Ramanathan, Ramesh K.

Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive and lethal cancer characterized by high invasiveness, local and extensive dissemination at time of diagnosis and resistance to treatment. Few therapies have shown efficacy in the past and even standard of care therapies yield only modest improvements in the mortality of patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Efforts have been undertaken to study the pancreatic tumor microenvironment and have established its complex and immunosuppressive nature which could explain the high resistance to chemotherapy. Novel therapies targeting the tumor microenvironment with an aim to decrease this resistance, improve immune tolerance and increase the efficacy of the current treatment have shown some promising preliminary results in preclinical and clinical trials. We review the current advances in the field of immunotherapy and their effectiveness as a potential treatment strategy in the pancreatic cancer.

Abstract Background: MIF is a pleiotropic cytokine involved in tumor proliferation, invasiveness, angiogenesis, and the proinflammatory microenvironment. oxMIF is the pathogenic form mainly in tumor and its surrounding stroma. Imalumab (BAX69) is a novel recombinant, fully-human, monoclonal antibody that targets oxMIF, inhibiting tumorigenesis. Preclinical data demonstrated that imalumab has antitumor activities and acceptable toxicities. Methods: The primary endpoint of this dose-escalation study (3+3 design) was to assess maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The secondary endpoints were to assess antitumor activity, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD). Patients (pts) received intravenous (IV) imalumab [28-d cycles; 2 dose schedules (DS)]: biweekly in all solid tumors (DS1); weekly in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), metastatic ovarian cancer (OvCa) and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (DS2). Results: As of July 1 2015, 48 pts were treated in this study. DS1 = 19 pts in 6 cohorts (1, 3, 10, 25, 37.5, and 50 mg/kg), and DS2 = 29 pts in 2 cohorts (10 and 25 mg/kg) including expansion (10 mg/kg) into mCRC, OvCa and NSCLC. AUC and Cmax increased with dose. Dose escalation was stopped at 50 mg/kg (DS1) and 25mg/kg (DS2). An MTD was not reached for either DS. One pt reported dose-limiting toxicities: hypersensitivity pneumonitis (DS1; 50 mg/kg). There were no other grade 3 and 4 treatment related adverse events (trAEs). Grade 2 trAEs include: fatigue (n = 2), constipation (n = 1), peripheral edema (n = 1), infusion reaction (n = 1), and urticaria (n = 1). Stable disease (SD) ?4 mo was seen in 7 heavily pre-treated pts, including 1 pt with NSCLC who achieved SD for 13.4 mo. In DS2; Pre- and on-therapy tumor biopsies showed satisfactory tissue penetration of imalumab resulting in target saturation in all biopsy evaluable patients in all 3 tumor types. Biopsies revealed regulation of PI3K-AKT-mTOR downstream signaling, TNF-α signaling, anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1 and IL-10), and apoptosis. Based on clinical PK and PD study, 10mg/kg weekly was considered a biologically active dose and sufficient to reach ?95% target binding by the end of first cycle. Conclusions: Imalumab was well tolerated and showed single agent antitumor activity in heavily pretreated pts. An MTD was not reached. Recommended phase II dose (RP2D) is 10 mg/kg IV weekly. NCT01765790 Citation Format: Devalingam Mahalingam, Manish R. Patel, Jasgit C. Sachdev, Lowell L. Hart, Niels Halama, Ramesh K. Ramanathan, John Sarantopoulos, Xiaochun Liu, Salim Yazji, Dirk Jaeger, Deyaa Adib, Randolf Kerschbaumer, Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou. First-in-human phase 1 study assessing imalumab (BAX69), an anti-oxidized macrophage migration inhibitory factor (oxMIF) antibody in advanced solid tumors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr CT046.

Abstract Pancreatic adenocarcinoma generally presents with a poor prognosis and an extremely low response rate to first line therapies. There is a critical unmet need to discover and implement effective diagnostic panels to stratify outcomes and tailor treatment strategies to improve survival. The BERG Interrogative Biology® platform utilizes Artificial Intelligence to analyze and integrate multi-omic profiles with clinical annotation to define novel biomarkers and improve treatment interventions. Herein, we analyzed the serum proteome, signaling lipidome, structural lipidome, and metabolome of 163patients at multiple timepoints (pancreatic cancer: 115; pancreatitis: 15; and age-matched healthy controls: 33). Utilizing the power of the Bayesian Network learner, bAIcis™ (BERG Artificial Intelligence Clinical Information System), multi-omic profiles were aligned to the longitudinal clinical information and subjected to AI-algorithms to infer probabilistic cause-and-effect relationships among molecular and clinical variables explicitly explaining pancreatic cancer status, cancer progression, and survival, and defining the interconnectivity of molecular features with clinical phenotype. Network features linking into clinical endpoints and key network pressure points were identified as molecular drivers. The drivers of clinical endpoints were analyzed to rank potential biomarkers. Novel biomarkers were discovered that demonstrate diagnostic potential for pancreatic cancer detection, disease prognosis including metastatic disease progression, patient stratification associated with survival, and response to standard chemotherapy agents like Gemcitibine. A prospective study is underway to validate the biomarkers and discover additional diagnostic and therapeutic molecules to improve the outcomes for patients affected by adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Citation Format: Niven R. Narain, A James Moser, Ramesh Ramanathan, John Crowley, Amy Stoll-D’Astice, Yezhou Sun, Leonardo O. Rodrigues, Eric M. Grund, Emily Chen, Vivek K. Vishnudas, Michael A. Kiebish, Viatcheslav R. Akmaev, Rangaprasad Sarangarajan. Project Survival: Interrogative Biology® platform mediated discovery of molecular markers for detection, stratification and outcomes in pancreatic cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 786.

Abstract Purpose: First-in-human phase I trial to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of BIND-014, a novel, tumor prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–targeted nanoparticle, containing docetaxel. Experimental Design: Patients with advanced solid tumors received BIND-014 every three weeks (n = 28) or weekly (n = 27), with dose levels ranging from 3.5 to 75 mg/m2 and 15 to 45 mg/m2, respectively. Results: BIND-014 was generally well tolerated, with no unexpected toxicities. The most common drug-related toxicities (>20% of patients) on either schedule included neutropenia, fatigue, anemia, alopecia, and diarrhea. BIND-014 demonstrated a dose-linear pharmacokinetic profile, distinct from docetaxel, with prolonged persistence of docetaxel-encapsulated circulating nanoparticles. Of the 52 patients evaluable for response, one had a complete response (cervical cancer on the every three week schedule) and five had partial responses (ampullary adenocarcinoma, non–small cell lung, and prostate cancers on the every-three-week schedule, and breast and gastroesophageal cancers on the weekly schedule). Responses were noted in both PSMA-detectable and -undetectable tumors. Conclusions: BIND-014 was generally well tolerated, with predictable and manageable toxicity and a unique pharmacokinetic profile compared with conventional docetaxel. Clinical activity was noted in multiple tumor types. The recommended phase II dose of BIND-014 is 60 mg/m2 every three weeks or 40 mg/m2 weekly. Clin Cancer Res; 22(13); 3157–63. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract Background: The genomes of metastatic pancreatic cancers contain a myriad of intrachromosomal aberrations indicating a likely high prevalence of DNA repair deficiencies indicating sensitivity to DNA damaging agents such as the platinum’s. Because of this, the drug cisplatin was added to an albumin-bound paclitaxel + gemcitabine regimen, which has already been determined to improve survival over gemcitabine alone in a randomized phase III trial (NEJM 2013; 369:1691-1703). Objectives: To determine the efficacy and safety of albumin-bound paclitaxel and gemcitabine plus cisplatin for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer Methods: Eligibility criteria included Stage IV pancreatic cancer, no prior chemotherapy for systemic disease, KPS ≥ 70; life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks and measurable disease. The doses were albumin-bound paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 undiluted, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 in 500 ml of normal saline (NS), each infused over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle, along with 3 different dose levels of cisplatin (25, 37.5 or 50 mg/m2) in 500 ml of NS infused over 60 minutes, after the nab-paclitaxel infusion. Pre and post cisplatin hydration was given. Results: To date, 10 patients have been entered on study with all patients being evaluable, (baseline and at least one follow up CT scans completed). There have been 2 complete responses (20%), 6 partial responses (PR), (60%), 1 stable disease (10%), and 1 patient with progressive disease (10%), by RECIST 1.1 criteria. An exponential decrease in CA19-9 correlating with the t1/2 of the marker was noted. Response was seen rapidly with PR observed at the first staging evaluation at 9 weeks in 7 of 10 patients. The 8th patient achieved a PR at 18 weeks. Serious adverse events occurred in 4 patients: non-neutropenic sepsis/pneumonia (n = 1), and non-neutropenic bacteremia (n = 1) in the cisplatin 25 mg/m2 cohort; clostridium difficile colitis (n = 1) with cisplatin 37.5 mg/m2; and neutropenic fever/pneumonia (n = 1) with cisplatin 50mg/m2. Discussion: The study has completed phase Ib and will be expanded at the phase II dose of cisplatin 25 mg/m2 for a total of 25 patients. If this favorable response rate is confirmed, this 3 drug regimen could be further developed both for patients with advanced disease as well as in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Supported by grants from the Seena Magowitz Foundation and the SU2C Dream Team Citation Format: Gayle S. Jameson, Erkut Borazanci, Elizabeth Poplin, Michael T. Barrett, John Crowley, Adam Rosenthal, Amy Stoll-D'Astice, Karen L. Ansaldo, Steven Boone, Leticia Lebron, Ramesh K. Ramanathan, Ronald L. Korn, Daniel D. Von Hoff. High complete and partial response rate in a phase Ib pilot trial with cisplatin plus albumin-bound paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-003. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-LB-003

Abstract Background: Genomic assessment of cancer has been revolutionized by Next-Generation sequencing and is increasingly being applied to guide clinical prognostic and therapeutic decision-making. Initial clinical applications have been limited to gene panels and whole exome based strategies due to challenges with time to reporting of results, specimen quantity, analyte quality, and ethical-legal-social issues (ELSI). Methods: Excisional or core tumor biopsies or bone marrow biopsies were obtained from consenting participants. Nucleic acid was extracted from fresh or frozen samples followed by WGS/WES/RNASeq on the Illumina HiSeq2000 or HiSeq2500 and bioinformatics analysis. Therapeutic targets were then prioritized by a multi-disciplinary Genomic Tumor Board (GTB) and CLIA validated using Sanger sequencing, RT-qPCR, FISH and/or IHC. Treatment was delivered using on/off-label FDA approved drugs, available clinical trials and single patient INDs. Results: We consented 64 and enrolled 35 patients with advanced, treatment-refractory cancers. Median age was 59 (range 27-91) with 62% male. The majority had ECOG scores of 1 (94%). A median of 79 (range 28-8891) potentially functional somatic point mutations were identified in each case. One to two mutations/case were further identified as therapeutically targetable in 60% of the cases. The median time from tissue acquisition to CLIA validated results was 116 days (range 42-282) with CLIA validation of targets achieved in 21 of 22 patients. Genomic, target directed treatment was ultimately instituted in 13 patients utilizing: on/off label FDA approved drugs (n = 9), clinical trial (n = 3) and single patient IND (n = 1). Preliminary clinical efficacy was noted in 5 patients (2 PR, 3 SD). Integration of WES, long-insert WGS and RNA-Seq identified a case with an ERRFI1 mutant allele present in only 11% of the DNA reads while 82% of the RNA-Seq reads had the mutant transcript. The patient was treated with erlotinib and achieved a partial response by RECIST criteria. In another case, a fusion between FGFR2-MGEA5 was observed in WES and RNA-Seq data leading to prioritization as a drug target. Reasons for patients not receiving targeted therapy included: inability to access treatment (n = 1), death prior to intended treatment (n = 3), results returned after death (n = 3), no targets identified (n = 2) and decision to pursue alternate therapy (n = 5). Conclusions: Integrating whole genome analysis in a CLIA setting is not only feasible, but also valuable, in the prioritization and selection of potential targeted therapies for patients with advanced tumors. Continued barriers to broad application include the need for shorter time to reporting as well as broad availability of therapies through basket studies. Citation Format: Mitesh J. Borad, Jan Egan, Mia Champion, Katherine Hunt, Robert McWilliams, Ann McCullough, Jessica Aldrich, Sara Nasser, Winnie Liang, Michael Barrett, David Craig, Ramesh Ramanathan, John Carpten, A. Keith Stewart, Alan Bryce. Implementation of CLIA enabled integrated whole genome (WGS)/exome (WES)/transcriptome (RNAseq) next-gen sequencing to identify therapeutically relevant targets in advanced cancer patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr CT112. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-CT112

AbstractPurpose: Immunotherapy as a treatment for cancer holds the promise of complete and durable tumor remission, yet the immunosuppressive environment created by many tumors, advanced patient age, and previous treatments with cytotoxic agents may limit the approach. The activity of motolimod (VTX-2337), a potent and selective Toll-like receptor 8 (TLR8) agonist, was therefore assessed in the context of advanced, late-stage cancer patients.Experimental Design: The repertoire of mediators induced from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in response to motolimod was characterized. Translational studies in cynomolgus monkeys elucidated the activity of motolimod on an intact immune system, identified biomarkers of TLR8 activation, and defined the relationship between the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) response. The PK/PD relationship for motolimod in cancer patients was assessed, compared with preclinical findings, and contrasted with activity in healthy volunteers.Results: In late-stage cancer patients, plasma levels of multiple biomarkers, including IL6, G-CSF, MCP-1, and MIP1-β, increased with increasing motolimod dose. The magnitude and breadth of the biomarker response closely aligned with the response seen in preclinical studies, demonstrating that advanced cancer patients remained responsive to TLR8 activation. In addition, the PK/PD response in cancer patients closely aligned with the activity of motolimod seen in healthy volunteers.Conclusions: Late-stage cancer patients are highly sensitive to TLR8 activation by motolimod. Tumor burden, advanced age, and prior treatment history with cytotoxic agents did not moderate or modify the response predicted by nonclinical studies and confirmed in healthy volunteers. Clin Cancer Res; 21(24); 5445–52. ©2015 AACR.

Abstract Immunotherapy has proven to be a successful treatment approach for some cancer patients. One promising paradigm in immunotherapy is targeting pathogen-associated molecule pattern receptors (PAMPS) such as the toll-like receptors (TLRs) to activate the innate immune system and enhance the development of tumor-directed adaptive immune responses. However, an ongoing concern in the application of immunotherapeutics is the potential for the immune response in cancer patients to be less robust than in healthy individuals, due to the underlying advanced neoplastic disease or due to previous regimens of cytotoxic drugs. To address this concern in relation to the response to TLR8 stimulation, we compared the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship defined in a phase 1 clinical trial of the selective small molecule TLR8 agonist VTX-2337 in oncology patients to the response in healthy volunteers. A phase 1 dose-escalation clinical trial (A101) in subjects with advanced solid tumors (n=33) demonstrated that plasma levels of multiple biomarkers of immune activation, including G-CSF, MCP-1, MIP1-β and TNFα, increased in a dose-dependent manner and correlated with increasing plasma levels of VTX-2337. The PK/PD relationship defined in the initial clinical trial was closely aligned with predictions from both in vitro assays and preclinical studies conducted in cynomolgus monkeys. A subsequent phase 1 trial (A105) was conducted as a single-center, open-label, two-period, randomized, crossover, phase 1 study in normal volunteers (n=10). The objective of this study was to compare the PK/PD profiles and local tolerance of two formulations of VTX-2337. In this study, the two preparations of VTX-2337 demonstrated comparable PK profiles and PD responses. At comparable dose levels, the PK profile and overall exposure (AUC) to VTX-2337 was similar for oncology patients and healthy volunteers. VTX-2337 induced the same repertoire of circulating cytokines and chemokines, indicative of TLR8 activation, in both populations. The magnitude of the mediator response in oncology patients was also highly comparable to the response in healthy volunteers that received a similar dose. This comparison demonstrates that the immune system of cancer patients with advanced disease remains highly responsive to TLR8 activation by VTX-2337. In summary, advanced neoplastic disease or a prior treatment history with cytotoxic agents that can negatively impact immune cell function did not appear to moderate the response to VTX-2337 based on the PK/PD relationship using predictive biomarkers. Citation Format: Greg Dietsch, Donald Northfelt, Ramesh Ramanathan, Peter Cohen, Kristi Manjarrez, Mona Newkirk, James Kyle Bryan, Robert Hershberg. Immune modulation by the TLR8 agonist VTX-2337; a comparison of the pharmacodynamic response in cancer patients and healthy volunteers. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2540. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2540

Abstract Background. nab-Paclitaxel in combination with gemcitabine has emerged as a new treatment option for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC), based on superiority over gemcitabine demonstrated in the phase III MPACT trial. Previously, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score and the presence of liver metastases were shown to be predictive of survival with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine treatment. This analysis sought to further explore the relationship between clinical characteristics and survival in the MPACT trial and to identify potential predictors of overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with MPC. Materials and Methods. Cox regression models adjusted for stratification factors and a stepwise multivariate analysis of prespecified baseline prognostic factors were performed. Results. Treatment effect was significantly associated with survival, with a similar magnitude of reduction in risk of death compared with the previously reported primary analysis. Treatment effect consistently favored nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine across the majority of the prespecified factors. In addition to KPS score and presence of liver metastases, age and number of metastatic sites were independent prognostic factors of overall and progression-free survival. Baseline carbohydrate antigen 19-9 was not found to be an independent prognostic factor of survival in this analysis. Conclusion. The results of this analysis confirm broad utility of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for the treatment of MPC. In addition, these findings suggest that KPS score, presence of liver metastases, age, and number of metastatic sites are important predictors of survival that may be useful when making treatment decisions and designing future clinical trials.