Day, Gregory S

AbstractOBJECTIVEInvestigation of learning slopes in early‐onset dementias has been limited. The current study aimed to highlight the sensitivity of learning slopes to discriminate disease severity in cognitively normal participants and those diagnosed with early‐onset dementia with and without β‐amyloid positivityMETHODData from 310 participants in the Longitudinal Early‐Onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (aged 41 to 65) were used to calculate learning slope metrics. Learning slopes among diagnostic groups were compared, and the relationships of slopes with standard memory measures were determinedRESULTSWorse learning slopes were associated with more severe disease states, even after controlling for demographics, total learning, and cognitive severity. A particular metric—the learning ratio (LR)—outperformed other learning slope calculations across analysesCONCLUSIONSLearning slopes appear to be sensitive to early‐onset dementias, even when controlling for the effect of total learning and cognitive severity. The LR may be the learning measure of choice for such analyses.Highlights Learning is impaired in amyloid‐positive EOAD, beyond cognitive severity scores alone. Amyloid‐positive EOAD participants perform worse on learning slopes than amyloid‐negative participants. Learning ratio appears to be the learning metric of choice for EOAD participants.

AbstractBACKGROUNDThe Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) is a longitudinal observational study that collects data on cognition, blood pressure (BP), and other variables from autosomal‐dominant Alzheimer's disease mutation carriers (MCs) and non‐carrier (NC) family members in early to mid‐adulthood, providing a unique opportunity to evaluate BP and cognition relationships in these populations.METHODWe examined cross‐sectional and longitudinal relationships between systolic and diastolic BP and cognition in DIAN MC and NC.RESULTSData were available from 528 participants, who had a mean age of 38 (SD = 11) and were 42% male and 61% MCs, at a median follow‐up of 2 years. Linear‐multilevel models found only cross‐sectional associations in the MC group between higher systolic BP and poorer performance on language (β = −0.181 [−0.318, −0.044]), episodic memory (−0.212 [−0.375, −0.049]), and a composite cognitive measure (−0.146 [−0.276, −0.015]). In NCs, the relationship was cross‐sectional only and present for language alone.DISCUSSIONHigher systolic BP was cross‐sectionally but not longitudinally associated with poorer cognition, particularly in MCs. BP may influence cognition gradually, but further longitudinal research is needed.