Ramanathan, Ramesh K.

PURPOSE Three agents with differing mechanisms of action are available for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin. In this study, we compared the activity and toxicity of three different two-drug combinations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had not been treated previously for advanced disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were concurrently randomly assigned to receive irinotecan and bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin (IFL, control combination), oxaliplatin and infused fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FOLFOX), or irinotecan and oxaliplatin (IROX). The primary end point was time to progression, with secondary end points of response rate, survival time, and toxicity. RESULTS A total of 795 patients were randomly assigned between May 1999 and April 2001. A median time to progression of 8.7 months, response rate of 45%, and median survival time of 19.5 months were observed for FOLFOX. These results were significantly superior to those observed for IFL for all end points (6.9 months, 31%, and 15.0 months, respectively) or for IROX (6.5 months, 35%, and 17.4 months, respectively) for time to progression and response. The FOLFOX regimen had significantly lower rates of severe nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, and dehydration. Sensory neuropathy and neutropenia were more common with the regimens containing oxaliplatin. CONCLUSION The FOLFOX regimen of oxaliplatin and infused fluorouracil plus leucovorin was active and comparatively safe. It should be considered as a standard therapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

3083 Background: Cancer-Specific Plectin (CSP) is a novel pro-tumorigenic target that is selectively expressed on the surface of tumors, while absent from benign tissue. CSP is highly expressed in many solid cancers, particularly pancreatic (PC), cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and ovarian (OC). ZB131 (Zielbio), is a humanized anti-CSP IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to CSP on the surface of tumor cells, rapidly internalizes and modulates key proliferative and cytoskeletal remodeling signaling pathways to decrease cancer cell growth and increase the recruitment of anti-tumor immune infiltrates. Methods: The dose escalation (3+3 design) and expansion are enrolling adult patients (pts) with advanced treatment-refractory solid tumors. ZB131 was administered IV over 60 minutes (without premedication) weekly. The starting dose of ZB131 is 0.3 mg/kg followed by 1,3, 9, 15 and 30 mg/kg. Primary objectives are safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose/determination of Phase 2 dose. Secondary objectives are preliminary efficacy (RECIST v1.1), Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic parameters in blood and paired tumor biopsies. Results: As of 31 Jan 2023, 24 pts had enrolled (9 PC, 6 CCA, 4 OC, 5 other). The median age was 59.5 yr (range, 35 – 84) with a median of 4 prior lines of therapy. The median ZB131 treatment duration is 5.3 weeks (range, 1 – 33). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed up to the dose of 30 mg/kg which is currently enrolling. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were grade 1/ 2: nausea (n=6), fatigue (n=5), anemia (n=3), diarrhea (n=2), flulike symptoms (n=2), and vomiting (n=2). Mild flu-like symptoms and nausea/vomiting were observed during or following infusion at doses of 9 mg/kg and above. Except for one episode of Gr 3 neutropenia at the 30 mg/kg dose, no other drug-related grade 3/4 TRAE’s were reported. Five pts had stable disease range, 12 – 33 weeks (2 PC, 1 CCA, 2 OC), with a 43% decrease in CA-125 observed in one OC pt. The PKs are linear and dose-proportional for all dose levels evaluated (estimated T ½ of 6-9 days). No antidrug antibodies have been detected. Conclusions: Interim data from dose-escalation of this first-in-class, anti CSP antibody, demonstrates good tolerability with encouraging signs of activity and target engagement in heavily pretreated pts. Results support further clinical evaluation of ZB131 in dose-expansion cohorts including OC and including combination therapy with gemcitabine. Clinical trial information: NCT 05074472 .

4525 Background: Pancreatic cancer cells and surrounding stroma are known to overexpress SPARC (secreted protein acid rich in cysteine), which is associated with poor clinical outcomes. nab-P, an albumin-bound nanoparticle form of paclitaxel increased tumor accumulation of paclitaxel through binding of albumin to SPARC. This disease specific phase 1 study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of G + nab-P and the correlation of response with tumor SPARC and serum CA19–9 levels. Methods: nab-P doses (100–150 mg/m2) + (G) (1000 mg/m2) were given on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle to pts with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and with no prior chemotherapy for their metastatic disease. Level 3 SPARC staining by immunohistochemistry was considered positive. Results: 63 pts received treatment. The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse event that occurred in >20% of pts was neutropenia. Nine (18%) pts and 4 (8%) pts had a grade 3/4 event, respectively. Neuropathy was also observed. One combination-associated death due to sepsis occurred at the 150 mg/m2 nab-P level. Serial PET scans of 53 pts with outside adjudication to date showed 12 (23%) complete responses, 29 (55%) partial responses (PRs) and 4 (8%) stable disease (SD). By RECIST criteria, of the 49 pts evaluable to date, 1(2%) had CR, 12 (24%) had PR, and 20 (41%) had SD. The median survival was 9 months to date. SPARC data were available for 35 pts, of which 10 (29%) were SPARC+ and 25 (71%) were SPARC-. Of these, 27 pts had evaluable response data. Pts that were SPARC+ (8/27) were more likely to be responders (6/8, 75%) than pts who were SPARC- (5/19, 26%), P = 0.03, Fisher's exact test. Median progression-free survival (PFS) increased from 4.8 months for SPARC- pts (22 pts) to 6.2 months for SPARC+ pts (9 pts); however, these data are still immature. Of 45 pts with elevated CA19–9 at baseline, 42 (93%) had maximum decrease of >40% with a median maximum decrease of 92%. Conclusions: The combination of nab-P and G was generally well tolerated and had substantial enough antitumor activity in patients with pancreatic cancer to warrant a phase III clinical trial. SPARC+ status in these patients was associated with higher response rate and longer PFS. [Table: see text]

Objectives This analysis investigated nomogram use to evaluate metastatic pancreatic cancer prognosis. Methods Thirty-four baseline factors were examined in the Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Clinical Trial (MPACT) (nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs gemcitabine) data set. Factors significantly (P < 0.1) associated with overall survival (OS) in a univariable model or with known clinical relevance were tested further. In a multivariable model, factors associated with OS (P < 0.1) were selected to generate the primary nomogram, which was internally validated using bootstrapping, a concordance index, and calibration plots. Results Using data from 861 patients, 6 factors were retained (multivariable analysis): neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, albumin level, Karnofsky performance status, sum of longest diameter of target lesions, presence of liver metastases, and previous Whipple procedure. The nomogram distinguished low-, medium-, and high-risk groups (concordance index, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.65–0.69; median OS, 11.7, 8.0, and 3.3 months, respectively). Conclusions This nomogram may guide estimates of the range of OS outcomes and contribute to patient stratification in future prospective metastatic pancreatic cancer trials; however, external validation is required to improve estimate reliability and applicability to a general patient population. Caution should be exercised in interpreting these results for treatment decisions: patient characteristics could differ from those included in the nomogram development.

Aim Preclinical evidence suggests that oxidized macrophage migration inhibitory factor (oxMIF) may be involved in carcinogenesis. This phase 1 study (NCT01765790) assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and antitumour activity of imalumab, an oxMIF inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer using ‘3 + 3’ dose escalation. Methods In Schedule 1, patients with solid tumours received doses from 1 to 50 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks. In Schedule 2, patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, non‐small‐cell lung, or ovarian cancer received weekly doses of 10 or 25 mg/kg IV (1 cycle = 28 days). Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, dose‐limiting toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Results Fifty of 68 enrolled patients received imalumab. The most common treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs) included fatigue (10%) and vomiting (6%); four grade 3 serious TRAEs (two patients) occurred. The dose‐limiting toxicity was allergic alveolitis (one patient, 50 mg/kg every 2 weeks). The maximum tolerated and biologically active doses were 37.5 mg/kg every 2 weeks and 10 mg/kg weekly, respectively. Of 39 assessed patients, 13 had stable disease (≥4 months in 8 patients). Conclusions Imalumab had a maximum tolerated dose of 37.5 mg/kg every 2 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours, with a biologically active dose of 10 mg/kg weekly. Further investigation will help define the role of oxMIF as a cancer treatment target.

TPS2621 Background: TKM-080301 is a lipid nanoparticle formulation of a small interfering RNA (siRNA) directed against PLK1, a serine/threonine kinase that regulates multiple critical aspects of cell cycle progression and mitosis. Anti-tumor activity, RNA interference and pharmacodynamic effects of PLK1 inhibition have been conclusively demonstrated in preclinical models. Demonstration of pharmacodynamic effects of PLK1 inhibition in patient biopsy samples is an exploratory objective of this first-in-human study. Methods: TKME080301 is being evaluated in an open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalation study in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma. Sequential cohorts of 3 to 6 patients receive TKME080301 as a 30-minute intravenous infusion on Days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Treatment can continue until disease progression, based on overall clinical benefit. Tumor response is determined according to RECIST criteria. Primary study objectives include determination of safety, maximum tolerated dose and dose limiting toxicities. Secondary objectives include characterization of pharmacokinetics and the preliminary assessment of anti-tumor activity. Five cohorts have been enrolled and a tentative Phase 2 dose has been identified. An expansion cohort of 10 patients began enrolling in February, 2013. The focus of the expansion cohort will be to collect additional safety and pharmacokinetic data at the tentative Phase 2 dose, as well as pharmacodynamic data from mandatory biopsy samples. Pre- and post-dose biopsy samples will be evaluated for potential evidence of PLK1 inhibition using 5’ RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends) polymerase chain reaction (to identify the predicted PLK1 mRNA cleavage product), histology (to assess for the presence of aberrant mitotic figures) and immunohistochemistry. An update on enrollment and pharmacodynamic evaluations will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01262235.

3060 Background: EP-100 is a synthetic 28 amino acid LHRH peptide conjugated to an 18 aa cytolytic peptide. Selective targeting in LHRH-R expressing cells occurs via direct binding to the extracellular membrane receptor followed by disruption of the membrane by the cytolytic peptide portion. A first in human, phase I study was performed. Methods: Eligible pts had adequate organ function and LHRH-R tumor expression, as determined by IHC. EP-100 was given IV (30-60 min) weekly x 3 for cohorts 1- 6 (n=20 at 0.6 - 5.2 mg/m2) and then twice weekly x 3 for cohorts 7- 11 (n=18 at 7.8 - 40 mg/m2) with a week break. The pharmacokinetic profile of EP-100 and antibody production against EP-100 was determined by a validated HPLC/MS and ELISA respectively. Potential activity of EP-100 on the pituitary gonadotropes was determined by plasma LH and FSH. Results: We screened 97 pts, archival tumor tissue obtained from 81 pts; 53 (65%) were positive for LHRH-R, of which 37 were enrolled (female 76%) and treated. The LHRH-R expression rate in breast was 81% (N=21) and in ovarian cancer 56% (n=18). Most pts had breast (n= 16, 42%) ovary (n=7,18%), colon (n=4, 11%) or uterine (n=3, 8%) cancer. Pts were treated in a 3 + 3 standard dose escalation scheme. Doses were escalated 100% in the absence of a grade 2 drug related toxicity. MTD was not reached at the highest dose level of 40 mg/m2. Only one DLT occurred, a grade 2 increase in ALT/AST. The only other drug-related toxicity was a self limited infusion-related skin reaction (grade 1-2) in 10 pts. EP-100 was rapidly cleared from circulation, mean half life ranged from 7.1 ± 3.8 min to 15.9 ± 3.6 min. Best response was stable disease for >12 weeks in 5 pts. In 3 pts rapid, sustained decreases in LH/FSH levels were noted. Antibody production against EP-100 was absent in all pts. Conclusions: The study has completed accrual, the phase II dose is 30-40 mg/m2 twice a week x 3 weeks.EP-100is safe, well tolerated and not antigenic/immunogenic. Preclinical studies indicated synergy with paclitaxel and doxorubicin. A phase II study of EP-100 plus paclitaxel in ovarian cancer is planned.

2579 Background: HA, a glycosaminoglycan, accumulates in ~25% of solid tumors and is associated with poor prognosis. Tumors that accumulate HA develop high interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) and become resistant to chemotherapy. In animal models, PEGPH20 reduced tumor-associated HA and increased efficacy of chemotherapy. Methods: This ongoing phase 1 study was designed to assess safety, tolerability, PK, PD, and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PEGPH20 as a single agent in patients with treatment-refractory solid tumors. IV PEGPH20 was administered in a twice weekly or a once weekly dosing schedule with oral dexamethasone (dex) pre-and post dose. Biomarkers included tumor histochemistry to detect HA depletion, plasma HA catabolites, and DCE-MRI or FDG-PET. Results: Fifteen patients have been enrolled into the study. Dose administration ranged from 0.5 µg/kg to 5 µg/kg. Musculoskeletal events (MSEs) were the most common and dose limiting toxicities. To date, up to 3 µg/kg twice weekly IV infusions of PEGPH20 were well tolerated with manageable Grade 1 MSEs in most patients. MTD has not been reached. Plasma concentrations of PEGPH20 showed dose proportional exposure with a terminal half life of ~2 days. Enzymatic activity of PEGPH20 was reflected by dose-dependent HA catabolites in plasma. Pre- and post-dose tumor biopsies from 2 colon patients demonstrated 23-60% reduction in tumor HA after 4 weeks of dosing. Serial DCE-MRI and FDG-PET demonstrated increased tumor perfusion (Ktrans) and decreased metabolic activity 8 and 24hrs post-PEGPH20 in one patient each. Doses of ≤3 µg/kg were tolerated with intermittent Grade 1-2 MSE. Enrollment at dose levels > 3 µg/kg is ongoing. Conclusions: Repeated IV PEGPH20 infusion resulted in dose-dependent systemic exposure and is tolerated with concomitant dex treatment. HA catabolites in plasma demonstrated the in vivo enzymatic activity of PEGPH20. Reduced HA in tumor biopsies and serial DCE-MRI and FDG-PET images confirmed PD activity. Increased tumor perfusion by PEGPH20 may enhance drug delivery to tumor. Combination studies of PEGPH20 with cytotoxic chemotherapy are planned.

3516 Background: A previous report noted that patients (pts) in the phase III study of IFL ± BV who received BV had significantly longer PFS and OS regardless of whether or not they responded according to RECIST criteria (Mass et al, ASCO 2005). It is unclear if this phenomenon is specific to the addition of a biologic to chemotherapy (CT) or a more general benefit from improved therapy since it has been suggested that stable as well as responding disease is beneficial for pts. We repeated the analysis of Mass et al on pts enrolled in N9741, a study which established the superiority of FOLFOX over IFL and contained no biologic compound. Methods: For this retrospective analysis, pts were defined as ‘responders‘ or ‘nonresponders‘ according to whether criteria for complete or partial response (by RECIST -AVF2107g or WHO criteria -N9741) were either achieved (responders) or not achieved (nonresponders). PFS and OS were estimated from Kaplan-Meier curves; hazard ratios (HR) for progression and death in each subgroup were estimated by Cox regression. Results: In both trials, response was associated with superior outcome. However, statistically significant improvements in PFS and OS were observed in both responders and non-responders treated with either IFL + BV or FOLFOX versus IFL, and the magnitude of improvement was similar regardless of response ( Table ). Conclusions: Analysis of two large recent mCRC phase III trials clearly demonstrate that pts who do not achieve a response according to traditional criteria still have significant benefit from the superior regimen, with a similar magnitude of benefit for responders and non-responders, regardless if the regimen called for CT alone or included the antiangiogenic biologic BV. These data support the conclusion that PFS and the percentage of pts experiencing tumor control may more accurately reflect pt benefit than does response rate in phase III trials in mCRC. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

723 Background: BPM31510-IV is an Ubidecarenone (CoQ10) drug-lipid conjugate nanodispersion targeting metabolic machinery in cancer, shifting bioenergetics from lactate dependency towards mitochondrial OxPhos to generate ROS and activate apoptosis. An MTD of BPM31510-IV in combination with gemcitabine was established at 110mg/kg in a Phase I clinical trial, which determined the dose for the Phase 2 investigation. Methods: Eligible patients (aged ≥ 18 y) with relapsed/refractory PDAC to standard treatment (ST) and met inclusion/exclusion criteria were recruited. Patients received 110mg/kg IV BPM31510 in combination with gemcitabine in a 144-hour infusion. Tumor response was evaluated at week 10 and then every 8 weeks. Study endpoints assessed were Overall Response Rate (ORR), Overall Survival (OS), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Time to Progression (TTP), Tumor Response using Adaptive Molecular Responses (multi-omic molecular profiling), changes in CA 19-9 levels and patient reported Quality of Life (QOL) using the validated FACT-HEP PRO. A comprehensive multi-omic profiling for identification of biomarkers for patient stratification was explored. Results: Of the 35 patients enrolled to receive therapy, 18 patients met criteria of an adequately treated cohort (ATC- received BPM31510-IV + gemcitabine for 30 days over 2 cycles and had a RECIST 1.1 evaluation) while remaining (n = 17) had progressive disease (PD). Half of the ATC population (n = 9/18, 50%) achieved best ORR of stable disease (SD); 10/18 (55 %) demonstrated SD as best response at target lesions and 8/18 demonstrated SD at end of Cycle 2. The mTTP was 121 days (70 – 147, 95% CI); PFS 118 days (70 – 131, 95% CI) and OS 218 days (131 – 228, 95% CI), respectively. Overall, BPM31510-IV was well tolerated; the most common AE’s were GI related. Conclusions: The efficacy signal observed in this heavily pretreated population in addition to the toxicity profile warrants further clinical investigation of BPM31510-IV + gemcitabine in advanced PDAC. Clinical trial information: NCT02650804 . [Table: see text]