Dayyeh, Barham Abu

Background: The American Foregut Society (AFS) is dedicated to advancing patient care and digestive health within the realm of foregut disease. One of the most common and debilitating esophageal conditions is gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The Hill grade is an endoscopic classification of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) based on the appearance of the gastroesophageal flap valve from a retroflexed view of the hiatus. This endoscopic classification provides insight into the anatomic disruption of the EGJ which has been shown to correlate with GERD. However, clinical utilization of this classification by endoscopists has been limited due to the perceived relevance and subjectivity of the classification. With the advent of endoscopic treatment options for GERD, there is renewed enthusiasm to develop a grading system of the EGJ that can objectively define anatomical impairment and reduce interobserver grading variability. Methods: The AFS convened a 13-member working group tasked with reviewing the Hill grade classification and formulating a proposal for its revision utilizing a modified Delphi method. This white paper summarizes the output from this working group. Results: The working group concluded that all components of the antireflux barrier—the lower esophageal sphincter and its sling fibers, the crural diaphragm, and the gastroesophageal flap valve—contribute to EGJ integrity. Using defined objective parameters of extent of hiatal axial herniation and crural disruption and presence or absence of a flap valve, the new AFS classification stratifies EGJ integrity from normal (grade 1) to increasing degrees of EGJ disruption (grade 2-4) beginning with loss of the flap valve and progressing to increasing degrees of crural disruption and hiatus hernia. This AFS classification also stipulates appropriate endoscopic methodology to utilize in making the assessment and provides a basic nomenclature for communication among endoscopists. Conclusions: The AFS endoscopic classification of the EGJ expands on the Hill classification by including assessment of axial hiatal hernia length (L), hiatal aperture diameter (D), and presence or absence of the flap valve (F) making it more comprehensive - LDF components. Future directions include validation studies correlating the ability of the AFS classification in predicting the presence and severity of GERD.

Abstract We present the case of a 46-year-old male with medically complicated class III obesity who presented with new-onset and persistent dysphagia after undergoing a successful laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. An esophagogastroduodenoscopy was unrevealing, however, further workup with the endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) device was suggestive of esophageal dysmotility with decreased distensibility index of the GE junction and absent/disorganized secondary esophageal peristalsis. Thorough chart review was performed to elicit details of the case presentation. Further, a literature review was performed to supplement background knowledge and discussion. We present a case of symptomatic esophageal dysphagia in a post-procedural bariatric surgery patient with normal EGD yet positive findings on functional lumen imaging, consistent with the newly described entity termed Post Obesity Surgery Esophageal Dysfunction (POSED). POSED is defined by aperistalsis and increased intragastric pressure seen after bariatric surgery. It is thought to occur due to a high-pressure gastric zone created in the noncompliant postoperative stomach after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or an increased esophageal afterload by a restrictive laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. No treatment guidelines exist, though options include botulinum toxin, dilation, and per-oral esophageal myotomy. This case provides further insight into the role that functional lumen imaging has in the bariatric patient, as it may be able to more accurately detect patients who will develop esophageal dysmotility following bariatric surgery, or perhaps even those who may be predisposed prior to undergoing intervention for weight loss.

Background Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a recognized, safe bariatric procedure with minimal complications. Marginal ulceration, however, remains a challenging problem with an incidence of 8-12%. While chronic NSAID use is an established risk factor for ulcer formation, aspirin use itself as a cause for marginal ulceration is still unclear. We aim to compare the rates of marginal ulceration in RYGB with and without aspirin use. Methods PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for articles between 2008 and 2021 by two independent reviewers using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). The risk of bias was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was conducted using a fixed-effect model. Results From 5324 studies screened, we included 3 studies. Two studies had a low risk of bias, and the other one presented a high risk of bias on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We included 24,770 patients, 1911 with aspirin use and 22,859 without aspirin use. After the meta-analysis, patients who used aspirin had a significantly higher marginal ulceration rate than those who did not (OR = 1.33 [95% CI 1.08 to 1.63], P < .002; I 2 = 39%). Conclusions Aspirin use is associated with increased rates of marginal ulceration after RYGB.

AbstractObjectiveSatiety, defined as the duration of the sensation of fullness, is usually measured by validated visual analog scales (VAS) for appetite. Gastric function plays a key role in food intake regulation. However, the association between gastric emptying (GE) and VAS appetite is unknown.MethodsIn this cross‐sectional study, 134 participants (mean [SEM] age = 39 [0.8] years, mean [SEM] BMI = 38 [0.5] kg/m2, 67% females) completed simultaneous measurements of GE and VAS appetite. After a 320‐kcal meal, GE was measured by scintigraphy and appetite by validated 100‐mm VAS for 240 minutes. Satiation was defined as calories consumed to terminate meal and was measured by an ad libitum meal. GE, VAS, and ad libitum meal tests were measured on the same day. Percent of meal retention in the stomach, VAS area under curve (AUC0‐240 min), and overall appetite score (OAS) were calculated. Pearson correlation (ρ) determined the association of GE with VAS appetite and satiation. Appetite components were also analyzed by quartiles based on GE120 min.ResultsGE120 min was correlated with sensation of VAS hungerAUC(0‐240 min) (ρ = 0.24, p = 0.004), fullnessAUC(0‐240 min) (ρ = 0.16, p = 0.05), and OASAUC(0‐240 min) (ρ = 0.20, p = 0.02). Patients with rapid GE120 min had a mean increase in VAS hungerAUC(0‐240 min) by 32 mm/min (15.62%, p = 0.03) compared with normal/slow GE120 min.ConclusionsGE is associated with the sensations of appetite, and rapid GE is associated with increased appetite, which may contribute to weight gain.

ObjectiveLittle is known about the predictors of response to obesity interventions.MethodsIn 450 participants with obesity, body composition, resting energy expenditure, satiety, satiation, eating behavior, affect, and physical activity were measured by validated studies and questionnaires. These variables were used to classify obesity phenotypes. Subsequently, in a 12‐month, pragmatic, real‐world trial performed in a weight management center, 312 patients were randomly assigned to phenotype‐guided treatment or non‐phenotype‐guided treatment with antiobesity medications: phentermine, phentermine/topiramate, bupropion/naltrexone, lorcaserin, and liraglutide. The primary outcome was weight loss at 12 months.ResultsFour phenotypes of obesity were identified in 383 of 450 participants (85%): hungry brain (abnormal satiation), emotional hunger (hedonic eating), hungry gut (abnormal satiety), and slow burn (decreased metabolic rate). In 15% of participants, no phenotype was identified. Two or more phenotypes were identified in 27% of patients. In the pragmatic clinical trial, the phenotype‐guided approach was associated with 1.75‐fold greater weight loss after 12 months with mean weight loss of 15.9% compared with 9.0% in the non‐phenotype‐guided group (difference −6.9% [95% CI −9.4% to −4.5%], P < 0.001), and the proportion of patients who lost >10% at 12 months was 79% in the phenotype‐guided group compared with 34% with non‐phenotype‐guided treatment group.ConclusionsBiological and behavioral phenotypes elucidate human obesity heterogeneity and can be targeted pharmacologically to enhance weight loss.

SummaryBackgroundThe Food and Drug Administration has approved several pharmacotherapies for the treatment of obesity. This study assesses the cost‐effectiveness of six pharmacotherapies and lifestyle intervention for people with mild obesity (body mass indices [BMIs] 30 to 35).MethodsA microsimulation model was constructed to compare seven weight loss strategies plus no treatment: intensive lifestyle intervention, orlistat, phentermine, phentermine/topiramate, lorcaserin, liraglutide, and semaglutide. Weight loss, quality‐of‐life scores, and costs were estimated using clinical trials and other published literature. Endpoints included costs, quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios (ICERs) with a willingness‐to‐pay (WTP) threshold of $100 000/QALY. Results were analysed at 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year time horizons.ResultsAt each of the three follow‐up periods, phentermine was the cost‐effective strategy, with ICERs of $46 258/QALY, $20 157/QALY, and $17 880/QALY after 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Semaglutide was the most effective strategy in the 3‐ and 5‐year time horizons, with total QALYs of 2.224 and 3.711, respectively. However, the ICERs were prohibitively high at $1 437 340/QALY after 3 years and $576 931/QALY after 5 years. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated these results were robust.ConclusionsPhentermine is the cost‐effective pharmacologic weight‐loss strategy. Although semaglutide is the most effective, it is not cost‐effective because of its high price.

INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery (BRS) is an effective weight loss method that should, in theory, improve many gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic (GILP) diseases seen with obesity. At the same time, there is an increased morbidity related to BRS’s gastrointestinal alterations. Thus, we examined the short-term impact of BRS type on admission rates of various GILP diseases. METHODS: We queried the 2012-2014 Nationwide Readmission Database to identify obese patients who underwent vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), or, as a control, hernia repair surgery (HR). Our primary aim was to compare rates of GILP diseases within 6 months post- and 6 months pre-surgery in the VSG, RYGB, and HR cohorts. In a time to event analysis we evaluated readmission rates up to 11 months post-BRS. RESULTS: We identified a total of 140,103 patients in the VSG cohort, 132,253 patients in the RYGB cohort, and 12,436 patients in the HR cohort. HR patients were slightly older with a higher percentage of Medicare insurance carriers in contrast to VSG and RYGB (Table 1). RYGB was associated with a 33-fold increased risk of intestinal obstructions compared to pre-RYGB ( P < 0.001). Other notably increased GILP diseases after RYGB from highest to lowest risk (Table 2): C. difficile infection [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 12.52, P < 0.001], GI hemorrhage (aOR: 10.95, P < 0.001), biliary disease (aOR: 4.15, P < 0.001) and functional/motility disorders (aOR: 3.57, P < 0.001). In contrast, post- versus pre-VSG patients were most frequently admitted for acute pancreatitis (aOR: 6.26, P < 0.001), followed by C. difficile infection (aOR: 4.86, P < 0.001), biliary disease (aOR: 3.14, P < 0.001), noninfectious gastroenteritis (aOR: 3.05, P < 0.001) and functional/motility disorders (aOR: 2.74, P < 0.001). No increase in admissions was observed in the control HR cohort for any of these diseases. In our time to event analysis, the probability of being admitted was most notable for intestinal obstructions within 30 days after RYGB while functional disorders predominate afterwards (Figure 1). Similarly, patients were more frequently admitted for functional disorders following VSG. CONCLUSION: The type of BRS has a differential impact on GILP admissions after surgery. There may be a limited impact of weight loss on functional disorders that seem to dominate irrespective of BRS type. This data can help better inform patients on the choice of surgery to pursue, however more data are warranted.

Abstract Background and aims Benign gastrointestinal (GI) strictures are often refractory to standard endoscopic interventions. Fully covered coaxial lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have emerged as a novel therapy for these strictures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LAMS for refractory GI strictures. Patients and methods A retrospective analysis was performed for patients who underwent LAMS placement for benign luminal strictures in three US centers between January 2014 and December 2016. The primary outcomes were technical success and initial clinical success of LAMS placement. Secondary outcomes were stent migration, rate of re-intervention, and adverse events. Results A total of 49 patients underwent 56 LAMS placement procedures. Previous treatment had failed in 39 patients (79.6 %), and anastomotic strictures were the indication in 77.6 % (38/49), with the most common site being gastrojejunal (34.7 % [17/49]). Technical success was achieved in all procedures and initial clinical success was achieved in 96.4 % of all procedures (54/56). Patient initial clinical success was 95.9 % (47/49). Stent migration occurred in 17.9 % of procedures, and was more likely to occur at sites in the lower GI tract (P = 0.02). The mean stent dwell time was 100.6 days, and the mean follow-up was 169.8 days. Minor adverse events, not requiring hospitalization, occurred in 33.9 % of procedures, including subsequent stricture progression (10.7 %). In cases where LAMS were removed, mean follow-up time was 102.2 days. The re-intervention rate was 75 % at 300 days follow-up after stent removal. Of the LAMS placed at anastomotic strictures, 36.4 % required re-intervention, with approximately two-thirds of these re-interventions requiring placement of a new stent or surgery. Conclusion LAMS placement was successful for the management of refractory GI strictures, with good technical and initial clinical success rates. However, re-intervention rates after LAMS removal were high, and many strictures were not resolved by an extended period of stenting with these coaxial stents. LAMS placement offers additional therapeutic options and in selected cases might be considered a destination therapy for patients with recalcitrant benign strictures.