Landman, Bennett A

OBJECTIVES: Assess clinical outcomes following PICU Liberation ABCDEF Bundle utilization. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, cohort study. SETTING: Eight academic PICUs. PATIENTS: Children greater than 2 months with expected PICU stay greater than 2 days and need for mechanical ventilation (MV). INTERVENTIONS: ABCDEF Bundle implementation. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Over an 11-month period (3-mo baseline, 8-mo implementation), Bundle utilization was measured for 622 patients totaling 5,017 PICU days. Risk of mortality was quantified for 532 patients (4,275 PICU days) for correlation between Bundle utilization and MV duration, PICU length of stay (LOS), delirium incidence, and mortality. Utilization was analyzed as subject-specific (entire PICU stay) and day-specific (single PICU day). Median overall subject-specific utilization increased from 50% during the 3-month baseline to 63.9% during the last four implementation months ( p < 0.001). Subject-specific utilization for elements A and C did not change; utilization improved for B (0–12.5%; p = 0.007), D (22.2–61.1%; p < 0.001), E (17.7–50%; p = 0.003), and F (50–79.2%; p = 0.001). We observed no association between Bundle utilization and MV duration, PICU LOS, or delirium incidence. In contrast, on adjusted analysis, every 10% increase in subject-specific utilization correlated with mortality odds ratio (OR) reduction of 34%, p < 0.001; every 10% increase in day-specific utilization correlated with a mortality OR reduction of 1.4% ( p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: ABCDEF Bundle is applicable to children. Although enhanced Bundle utilization correlated with decreased mortality, increased utilization did not correlate with duration of MV, PICU LOS, or delirium incidence. Additional research in the domains of comparative effectiveness, implementation science, and human factors engineering is required to understand this clinical inconsistency and optimize PICU Liberation concept integration into clinical practice.

Abstract Purpose: Treatment options are limited beyond JAK inhibitors for patients with primary myelofibrosis (MF) or secondary MF. Preclinical studies have revealed that PI3Kδ inhibition cooperates with ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, to reduce proliferation and induce apoptosis of JAK2V617F-mutant cell lines. Patients and Methods: In a phase I dose-escalation and -expansion study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of a selective PI3Kδ inhibitor, umbralisib, in combination with ruxolitinib in patients with MF who had a suboptimal response or lost response to ruxolitinib. Enrolled subjects were required to be on a stable dose of ruxolitinib for ≥8 weeks and continue that MTD at study enrollment. The recommended dose of umbralisib in combination with ruxolitinib was determined using a modified 3+3 dose-escalation design. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy outcomes were evaluated, and spleen size was measured with a novel automated digital atlas. Results: Thirty-seven patients with MF (median age, 67 years) with prior exposure to ruxolitinib were enrolled. A total of 2 patients treated with 800 mg umbralisib experienced reversible grade 3 asymptomatic pancreatic enzyme elevation, but no dose-limiting toxicities were seen at lower umbralisib doses. Two patients (5%) achieved a durable complete response, and 12 patients (32%) met the International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment response criteria of clinical improvement. With a median follow-up of 50.3 months for censored patients, overall survival was greater than 70% after 3 years of follow-up. Conclusions: Adding umbralisib to ruxolitinib in patients was well tolerated and may resensitize patients with MF to ruxolitinib without unacceptable rates of adverse events seen with earlier generation PI3Kδ inhibitors. Randomized trials testing umbralisib in the treatment of MF should be pursued.

Purpose Diffusion‐weighted imaging allows investigators to identify structural, microstructural, and connectivity‐based differences between subjects, but variability due to session and scanner biases is a challenge. Methods To investigate DWI variability, we present MASiVar, a multisite data set consisting of 319 diffusion scans acquired at 3 T from b = 1000 to 3000 s/mm 2 across 14 healthy adults, 83 healthy children (5 to 8 years), three sites, and four scanners as a publicly available, preprocessed, and de‐identified data set. With the adult data, we demonstrate the capacity of MASiVar to simultaneously quantify the intrasession, intersession, interscanner, and intersubject variability of four common DWI processing approaches: (1) a tensor signal representation, (2) a multi‐compartment neurite orientation dispersion and density model, (3) white‐matter bundle segmentation, and (4) structural connectomics. Respectively, we evaluate region‐wise fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and principal eigenvector; region‐wise CSF volume fraction, intracellular volume fraction, and orientation dispersion index; bundle‐wise shape, volume, fractional anisotropy, and length; and whole connectome correlation and maximized modularity, global efficiency, and characteristic path length. Results We plot the variability in these measures at each level and find that it consistently increases with intrasession to intersession to interscanner to intersubject effects across all processing approaches and that sometimes interscanner variability can approach intersubject variability. Conclusions This study demonstrates the potential of MASiVar to more globally investigate DWI variability across multiple levels and processing approaches simultaneously and suggests harmonization between scanners for multisite analyses should be considered before inference of group differences on subjects.

Abstract This study assessed the inter-user reproducibility of Computer-Aided Nodule Assessment and Risk Yield (CANARY), a novel analytical tool that risk stratifies lung adenocarcinomas (ADCs) according to defined computed tomography (CT) structural characteristics. CANARY detects nine distinct voxel signatures in ADCs based on standard CT imaging, thereby defining nodule characteristics correlating with patient outcomes, and corresponding to invasion or lepidic growth histologically. A software user segments the borders of each ADC prior to voxel analysis, introducing potential variability into the assessment. While CANARY is a promising method, it requires validation of the analytical variability between users and prediction of accuracy in an independent cohort. To evaluate the reproducibility of CANARY analysis, three independent users who are not part of the CANARY development team segmented and analyzed 50 biopsy-confirmed primary lung ADCs from Vanderbilt University Medical Center. The CT scans of ADCs were selected retrospectively based on the following criteria: ADC-histology proven on biopsy, diagnosed between 2009-2015, less than 3cm in greatest diameter, and stages IA-IV. Users followed a standard operating procedure established at the Mayo Clinic, and were blinded to clinical characteristics and patient outcomes. Results: To measure inter-user variability of ADC voxel composition, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated based upon the percentage of each voxel subtype within the whole ADC. An ICC of 1 reflects high reproducibility between users. Amongst all 50 ADCs, the average ICC for all nine voxel types was 0.828 (95% CI 0.76, 0.895). The ICC of the four voxel types associated with invasive features on CT was 0.865 (95% CI 0.805, 0.924). ICCs were also calculated using a logarithmic transformation for data normalization, generating an ICC of 0.745 (95% CI 0.663, 0.826) for all nine voxel types, and an ICC of 0.995 (95% CI 0.993, 0.997) for the four voxel types associated with invasion. Conclusions: (1) CANARY analysis of lung ADC voxel signatures appears to be reproducible amongst users, making it a reliable tool for the evaluation of ADC voxel density. (2) Correlation of invasive signatures associated with more aggressive ADCs was nearly perfect amongst users. Additional validation metrics for CANARY with larger datasets are being evaluated, including the accuracy of tumor prognostic predictions between users and analysis of ADC datasets from other institutions. Citation Format: Erica C. Nakajima, Michael P. Frankland, Tucker Johnson, Sanja L. Antic, Ronald A. Karwoski, Bennett Landman, Heidi Chen, Ronald C. Walker, Brian J. Bartholmai, Tobias Peikert, Srinivasan Rajagopalan, Pierre P. Massion, Fabien Maldonado. Assessing the reproducibility of computer-aided nodule assessment and risk yield (CANARY) method to characterize lung adenocarcinomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3723. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-3723