Back to Authors

Verschraegen, Claire F

0000-0001-6544-3089

Mayo Clinic

The Ohio State University

Citations 5

Quality of life and patient‐reported toxicities in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma treated with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without stereotactic body radiation therapy
Hoogland, Aasha I. , Michael, Lauren, Wuthrick, Evan , Eroglu, Zeynep , Blakaj, Dukagjin , Jim, Heather , Kim, Sungjune, Jim, Heather S L , Brohl, Andrew S. , Small, Brent J. , Verschraegen, Claire F , Khushalani, Nikhil I.

Cancer Medicine | July 18, 2024 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 14 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/cam4.7464 Get It

AbstractBackgroundMerkel cell carcinoma is a rare skin cancer associated with poor survival. Based on a previous Phase II trial of adults with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma by Kim and colleagues (2022), there is now a strong rationale for combination therapy (i.e., nivolumab and ipilimumab) to become a treatment option for patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma. The goal of this paper was to report on the secondary outcome of quality of life (QOL) among patients on this trial.MethodsPatients receiving combined nivolumab and ipilimumab, with or without stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ‐C30 prior to starting treatment and every 2 weeks thereafter. Changes in QOL during treatment and post‐treatment were evaluated using piecewise random‐effects mixed models. Exploratory analyses compared changes in QOL between study arms. The original trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03071406).ResultsStudy participants (n = 50) reported no changes in overall QOL (ps > 0.05), but emotional functioning improved during treatment (p = 0.01). Cognitive and social functioning worsened post‐treatment (ps < 0.01). In general, patients treated with combination therapy only (n = 25) reported no change in QOL over time, whereas patients also treated with SBRT (n = 25) consistently demonstrated worsening QOL post‐treatment.ConclusionQOL is generally preserved in patients treated with combination therapy, but the addition of SBRT may worsen QOL. Combined with clinical efficacy data published previously, results support the use of combination therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab as a treatment option for patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma.
De-correlating immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicity and response in melanoma via the microbiome.
Williams, Nyelia , Husain, Marium , Lynn, Mari, Bibi, Amna , Conrad, Bailey, Gray, Shannon, Bodnar, Michael, Arya, Namrata , Roberts, Scott, Hoang, Phuong , Apparicio, Jessica, Merrill, Deanna, Kendra, Kari , Wheeler, Caroline E. , Hoyd, Rebecca , Meara, Alexa Simon , Bodnar, Michael, Roberts, Scott, Merrill, Deanna, Wu, Richard Cheng Han , Verschraegen, Claire F , Burd, Christin Elizabeth , Spakowicz, Daniel

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 4, 2023 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 9569-9569

10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.9569 Get It

9569 Background: Immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) immunotherapy increases survival in patients with melanoma. Yet only half of the patients respond, and 10-40% of patients experience immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Previous studies have found a correlation between the development of an irAE and treatment response. Modifying the gut microbiome could positively affect response to ICIs and reduce toxicities. We sought to determine if the microbiome at the onset of treatment, during an irAE, and at 12 weeks, can predict the response or toxicity during ICI treatment for metastatic melanoma. Methods: Melanoma patients (pts) > 18 yo treated with ICI enrolled in a prospective observational cohort study at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Skin Cancer Clinic. Excluded were patients on corticosteroids at the start of ICI cycle 1, except for adrenal physiologic replacement. Stools were collected at baseline, within 2 days of an adverse event assessed by physician chart review using CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) v5.0, and at 12 weeks. Response (ORR) to ICIs was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1) q12 weeks and progression-free survival recorded. Metagenomic whole-genome shotgun sequencing was performed on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 and classified using HUMAnN3. The effect of microbe relative abundances on irAEs was modeled by logistic regression with the R package glmm. Results: Of the 88 patients enrolled, 48 had metastatic disease with 32 assessable for response. ORR at 12 weeks was 28% (1 CR, 8 PR, 17 SD, and 6 PD) and 24 patients showed PFS at 12 months. Grade > 2 irAEs were observed in 11/48 pts. Abundance of Bacteroides dorei (False Discovery Rate Corrected p-value = 9.5E-07) and Blautia species CAG:257 (padj = 0.001) were enriched in responders, Prevotella Stercorea (padj = 1.1E-07) and a phage with a predicted target of Salmonella (padj = 8.3E-09) in non-responders. Responders with an irAE had enrichment of Bacteroides plebeius (padj = 4.2E-13) and Bacteroides coprophilus (padj = 0.0002) whereas responders without irAE had enrichment of Eubacterium siraeum (padj = 7.2E-05). Conclusions: Longitudinal and event-driven biospecimen collection in patients treated with ICIs showed several bacteria and viruses but no fungi associated with response, with and without the development of an irAE. The abundance of the two high-taxonomic rank microbe groups is significantly associated with irAEs. The association with the Bacteroides Genus is consistent with previous studies and is associated with response to ICIs. A microbiome abundant in Bacteroides and lacking Prevotella is associated with response to ICI. An abundance of Bacteroides could be a biomarker for irAEs, and an abundance of Eubacterium, a biomarker for response without irAEs. Future analyses are necessary to assign causal roles for microbe biomarkers with specific irAEs. Clinical trial information: NCT05102773 .
Impact of the Immediate Release of Clinical Information Rules on Health Care Delivery to Patients With Cancer
Anyidoho, P. Abena , Markham, Merry Jennifer , Alberts, Steven R. , Sweetenham, John , Cameron, Kendra , Verschraegen, Claire F , Markham, Merry J , Alberts, Steven R , Cameron, Kendra , Hejleh, Taher Abu

JCO Oncology Practice | February 13, 2023 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 5 | Pages: e706-e713

10.1200/op.22.00712 Get It

PURPOSE: The 21st Century Cures Act mandates the immediate release of clinical information (IRCI) to patients. Immediate sharing of sensitive test results to patients with cancer might have serious unintended consequences for patients and providers. METHODS: A 22-question REDCap survey was designed by the Association of American Cancer Institutes Physician Clinical Leadership Initiative Steering Committee to explore oncology providers' opinions on IRCI policy implementation. It was administered twice in 2021 with a 3-month interval. A third survey with a single question seeking providers' opinions about their adaptation to the IRCI mandate was administered 1 year later to those who had responded to the earlier surveys. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics such as chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. The survey was sent to all Association of American Cancer Institutes cancer center members. In the first or second administration, 167 practitioners answered the survey; 31 responded to the third survey. RESULTS: Three quarters of the providers did not favor the new requirement for IRCI and 62% encountered questions from patients about results being sent to them without provider interpretation. Only half of the hospitals had a plan in place to deal with the new IRCI requirements. A third survey, for longitudinal follow-up, indicated a more favorable trend toward adoption of IRCI. CONCLUSION: IRCI for patients with cancer was perceived negatively by academic oncology providers after its implementation. It was viewed to be associated with higher levels of patient anxiety and complaints about the care delivered. Providers preferred to discuss test results with patients before release.
Phase II Randomized Study of CMB305 and Atezolizumab Compared With Atezolizumab Alone in Soft-Tissue Sarcomas Expressing NY-ESO-1
Chawla, Sant P., Tine, Brian A. Van , Pollack, Seth M., Ganjoo, Kristen N., Elias, Anthony , Riedel, Richard F. , Attia, Steven, Choy, Edwin , Okuno, Scott H., Agulnik, Mark , Livingston, Michael B., Keedy, Vicki L. , Philip, Tony , Bohac, G. Chet, Yurasov, Sergey , Yakovich, Adam, Lu, Hailing , Chen, Michael, Maki, Robert G. , Van Tine, Brian A , Elias, Anthony D , von Mehren, Margaret , Keedy, Vicki L , Verschraegen, Claire F , Philip, Tony , Yurasov, Sergey , Lu, Hailing , Maki, Robert G , Choy, Edwin , Riedel, Richard F , Chawla, Sant P., Pollack, Seth M., Ganjoo, Kristen N., Attia, Steven, Okuno, Scott H., Agulnik, Mark , Livingston, Michael B., Bohac, G. Chet, Yakovich, Adam, Chen, Michael

Journal of Clinical Oncology | July 14, 2021 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1291-1300

10.1200/jco.20.03452 Get It

PURPOSE CMB305 is a heterologous prime-boost vaccination regimen created to prime NY-ESO-1–specific CD8 T-cell populations and then activate the immune response with a potent TLR-4 agonist. This open-label randomized phase II trial was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of adding the CMB305 regimen to atezolizumab (anti–programmed death ligand-1 therapy) in comparison with atezolizumab alone in patients with synovial sarcoma or myxoid liposarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with locally advanced, relapsed, or metastatic synovial sarcoma or myxoid liposarcoma (any grade) were randomly assigned to receive CMB305 with atezolizumab (experimental arm) or atezolizumab alone (control arm). The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Safety and immune responses were assessed. RESULTS A total of 89 patients were enrolled; 55.1% had received ≥ 2 prior lines of chemotherapy. Median PFS was 2.6 months and 1.6 months in the combination and control arms, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.6 to 1.3). Median OS was 18 months in both treatment arms. Patients treated with combination therapy had a significantly higher rate of treatment-induced NY-ESO-1–specific T cells ( P = .01) and NY-ESO-1–specific antibody responses ( P < .0001). In a post hoc analysis of all dosed patients, OS was longer (36 months) in the subset who developed anti-NY-ESO-1 T-cell immune response (hazard ratio, 0.3; P = .02). CONCLUSION Although the combination of CMB305 and atezolizumab did not result in significant increases in PFS or OS compared with atezolizumab alone, some patients demonstrated evidence of an anti-NY-ESO-1 immune response and appeared to fare better by imaging than those without such an immune response. Combining prime-boost vaccines such as CMB305 with anti–programmed death ligand-1 therapies merits further evaluation in other clinical contexts.
A phase II randomized study of CMB305 and atezolizumab versus atezolizumab in NY-ESO-1+ soft tissue sarcoma: Analysis of immunogenicity, tumor control, and patient survival.
Chawla, Sant P. , Tine, Brian Andrew Van, Ganjoo, Kristen N. , Attia, Steven , Okuno, Scott H. , Agulnik, Mark , Livingston, Michael B. , Keedy, Vicki L. , Philip, Tony , Bohac, Gerry C., Yurasov, Sergey , Lu, Hailing , Pollack, Seth M. , Elias, Anthony , Riedel, Richard F. , Choy, Edwin , Mehren, Margaret von , Verschraegen, Claire F , Chen, Michael J. , Maki, Robert G.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 12, 2020 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 11011-11011

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.11011 Get It

11011 Background: CMB305 (C) is an immunotherapy designed to generate an anti-NY-ESO-1 immune response (IR). C consists of a dendritic cell-targeting lentiviral vector encoding NY-ESO-1 gene (LV305), and a TLR-4 agonist NY-ESO-1 recombinant protein plus GLA-SE (G305). A Phase 1 study demonstrated C is safe, generates IR and conveys a median overall survival (mOS) of 23.7 months (15.5, not reached [NR]) for soft tissue sarcomas & 29.2 months (12.2, NR) for synovial sarcoma (SS) (ESMO 2018). We evaluated efficacy and safety of C and atezolizumab (A) vs A alone in NY-ESO-1+ SS and myxoid round cell liposarcoma (MRCL). Methods: A prospective randomized open label phase 2 study of C (LV305 Intradermal Days 0, 14, 42, 70 + G305 Intramuscular Days 28, 56, 84 then q 6wk up to one year (yr)) + A (1200mg IV q3wk) vs A alone in advanced NY-ESO-1+ SS/MRCL. Primary endpoints of OS and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints of safety, IR, and response rate and post hoc analysis by line of therapy. Results: 88 patients (pts) were enrolled and dosed. Arm C+A: median age 48 yrs, 73% SS, 98% relapsed metastatic, 73% ≥2 prior lines chemotherapy; Arm A: 47 yrs, 67% SS, 84% relapsed metastatic, 53% ≥2 prior lines chemotherapy. Most treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) Grade 1/2, no treatment related deaths. Summary of clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Despite no major differences in PFS and OS between the treatment arms (Arm C+A had more advanced disease and more prior lines of chemotherapy), Arm A +C achieved PRs, a higher level of anti-NY-ESO-1 IR, and pts with IR had numerically superior outcomes. Moreover, the clinical benefit of C+A in earlier lines of therapy warrant further study. Clinical trial information: NCT02609984. [Table: see text]