent plasma as antibody replacement therapy in immunocompromised patients.

Background: Patients with respiratory manifestations of acute COVID-19 infection have enlarged luminal areas of central conducting airways demonstrated on computed tomography imaging and abnormal pulmonary function. In some cases, COVID-19 symptoms may persist for more than 4 weeks, referred to as long COVID, and the effect on airway luminal area remains unknown. Herein, we report airway luminal cross-sections areas among a long COVID group, compared to individuals with an acute COVID-19. We aim to investigate if large conducting airways sizes are different between acute COVID-19 and long COVID patients. Methods: A cohort of 181 people with long COVID were screened, of which 20 people (9 men, 11 women; 55.9 ± 14.1 years) were included in analyses. Twenty age, height, and sex matched patients with an acute (< 4 weeks of persistent symptoms from diagnosis) COVID-19 infection (55.7 ± 15.2 years) served as a comparison group. We used a three-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography imaging to measure luminal areas of the trachea, right and left main bronchi, bronchus intermediate, right and left upper lobe, and left lower lobe bronchi at proximal, middle, and distal cross-sectional points in both groups. Airway luminal area was taken as the average of the three points. We compared average lumen area of long COVID patients with acute COVID-19 individuals, using an independent samples t-test. Results: We found no significant difference comparing measurements of the following airway luminal cross-sectional areas: trachea (277.7 ± 100.4 vs. 268.0 ± 70.5 mm2 p=0.73), right main bronchus (191.0 ± 66.1 vs. 190.1 ± 49.0 mm2, p=0.96), bronchus intermediate (112.3 ± 33.4 vs. 109.3 ± 27.9 mm2, p=0.76), right upper lobe bronchus (74.4 ± 21.0 vs. 73.7 ± 25.5 mm2, p=0.92), left main bronchus (129.1 ± 50.1 vs. 136.9 ± 38.0 mm2, p=0.58), left lower lobe bronchus (57.8 ± 18.2 vs. 59.0 ± 13.4 mm2, p=0.82), and left upper lobe bronchus (80.1 ± 19.5 vs. 77.9 ± 22.9 mm2, p=0.75) in the long COVID and acute COVID-19 groups respectively. Conclusion: In patients with long COVID, compared to those with an acute COVID-19 infection, we did not see differences in central airway luminal areas. Further analysis of a larger cohort is needed to determine whether enlarged airway luminal areas, associated with acute COVID-19, persist in long COVID. This research will expand knowledge on functional consequences for patients with long COVID. Funding: F32HL154320 to JWS; 5R35HL139854 to MJJ. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) encompasses several pulmonary disorders associated with scarring and fibrosis of pulmonary tissue. People with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a subset of ILD, have greater central airway luminal area compared to age- and sex-matched healthy controls when evaluated using microcomputed tomography, a process examining the luminal area of ex-vivo lung tissue. In this study we aimed to confirm these findings using a different method of airway assessment, three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) scans. Moreover, in health, males have larger central airways than height-matched females, but it remains unknown if there are sex differences in airway area among people with ILD. We hypothesized that sex differences observed in healthy people would persist among people with ILD. Methods: A cohort of 399 patients with lung CT scans were screened, of which 19 people (7 females) with ILD were included in analyses after exclusions. People with ILD were matched based on sex, age, and height to 19 healthy controls. We assessed cross-sectional luminal area at the midpoint of seven conducting airways (trachea, left and right main bronchus, intermediate bronchus, left and right upper lobe, and left lower lobe). Results from pulmonary function tests were also abstracted, as available. To examine sex differences, we compared airway luminal area, normalized to participant height, between males and females with ILD. Sex differences were analyzed using a univariate ANOVA test. Results: People with ILD had a preserved ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first second to forced vital capacity (101 ±12%predicted) and decreased diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (55 ±23%predicted). People with ILD had airways that were between 19.6%-45.0% larger than controls (p<0.05). Composite physiologic index, a marker of ILD severity, was not different between sexes (p=0.07). Males with ILD had significantly larger, luminal areas than females in two central airways - right main bronchus (1.46±0.41 vs. 1.07±0.22 mm2/cm, p=0.04) and left upper lobe (0.54±0.10 vs. 0.43±0.08 mm2/cm, p=0.02). However, luminal area of other central airways, including: trachea (2.15±0.57 vs. 1.65±0.32 mm2/cm, p=0.051), bronchus intermediate (0.77±0.23 vs. 0.61±0.13 mm2/cm, p=0.12), right upper lobe (0.47±0.15 vs. 0.40±0.06 mm2/cm, p=0.26), left main bronchus (0.93±0.33 vs. 0.69±0.16 mm2/cm, p=0.09), and left lower lobe (0.41±0.13 vs. 0.40±0.08 mm2 /cm, p=0.79) were not different between sexes in people with ILD. Conclusion: Sex differences observed in healthy people are potentially preserved in ILD, but a more robust sample is required to fully elucidate these findings. Illuminating any sex differences in ILD pathophysiology may provide knowledge to treat and improve clinical outcomes in ILD. Funding: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (F32HL154320 to JWS; 5R35HL139854 to MJJ). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Purpose: The present work was performed to provide an updated and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis on the potential ergogenic effects associated with ischemic preconditioning (IPC). In this context, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the magnitude of the potential ergogenic effect of IPC and the influence of descriptive factors that contribute to the variability of its potential ergogenic effect. We hypothesized that IPC would be associated with improved exercise performance, and putative factors would modulate this association. Methods: On October 17, 2022, a systematic search of three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) was performed. The electronic search yielded 2,876 unique records, of which 79 were included in analyses after abstract and full-text screening. Eligible study designs included within subjects cross-over, sham controlled study, with a randomized or counter balanced study design. Prespecified analyses aimed to determine whether the ergogenic effect of IPC is influenced by: 1) exercise parameters (type of exercise, fraction of inspired oxygen, and muscle group(s) involved in exercise) and 2) IPC parameters (dosage, duration, and timing before onset of exercise). Results: The meta-analysis model demonstrated that exercise performance was improved with IPC compared to the sham control (pooled standard paired difference (SPD), 0.156; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.084 to 0.227; Z = 4.258; P < 0.001; n = 105). Both remote IPC (pooled SPD, 0.219; 95% CI, 0.071 to 0.368; Z = 2.894; P = 0.004) and local IPC (pooled SPD, 0.159; 95% CI, 0.088 to 0.231; Z = 4.386; P < 0.001) demonstrated ergogenic effects on performance. Subgroup analyses based on the fraction of inspired oxygen level revealed improved exercise performance in normoxic (pooled SPD, 0.169; 95% CI, 0.100 to 0.237; Z = 4.805; P < 0.001) but not hypoxic (pooled SPD, 0.160; 95% CI, -0.029 to 0.349; Z = 1.659; P = 0.097) conditions. The most notable improvement in exercise performance following IPC was demonstrated during cycling (pooled SPD, 0.116; 95% CI, 0.023 to 0.209; Z = 2.454; P = 0.014), running (pooled SPD, 0.180; 95% CI, 0.056 to 0.303; Z = 2.847; P = 0.004), and leg press (pooled SPD, 0.421; 95% CI, 0.034 to 0.808; Z = 2.131; P = 0.033) performance tests. Conclusion: Overall, IPC demonstrated a clear ergogenic effect on exercise performance across various exercise modalities under normoxic environmental conditions. The enhanced exercise performance following IPC was most pronounced in aerobic tests of performance which predominantly recruited large muscle groups in the lower extremities: cycling, running, and leg press. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

This narrative review summarizes the current knowledge of the genetic and epigenetic contributions to the development of fibromyalgia (FM). Although there is no single gene that results in the development of FM, this study reveals that certain polymorphisms in genes involved in the catecholaminergic pathway, the serotonergic pathway, pain processing, oxidative stress, and inflammation may influence susceptibility to FM and the severity of its symptoms. Furthermore, epigenetic changes at the DNA level may lead to the development of FM. Likewise, microRNAs may impact the expression of certain proteins that lead to the worsening of FM-associated symptoms.

Given the high prevalence of otolaryngology infections such as tonsillitis, otitis, and pharyngitis in low and middle income countries, the field of global otolaryngology continues to grow to accommodate patients around the world. This commentary focuses on best practices in transcultural communications between US doctors and foreign patients with an emphasis on cultural competency. We use alternative medicine as an exemplar for how to collaborate with patients to develop treatment plans that respect their cultural beliefs and lifestyles. Rather than assigning value to the patient’s alternative medicine practices, we believe that instructing and counseling a patient on how to incorporate follow‐up visits and rehabilitation after allopathic medical procedures such as surgical tonsillectomy should be done in a way that respects the patient’s preexisting health regimen. By doing so, these new aspects of their health care will take a discrete place in their wellness practices and engender more trust and better health outcomes.