Harrison, Tabitha A

Abstract The completion of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project for colorectal cancer (CRC) has enabled a new, focused phase of sequencing tumor samples for which genome-wide genetic, epidemiological, clinical and lifestyle data have been collected. By combining somatic mutational profiles with these aforementioned data, we may identify and report effective prevention and treatment approaches for a broader population of individuals. The advent of targeted deep sequencing approaches using DNA obtained from formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissues has made possible the genetic characterization of the large numbers of patients needed to make such an effort relevant. As a first step, we describe a custom gene panel designed from large-scale studies for targeted deep sequencing, and its application to over 4,200 CR tumors, collected by the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO). This study is designed to identify recurrent somatic mutations and copy number alterations (CNAs) for association testing with germline genetic and lifestyle and environmental risk factors for CRC, and thereby identify relevant approaches to impact cancer prevention. The targeted CRC panel includes 205 genes. Genes were primarily selected as significantly mutated genes identified from the Nurses’ Health Study and Health Professional's Follow-up Study (n = 700), and TCGA (n = 525). We also included 15 genes associated with high penetrance germline mutations and augmented the list to include genes in pathways of somatically altered genes, identified by literature review, from public databases and known to be associated with loss of heterozygosity. For these 205 genes, amplification primers were designed to include all coding regions of transcripts that are listed in the UCSC Genome Browser. For regions with CNAs, the TCGA dataset was analyzed to include regions with greater than or equal to 2 copy focal gains or losses that were found in more than 4 or 3 tumors, respectively. Candidate genes in regions with significant CNAs from the TCGA CRC publication (Nature 2012) were also included. For CNAs, 6 to 12 amplicons were designed for each of the 56 selected regions (32 gains and 24 losses). Additional target regions include: 1) 25 microsatellite loci previously used to identify defective DNA mismatch repair and 212 homoploymer repeats. These include microsatellite loci recommended by the NCI Consensus Panel for identifying MSI; 2) amelogenin (for gender); and 3) Fusobacterium to detect a putative CRC-associated pathogen in tumor biopsies. At the AACR annual meeting, we expect to present results for deep sequencing (∼1,000X) of the first 1,000 CR tumors, including any preliminarily identified pathways and subtypes that may provide the basis for association testing with germline genetic and lifestyle and environmental risk factors needed for inferring better approaches to prevention and treatment of CRC. Citation Format: Syed H. Zaidi, Catie Grasso, Jasmine Mu, Eve Shinbrot, Marios Giannakis, Charles Connolly, Ivan Borozan, Hermann Brenner, Peter Campbell, Andrew Chan, Jenny Chang-Claude, Mengmeng Du, Vincent Ferretti, Amy French, Charles Fuchs, Steven Gallinger, Levi Garraway, Andrea Gsur, Marc Gunter, Tabitha Harrison, Michael Hoffmeister, Li Hsu, Wen-Yi Huang, Jeroen Huyghe, Mathieu Lemire, Elaine Mardis, John McPherson, Polly Newcomb, Lincoln Stein, Wei Sun, Lee Timms, Quang Trinh, David Wheeler, Christina Yung, Niha Zubair, Shuji Ogino, Stephen Thibodeau, Ulrike Peters, Thomas Hudson. Linking the molecular profile of colorectal tumors to germline genetic and environmental risk factors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 5221.

Abstract Background: High body mass index (BMI) is consistently linked to increased risk of colorectal cancer for men, whereas the association is less clear for women. As risk estimates from observational studies may be biased and/or confounded, we conducted a Mendelian randomization study to estimate the causal association between BMI and colorectal cancer. Methods: We used data from 10,226 colorectal cancer cases and 10,286 controls of European ancestry. The Mendelian randomization analysis used a weighted genetic risk score, derived from 77 genome-wide association study–identified variants associated with higher BMI, as an instrumental variable (IV). We compared the IV odds ratio (IV-OR) with the OR obtained using a conventional covariate-adjusted analysis. Results: Individuals carrying greater numbers of BMI-increasing alleles had higher colorectal cancer risk [per weighted allele OR, 1.31; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10–1.57]. Our IV estimation results support the hypothesis that genetically influenced BMI is directly associated with risk for colorectal cancer (IV-OR per 5 kg/m2, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.13–2.01). In the sex-specific IV analyses higher BMI was associated with higher risk of colorectal cancer among women (IV-OR per 5 kg/m2, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.26–2.61). For men, genetically influenced BMI was not associated with colorectal cancer (IV-OR per 5 kg/m2, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.73–1.92). Conclusions: High BMI was associated with increased colorectal cancer risk for women. Whether abdominal obesity, rather than overall obesity, is a more important risk factor for men requires further investigation. Impact: Overall, conventional epidemiologic and Mendelian randomization studies suggest a strong association between obesity and the risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(7); 1024–31. ©2015 AACR.

Abstract Background: Genetic and environmental factors influence colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Previous studies have provided additional etiologic insight by examining multiplicative gene-environment interactions for individual susceptibility loci. However, individual loci confer only modest risks, which may limit statistical power and clinical significance. A genetic risk score comprising known CRC loci may provide a more comprehensive assessment of risk. Further, there is a paucity of data on the role of additive gene-environment interactions, which may have greater public health implications than multiplicative interactions. We thus evaluated both additive and multiplicative interactions between a genetic risk score and 15 key environmental factors on risk of CRC. Methods: We conducted an analysis of 10,491 CRC cases and 10,725 controls of European ancestry in 7 cohort and 6 case-control studies participating in the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO) or Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR). To provide a global measure of genetic predisposition, information across multiple risk variants was combined by calculating a genetic risk score based on 24 polymorphisms near 21 genetic loci identified in previous genome-wide association studies. For the genetic score and environmental factors, the reference category corresponded to that associated with lower CRC risk. We tested for additive interactions by estimating relative excess risk due to interactions (RERIs) using logistic regression; for multiplicative interactions we used an empirical-Bayes approach. Nominal P values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: After adjustment for age, sex, center, study, principal components, and total energy, as appropriate, we observed super-additive gene-environment interactions for CRC risk between the genetic risk score and body mass index (RERI=0.15; 95% CI: 0.00-0.31), ever smoking (RERI=0.14; 95% CI: 0.00-0.28), pack-years of smoking (RERI=0.23; 95% CI: 0.05-0.41), postmenopausal hormone therapy use (RERI=0.38; 95% CI: 0.17-0.59), and intake of processed meat (RERI=0.23; 95% CI: 0.06-0.40). Of the 15 environmental risk factors, 12 showed RERIs > 0 – suggesting an overall trend toward super-additive interactions for these factors. In addition, we observed evidence of sub-multiplicative interactions for use of aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. There were no other statistically significant multiplicative interactions. Conclusions: We observed evidence for super-additive effects of genetic predisposition and environmental risk factors on risk of CRC. Our findings suggest that certain environmental risk factors have stronger effects on absolute risk among individuals with higher genetic risk of CRC. If confirmed in future studies, these results may have implications for targeted prevention strategies. Citation Format: Mengmeng Du, Sonja I. Berndt, Hermann Brenner, Bette J. Caan, Peter T. Campbell, Graham Casey, Andrew Chan, Jenny Chang-Claude, Stephen J. Chanock, Nilanjan Chatterjee, David V. Conti, David Duggan, Jane C. Figueiredo, Steven Gallinger, Jian Gong, Robert W. Haile, Tabitha A. Harrison, Richard B. Hayes, Michael Hoffmeister, John L. Hopper, Li Hsu, Thomas J. Hudson, Carolyn M. Hutter, Eric J. Jacobs, Mark A. Jenkins, Shuo Jiao, Laurence N. Kolonel, Peter Kraft, Loic Le Marchand, Mathieu Lemire, Yi Lin, Noralane M. Lindor, Polly A. Newcomb, John D. Potter, Robert E. Schoen, Fredrick R. Schumacher, Daniela Seminara, Martha L. Slattery, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Cornelia M. Ulrich, Aung Ko Win, Emily White, Brent W. Zanke, Ulrike Peters. Additive and multiplicative gene-environment interactions for colorectal cancer risk. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4831. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-4831

Objective Genome-wide association studies have identified a large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with a wide array of cancer sites. Several of these variants demonstrate associations with multiple cancers, suggesting pleiotropic effects and shared biological mechanisms across some cancers. We hypothesised that SNPs previously associated with other cancers may additionally be associated with colorectal cancer. In a large-scale study, we examined 171 SNPs previously associated with 18 different cancers for their associations with colorectal cancer. Design We examined 13 338 colorectal cancer cases and 40 967 controls from three consortia: Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE), Genetic Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer (GECCO), and the Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR). Study-specific logistic regression results, adjusted for age, sex, principal components of genetic ancestry, and/or study specific factors (as relevant) were combined using fixed-effect meta-analyses to evaluate the association between each SNP and colorectal cancer risk. A Bonferroni-corrected p value of 2.92×10 −4 was used to determine statistical significance of the associations. Results Two correlated SNPs—rs10090154 and rs4242382—in Region 1 of chromosome 8q24, a prostate cancer susceptibility region, demonstrated statistically significant associations with colorectal cancer risk. The most significant association was observed with rs4242382 (meta-analysis OR=1.12; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.18; p=1.74×10 −5 ), which also demonstrated similar associations across racial/ethnic populations and anatomical sub-sites. Conclusions This is the first study to clearly demonstrate Region 1 of chromosome 8q24 as a susceptibility locus for colorectal cancer; thus, adding colorectal cancer to the list of cancer sites linked to this particular multicancer risk region at 8q24.