Back to Authors

Haglin, Jack

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

Citations 4

Increased Musculoskeletal Injury Risk Without Impact on Statistical In-Game Performance Within 90 Days From Concussion Among Professional Basketball Athletes
Parmar, Romir , Tummala, Sailesh V. , Haglin, Jack M. , Haglin, Jack, Tummala, Sailesh V , Morikawa, Landon , Patel, Karan A. , Chhabra, Anikar

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine | March 4, 2025 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1177/23259671251319507 Get It

Background: Concussions have previously been shown to have persistent neurological changes represented by altered reaction time and postural stability in high-level athletes. The effects of concussions on professional basketball players’ performance and subsequent injuries during the 90 days after return to play (RTP) have not been investigated. Purpose/Hypothesis: the purpose of this study was to evaluate player statistical performance and risk of musculoskeletal (MSK) injury within 90 days of RTP from a diagnosed concussion. It was hypothesized that within the 90 days after RTP from a concussion, players would be at a greater risk for MSK injury with an associated decrease in player statistical performance. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: Concussions sustained by National Basketball Association (NBA) players between the 2015-2016 and 2021-2022 seasons, excluding the 2019-2020 season, were evaluated using a publicly available database. The database was queried to identify any MSK injury in the 90-day post-RTP period after a concussion, along with time loss after subsequent injury. Performance statistics were obtained from each player’s preindex season and postindex season, as well as defined time points within the 90-day post-RTP period. Each concussed player was matched 1 to 1 with a nonconcussed control using position, win shares, player efficiency rating, and points per game. MSK injury incidence and player statistics in the concussion group were compared with controls using unpaired Student t tests. Results: A total of 70 concussions were identified in 70 professional basketball players and included in this analysis. A total of 49 players sustained an MSK injury in the 90-day post-RTP period (70%). Compared with controls, the odds of sustaining an MSK injury in the concussed cohort were 11.3 times greater (95% CI, 5.04-25.2; P < .001). Games missed after subsequent MSK injury were similar between the concussed and control groups ( P = .687). Comparisons over the 90-day post-RTP period did not reveal any significant changes in points per game, minutes per game, or true shooting percentage ( P > .05). When compared with controls, no changes in performance statistics were significantly different ( P > .05). Conclusion: Our analysis demonstrates that basketball players who sustain concussions are at a significantly increased risk for subsequent MSK injury within the 90-day post-RTP period but not player performance. Knowledge of this increased risk of MSK injury in concussed athletes can help guide concussion management for proper RTP and targeted rehabilitation in professional basketball players.
Arthroscopic Posterior Capsular Release Improves Range of Motion and Outcomes for Flexion Contracture After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Athletes
Brinkman, Joseph C. , Iturregui, Jose M. , Haglin, Jack M. , Thompson, Adam B. , Makovicka, Justin L. , Haglin, Jack, Makovicka, Justin, Economopoulos, Kostas J. , Moore, M. Lane

Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation | February 22, 2024 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100914 Get It

Purpose To assess outcomes of arthroscopic posterior capsular release among athletes for loss of terminal extension following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed for patients undergoing arthroscopic posterior capsular release for knee extension loss following ACL reconstruction between January 2014 and December 2019. Procedure indications included extension loss greater than 10° at least 3 months after ACL reconstruction that was refractory to physical therapy. Patients were included if they were involved in either high school or college athletics, had complete outcomes of interest, and had at least 2 years of follow‐up. Prospectively collected outcomes included preoperative and postoperative measurement of knee extension, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm score, return to sport data, and complications. Results Eighteen athletes with minimum 2 years of follow‐up who underwent posterior capsular release following ACL reconstruction performed by a single surgeon were included in the analysis. Patients underwent surgery at an average of 16 weeks after ACL reconstruction. Knee extension improved an average of 13.8° at 2 years’ follow‐up (prerelease mean extension deficit 15.1°, postrelease mean extension deficit 1.3°, P < .005). Improvements in the International Knee Documentation Committee score averaged 21.7 at 6 months and 35.0 at 24 months, both of which were statistically significant ( P < .001). Similarly, differences in Lysholm included a significant improvement of 23.0 and 34.2 at 6 months and 2 years, respectively ( P < .001). In total, 77.8% returned to sport at an average of 9.8 months from their primary ACL surgery and 6.5 months following posterior capsular release surgery. No infections or neurovascular complications were observed. One patient required secondary release to achieve adequate extension. Conclusions For athletes with persistent knee extension loss after ACL reconstruction, knee extension was significantly improved at 2 years following arthroscopic posterior capsular release. Substantial improvements in patient‐reported outcomes also were seen. In addition, subjects demonstrated a high rate of return to sport and return to preinjury performance levels. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Procedural Trends in Medicare Reimbursement and Utilization for Breast Reconstruction
Thornburg, Danielle A. , Chow, Nathan , Haglin, Jack M. , Kruger, Erwin A., Rebecca, Alanna M. , Casey, William J., Teven, Chad M. , Chow, Nathan A, Haglin, Jack, Kruger, Erwin, Chow, Nathan A , Gupta, Nikita

Annals of Plastic Surgery | May 24, 2021 | Volume: 89 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 28-33

10.1097/sap.0000000000002830 Get It

Purpose Development of appropriate reimbursement models for breast reconstruction in the United States requires an understanding of relevant economic trends. The purpose of this study is to evaluate longitudinal patterns in Medicare reimbursement for frequently performed breast reconstruction procedures between 2000 and 2019. Methods Reimbursement data for 15 commonly performed breast reconstruction procedures were analyzed using the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool for each Current Procedural Terminology code. By utilizing changes to the US consumer price index, monetary data were adjusted for inflation to 2019 US dollars. Inflation-adjusted trends were used to calculate average annual and total percentage changes in reimbursement over time. Results From 2000 to 2019, average adjusted reimbursement for all procedures fell by 13.32%. All procedures demonstrated a negative adjusted reimbursement rate other than immediate insertion of breast prosthesis, which increased by 55.37%. The largest mean decrease was observed in breast reconstruction with other technique (−28.63%), followed by single pedicle transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (−26.02%), single pedicle transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap with microvascular anastomosis (−23.33%), latissimus dorsi flap (−19.65%), and free flap reconstruction (−19.36%). Conclusions There has been a steady yet substantial decline in Medicare reimbursement for the majority of breast reconstruction procedures over the last 20 years. Given increasing medical costs and the financial uncertainty of the US health care system, an understanding of Medicare reimbursement trends is vital for policymakers, administrators, and physicians to develop agreeable reimbursement models that facilitate growth and economic vitality of breast reconstruction in the United States.
An Analysis of Procedural Medicare Reimbursement Rates in Hand Surgery: 2000 to 2019
Thornburg, Danielle A. , Gupta, Nikita , Chow, Nathan , Haglin, Jack M. , Noland, Shelley S. , Haglin, Jack, Noland, Shelley, Chow, Nathan A

HAND | February 26, 2021 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1207-1213

10.1177/1558944721990807 Get It

Background: Medicare reimbursement trends across multiple surgical subspecialties have been analyzed; however, little has been reported regarding the long-term trends in reimbursement of hand surgery procedures. The aim of this study is to analyze trends in Medicare reimbursement for commonly performed hand surgeries. Methods: Using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File, we determined the 20 hand surgery procedure codes most commonly billed to Medicare in 2016. Reimbursement rates were collected and analyzed for each code from The Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool for years 2000 to 2019. We compared the change in reimbursement rate for each procedure to the rate of inflation in US dollars, using the Consumer Price Index (CPI) over the same time period. Results: The reimbursement rate for each procedure increased on average by 13.9% during the study period while the United States CPI increased significantly more by 46.7% ( P < .0001). When all reimbursement data were adjusted for inflation to 2019 dollars, the average reimbursement for all included procedures in this study decreased by 22.6% from 2000 to 2019. The average adjusted reimbursement rate for all procedures decreased by 21.92% from 2000 to 2009 and decreased by 0.86% on average from 2009 to 2019 ( P < .0001). Conclusion: When adjusted for inflation, Medicare reimbursement for hand surgery has steadily decreased over the past 20 years. It will be important to consider the implications of these trends when evaluating healthcare policies and the impact this has on access to hand surgery.