ZusammenfassungZielIn den letzten zehn Jahren hat sich unser Verständnis der Gesichtsanatomie gewandelt. Neuere minimalinvasive Eingriffe zur Gesichtsverjüngung erfordern bessere anatomische Kenntnisse.Material und MethodenIn dieser narrativen Übersichtsarbeit wird die aktuelle Literatur mit den Erfahrungen der Autoren zusammengefasst und analysiert. Sie resümiert den aktuellen Wissenstand zu oberflächlichen und tiefen fazialen Fettkompartimenten und deren Bedeutung für minimalinvasive Eingriffe am Gesicht. Ein schematisches Modell zum besseren Verständnis der komplexen Anatomie des Gesichts wurde erstellt.ErgebnisseDas Gesicht ist aus den folgenden fünf Schichten aufgebaut: Schicht 1: Haut; Schicht 2: subkutanes Fettgewebe mit Retinacula cutis (aus fibrösem Bindegewebe), Schicht 3: superfizielles muskuloaponeurotisches System (SMAS), Schicht 4: tiefes Fettgewebe und Schicht 5: Periost oder tiefe Faszie. Dieser Aufbau unterscheidet sich je nach Region, insbesondere, wenn die Ligamente in das Modell einbezogen werden. Die fazialen Fettkompartimente sind in den Schichten 2 und 4 lokalisiert. Jede Schicht hat einzigartige Merkmale und spezielle räumliche Beziehungen zu den umgebenden Geweben.SchlussfolgerungenDas neue Konzept des geschichteten Aufbaus erklärt die räumlichen Beziehungen und das funktionale Zusammenwirken der Weichteilgewebe im Gesicht. Die Kenntnis der Schichten sowie der genauen Lage der oberflächlichen und tiefen Fettkompartimente des Gesichts und ihrer Begrenzungen ist entscheidend für die sichere und effektive Durchführung minimalinvasiver Eingriffe am Gesicht.
The Superficial Face Dissection as an Example for Integrating Clinical Approaches, Authentic Learning, and Changing Perspectives in Anatomy Dissection
Hands‐on dissection‐based learning of anatomy offers an unique and valued experience for medical students. Too often however, the inexperienced student's focus is to avoid damage to unfamiliar structures instead of understanding spatial relationships between structures. This results in unfortunate surrender of a critical learning experience. Additionally, approaches to dissection and anatomic exposure share little alignment to clinical approaches, making it less powerful in clinical applicability. The goal of this viewpoint commentary is based on the experience of the two authors and aims to demonstrate opportunity to introduce clinical approaches for dissection while incorporating relevant anatomical concepts in medical school curriculum that aligns with authentic healthcare practice. Using the dissections of the superficial face as a relevant and current topic of clinical interest, we point out that applying the currently performed dissection approach (medial‐to‐lateral) falls short of providing sufficient knowledge and understanding of the layered arrangement of facial structures. The lateral‐to‐medial approach, as performed in surgical face lifting procedures would offer a better understanding of the layers of the face and especially the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) accounting for the difficulties of facial dissections on embalmed cadavers. This commentary could offer a potential change in paradigm for students and course facilitators for how to maximize the knowledge transfer during facial dissections. It potentially opens a door to rethink dissection‐based learning of anatomy toward techniques and approaches that are aligned to surgical access pathways and thus considered more clinically relevant.
Reappraisal of Perforasomes of the Superficial Femoral, Descending Genicular, and Saphenous Arteries and Clinical Applications to Locoregional Reconstruction
Background: The superficial femoral artery and medial thigh region has been an underused donor site for perforator flaps. This study evaluated perforasomes of the superficial femoral artery and its principal branches to review the clinical applications for locoregional reconstruction. Methods: Twenty-six fresh cadaveric lower extremities were dissected. Perforator size and anatomical course from the superficial femoral artery, descending genicular artery, and saphenous artery branch were documented. Perforators were selectively injected with iodinated contrast to assess vascular territories using computed tomography. A retrospective chart review was conducted on consecutive patients (2014 to 2015). Results: One hundred thirty perforators were mapped in the medial thigh region. Eleven extended medial thigh perforator flaps and 15 hemicircumferential flaps were harvested. The mean distance from the joint line was 16.7 ± 7.3 cm. Perforators arose from the superficial femoral artery (62 percent), saphenous artery branch (23 percent), and descending genicular artery (15 percent). Superficial femoral artery perforators were located around the mid and proximal thigh region (p < 0.001). The median perforasome surface area was 244 cm2, representing 36 percent in hemithigh flaps with preferential filling in the anteromedial region. Proximal perforasomes were the smallest. Perforasome areas based on vessel origin were comparable; however, saphenous artery perforators had a broader perforasome compared with descending genicular (p = 0.01) and superficial femoral artery perforators (p = 0.04). Six clinical case examples were presented for knee, thigh, and lower leg reconstruction. Conclusions: The superficial femoral artery or its branches can provide nontraditional reconstructive perforator flap options in regional reconstruction. They can be simple to harvest using a free-style approach, do not require preoperative imaging, offer a one-stage reconstructive method with low morbidity, and obviate the need for microsurgery or muscle flaps.
Anatomy of the Facial Fat Compartments and their Relevance in Aesthetic Surgery
SummaryObjectiveThere has been a significant shift in the understanding of facial anatomy during the last decade. Newer minimally invasive therapeutic options for facial rejuvenation procedures are increasing the need for a better knowledge of anatomy.Material and MethodsThe current literature is summarized, analyzed and presented along with the experience of the author for this narrative review, which summarizes the current understanding of the superficial and deep facial fat compartments and their relevance for minimally invasive facial procedures. A schematic facial model was created in order to facilitate a better understanding of the complexity of facial anatomy.ResultsThe face is arranged in five layers as follows: layer 1: skin; layer 2: subcutaneous fat including the retinacula cutis (composed of fibrous connective tissue); layer 3: superficial musculo‐aponeurotic system (SMAS); layer 4: deep fat; and layer 5: periosteum or deep fascia. This arrangement varies between facial regions, especially when the line of ligaments is incorporated into the model. The facial fat compartments are located in layers 2 and 4; each layer has unique characteristics and spatial relationships with the surrounding tissues.ConclusionsThe concept of the layered arrangement is a new way to understand the spatial relationship and functional interplay of the soft tissues of the face. Understanding the layers, the precise location of the superficial and deep facial fat compartments and their boundaries is crucial for the conduct of safe and effective minimally invasive facial procedures.
In Pursuit of Excellence Reconsidered: Expertise and Expert Performance in the Teaching, Learning, and Application of Anatomy
Vascularity of the Proximal Fibula and Its Implications in Vascularized Epiphyseal Transfer: An Anatomical and High-Resolution Computed Tomographic Angiography Study
Background: Various vascular pedicles have been used to supply the proximal fibula for vascularized epiphyseal transfer. The optimal pedicle has, however, not been agreed on. This study aimed to describe the detailed vascular anatomy of the proximal fibula to assist the surgeon in choosing the optimal pedicle. Methods: Twenty-eight lower extremities were injected with latex or a mixture of latex and barium sulfate. Vessels supplying the proximal fibula were identified and dissected, and the course, diameter, anatomical relations, length, and branches were documented. In the barium group, high-resolution computed tomographic scanning was conducted before dissection. In seven specimens, branches of the deep peroneal nerve to the tibialis anterior muscle were carefully preserved, and their relation to the proximal fibular vascularity was noted. Results: An anastomotic vascular network supplied the proximal fibula. This was formed superiorly by branches of the inferior lateral genicular artery, and inferiorly by branches of the anterior tibial artery, the most important of which were the first and second recurrent epiphyseal arteries. One or more deep peroneal nerve branches passed deep to the first recurrent epiphyseal artery in all specimens examined. In five specimens, all of the branches were superficial to the second recurrent epiphyseal artery, whereas two had branches deep to it. Conclusions: The proximal fibula can be transferred using the inferior lateral genicular or anterior tibial artery because of the existing anastomosis. Factors including length of pedicle, potential for nerve injury, and diaphyseal portion to be harvested should be considered in the pedicle choice.
Proposed surgical technique to facilitate targeted reinnervation of the infraspinatus: A cadaveric feasibility study