Hedrick, Eric

3536 Background: Bevacizumab (BV) prolongs overall survival and progression-free survival when added to standard chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). BRiTE is a large, community-based observational registry of patients with mCRC receiving BV plus first-line chemotherapy. Safety and efficacy information in unselected patients with mCRC are collected. Chemotherapy regimen choice is at the physician’s discretion. Methods: To facilitate and evaluate enrollment of a typical community-based mCRC population, eligibility criteria were minimized. Cohort demographics were consistent with the NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for mCRC. Patients are followed for up to 3 years, and safety data including targeted BV-associated serious adverse events (SAEs) are updated every 3 months (mo). Results are based on descriptive analyses and are not adjusted for propensity of treatment, baseline characteristics, and treatment effects. Results: 1968 patients were enrolled between Feb 2004 and Jun 2005. Median study follow-up was 10 mo by Nov 4, 2005. SAEs were reported in 12.0% of patients including gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) (1.7%), postoperative bleeding/wound healing complications (1.2%), arterial thromboembolic events (ATE) (2.1%), and grade 3–4 bleeding (1.9%). 3.2% of patients discontinued BV due to a BV-related toxicity, most commonly bleeding. For patients with the respective event(s), median time to first event was 2.1 mo for GIP, 3.5 mo for ATE and 4.0 mo for grade 3–4 bleeding. 8.9% of patients with no history of hypertension (HTN) developed HTN requiring medication and 6.2% of patients who had HTN requiring medication at baseline experienced worsening of their HTN while on study treatment. Conclusions: In this unselected population of patients with mCRC, the safety profile of BV plus various chemotherapy regimens appears consistent with that observed in the pivotal BV trial. Overall discontinuation of BV due to a BV-related toxicity was uncommon. In this large community-based observational registry, no new BV associated safety issues have been identified. [Table: see text]

3516 Background: A previous report noted that patients (pts) in the phase III study of IFL ± BV who received BV had significantly longer PFS and OS regardless of whether or not they responded according to RECIST criteria (Mass et al, ASCO 2005). It is unclear if this phenomenon is specific to the addition of a biologic to chemotherapy (CT) or a more general benefit from improved therapy since it has been suggested that stable as well as responding disease is beneficial for pts. We repeated the analysis of Mass et al on pts enrolled in N9741, a study which established the superiority of FOLFOX over IFL and contained no biologic compound. Methods: For this retrospective analysis, pts were defined as ‘responders‘ or ‘nonresponders‘ according to whether criteria for complete or partial response (by RECIST -AVF2107g or WHO criteria -N9741) were either achieved (responders) or not achieved (nonresponders). PFS and OS were estimated from Kaplan-Meier curves; hazard ratios (HR) for progression and death in each subgroup were estimated by Cox regression. Results: In both trials, response was associated with superior outcome. However, statistically significant improvements in PFS and OS were observed in both responders and non-responders treated with either IFL + BV or FOLFOX versus IFL, and the magnitude of improvement was similar regardless of response ( Table ). Conclusions: Analysis of two large recent mCRC phase III trials clearly demonstrate that pts who do not achieve a response according to traditional criteria still have significant benefit from the superior regimen, with a similar magnitude of benefit for responders and non-responders, regardless if the regimen called for CT alone or included the antiangiogenic biologic BV. These data support the conclusion that PFS and the percentage of pts experiencing tumor control may more accurately reflect pt benefit than does response rate in phase III trials in mCRC. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

4036 Background: While BV prolongs OS when used with standard 1st- or 2nd-line chemotherapy (CT) in mCRC, no data exist on the effects of BBP. A previous report from BRiTE showed favorable median OS (27.1 mo, 95% CI 24.8-NE), with 1st line PFS (median 10.1 mo, 95% CI:9.7–10.4) comparable to historical mCRC trials, suggesting significant impact of post-progression survival on OS. This exploratory analysis evaluates the association of various pre- and post-treatment variables with OS in BRiTE. Methods: Pt population and methods have been described previously (Kozloff, ASCO 2006). All pts in BRiTE received BV as part of 1st-line therapy. The use of BBP and choice of CT were at investigator’s discretion. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate PFS and OS. Cox’s proportional hazard model was used to assess the independent effects of pre- and post-treatment pt- related factors on OS, including age, ECOG PS, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, site of primary tumor, 1st-line CT regimen, 1st-line PFS, exposure to all 3 active CT agents, receipt of any 2nd-line CT, exposure to cetuximab, and BBP. Though there was variability observed in patterns of BBP, including continuous and discontinuous use, for the purpose of this analysis, BBP was defined as any exposure to BV after 1st progression (PD). Results: A total of 1,953 pts were treated in BRiTE. At median follow-up of 17.5 mo, there were 1,369 1st PD and 839 deaths. Among pts with 1st PD, 65.2% received any 2nd-line CT, 34.8% received cetuximab, and 53.8% received BBP. In a multivariate analysis, BBP and exposure to any 2nd-line CT were independently associated with increased OS (both p<0.0001). Age ≥65, PS ≥1, low albumin, elevated alkaline phosphatase, colon primary, and use of IFL were associated with inferior OS. Conclusions: BBP appears to be associated with longer OS in BRiTE. This finding supports the evaluation of BBP in prospective randomized clinical trials. Other factors that may have impacted this finding, including physician-related variables, will be investigated in future analyses. [Table: see text]

Abstract Introduction: Rearrangements of the MLL (mixed lineage leukemia) gene on chromosome 11q23 are present in 5-10% of either acute myeloid (AML) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and are associated with a poor prognosis. Fusion proteins involving the MLL histone methyltransferase (HMT) result in recruitment of another HMT, DOT1L, to a multi-protein complex leading to aberrant methylation of Histone H3 lysine 79 (H3K79) at MLL target genes and enhanced expression of leukemogenic genes such as HOXA9 and MEIS1. EPZ-5676 is a small molecule inhibitor of DOT1L with sub-nanomolar affinity and >37,000 fold selectivity against additional HMTs. EPZ-5676 treatment of cultured cells reduced histone H3K79 methylation, decreased MLL target gene expression and resulted in selective killing of MLL-rearranged (MLL-r) leukemia cells by inducing apoptosis and differentiation. EPZ-5676 administration led to tumor regression in an MLL-r leukemia xenograft model. We report preliminary results of an ongoing Phase 1 trial of EPZ-5676 in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies, including acute leukemia with MLL-r. Methods: This is a 2-part phase 1 open label dose escalation study investigating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and anti-leukemic activity of EPZ-5676 in adult patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory leukemia (CT.gov: NCT01684150). In the dose-escalation phase, patients with AML, ALL, acute mixed lineage leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, myeloproliferative neoplasia (MPN) or chronic myeloid leukemia were eligible. Eligibility in the expansion phase of the study was restricted to pts with MLL-r or partial tandem duplication of MLL (MLL-PTD). EPZ-5676 was administered via continuous intravenous infusion (CIV) for 21 days of a 28 day cycle in the dose escalation phase and CIV for all 28 days of a 28 day cycle in the expansion phase, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: Between October 2012 and July 2014, 37 pts have enrolled; 36 are evaluable for safety (received at least 1 dose of EPZ-5676) and 28 pts (19 MLL-r, 4 MLL-PTD) are evaluable for anti-leukemia activity (completed at least one post baseline marrow evaluation). The median age at time of enrollment was 53 years (range: 20 to 81 years); the median number of prior systemic therapies was 2 (range: 1 to 6) and 14 pts had a prior allogeneic stem cell transplant. Of the treated pts, disease characteristics were: 31 pts with AML (21 MLL-r, 5 MLL-PTD), 4 pts with ALL (3 MLL-r) and 1 pt with MPN (MLL-r). Table 1: Number of evaluable pts per cohort Dose (mg/m2/day) 12 24 36 54 80 90 21 day CIV 1 5 4 6 3 - 28 day CIV - - - - - 17 The median time on study was 29 days (range: 5-196 days). Adverse events (AEs) reported in >15% of pts were: anemia, fever/neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, constipation, diarrhea, nausea, chills, fatigue, mucosal inflammation, peripheral edema, hypomagnesemia, dyspnea and sepsis; of which leukocytosis, nausea and hypomagnesemia were assessed by the investigator as drug related. Grade I PR interval prolongation, without associated QTc changes, was observed in 2 pts. There were no deaths attributed to study drug treatment, and there were 2 pts with treatment discontinuation for potentially drug-related AEs. Dose proportional PK was observed with rapid attainment of steady-state plasma concentrations on Day 1 of treatment. Preliminary PD data demonstrated inhibition of H3K79 methylation from baseline in marrow (median: 52%, range 0-81%) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (median: 43%, range 25-67%) at doses above 36 mg/m2/day. PD effects were observed by day 8. The 21 day CIV pts recovered H3K79 methylation towards baseline by day 28, and the 28 day CIV pts maintained methyl-mark inhibition throughout cycle 1. To date, best responses for pts with MLL-r are morphologic CR (1 pt.), cytogenetic CR (1 pt), and resolution of leukemia cutis (2 pts). In addition, a treatment-related increase in neutrophils (PMN) and/or monocytes was observed in 6 pts with a median day of onset of 15 days (range 8-28 days). The identification of the MLL-r by split signal FISH in mature PMN suggests a differentiation effect on the leukemic clone. Conclusions: EPZ-5676 is well tolerated and exhibits anti-leukemic activity in MLL-rearranged acute leukemia. These data provide rationale for continued clinical investigation of potential utility of EPZ-5676 in patients with rearrangements of the MLL gene. Disclosures Stein: Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Garcia-Manero:Epizyme, Inc: Research Funding. Rizzieri:Novartis, Inc: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Ariad, Inc: Speakers Bureau. Savona:Karyopharm: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Altman:Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Foundation Medicine: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Armstrong:Epizyme, Inc: Consultancy. Pollock:Epizyme: Employment, Equity Ownership. Waters:Epizyme, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Legler:Epizyme, Inc: Employment. Thomson:Epizyme, Inc: Employment. Daigle:Epizyme, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. McDonald:Epizyme, Inc: Employment. Campbell:Epizyme, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Olhava:Epizyme, Inc: Employment. Hedrick:Epizyme, Inc: Employment; Pharmacyclics, Inc: Equity Ownership. Copeland:New Enterprise Associates: Ad hoc consultant, Ad hoc consultant Other; Mersana: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Key Points Pinometostat demonstrates first evidence of DOT1L target inhibition and clinical responses in a subset of MLL-r advanced leukemia patients. The observed safety profile of pinometostat shows potential for exploration of combination therapies in leukemia.

Purpose Bevacizumab provides a survival benefit in first- and second-line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In a large, observational, bevacizumab treatment study (Bevacizumab Regimens: Investigation of Treatment Effects and Safety [BRiTE]) in patients who had mCRC, a longer-than-expected overall survival (OS) of 25.1 months was reported. The association between various pre- and post-treatment factors (including the use of bevacizumab beyond first progression [BBP]) and survival was examined. Patients and Methods The 1,445 of 1,953 previously untreated patients with mCRC who were enrolled in BRiTE and who experienced disease progression (PD) were classified into three groups: no post-PD treatment (n = 253), post-PD treatment without bevacizumab (no BBP; n = 531), and BBP (n = 642). Relevant baseline and on-study variables, including BBP, were analyzed with a Cox model with respect to their independent effect on survival beyond first PD. Results Median OS was 25.1 months (95% CI, 23.4 to 27.5 months), and median progression-free survival was 10.0 months in the overall BRiTE population. Baseline and postbaseline factors were well balanced between the BBP and no-BBP groups. Median OS rates were 12.6, 19.9, and 31.8 months in the no post-PD treatment, no-BBP, and BBP groups, respectively. In multivariate analyses, compared with no BBP, BBP was strongly and independently associated with improved survival (HR, 0.48; P < .001). Hypertension that required medication was the only bevacizumab-related safety event that occurred more frequently in the BBP group (24.6% v 19.2%). Conclusion These results from a large, prospective, observational study suggest that continued vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition with bevacizumab beyond initial PD could play an important role improving the overall success of therapy for patients who have mCRC.

Purpose In the phase III study AVF2107g, bevacizumab (BV) demonstrated a survival benefit when added to irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (IFL) in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In a parallel phase III study, Intergroup N9741, oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOX) also demonstrated a survival benefit compared with IFL. As these two superior therapies have differing mechanisms of action, we explored whether the improved survival associated with the superior therapy was dependent on tumor response. Patients and Methods For these retrospective, exploratory analyses, patients were defined as responders or nonresponders by whether complete or partial response was achieved with first-line therapy. Results Compared with IFL alone, BV plus IFL and FOLFOX each demonstrated statistically significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) regardless of objective tumor response. BV-treated nonresponders had a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.63 (P = .0001) for PFS and 0.76 (P = .0188) for OS compared with IFL-treated nonresponders. FOLFOX-treated nonresponders had an HR of 0.75 (P = .0029) for PFS and 0.74 (P = .0030) for OS compared with IFL-treated nonresponders. Conclusion In both AVF2107g and N9741, objective response did not predict the magnitude of PFS or OS benefit from the superior therapy; nonresponders, despite a poorer prognosis than responders, achieved extended PFS and OS from BV plus IFL or FOLFOX compared with IFL. On the basis of these data, tumor response in metastatic colorectal cancer is not a necessary factor for a therapy to provide benefit to an individual patient.