Hawkes, M A

Background Resuming anticoagulation in patients with mechanical heart valves after intracranial hemorrhage presents a clinical dilemma. The optimal timing must balance the risk of thromboembolism against hemorrhagic expansion. Prior studies have addressed this issue, but most were limited by small sample sizes. This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to determine the optimal timing for anticoagulation resumption in this population. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus from database inception to August 23, 2024. The target population included adults with intracranial hemorrhage who required anticoagulation for mechanical heart valves. Results Thirteen studies involving 788 patients were included: 12 retrospective and 1 prospective observational study. While off anticoagulation, 32 patients developed ischemic stroke, with a pooled event rate of 5.23% (95% CI, 3.80–7.20%) and negligible heterogeneity ( I 2 = 0%). The pooled average time to stroke was 8.08 days (95% CI, 1.99–14.18). After anticoagulation resumption, 73 patients experienced hemorrhagic recurrence, corresponding to a pooled event rate of 10.95%, with nonsignificant heterogeneity ( I 2 = 40.4%). Conclusions Withholding anticoagulation for up to 7 days after intracranial hemorrhage in patients with mechanical heart valves appears relatively safe. Hemorrhagic recurrence after resumption was more common than ischemic stroke during interruption. However, the included studies were observational and carried serious or critical risk of bias. Prospective multicenter studies, and ideally randomized trials, are needed to provide more definitive evidence.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: External ventricular drain (EVD) placement is the most commonly performed bedside emergent neurosurgical procedure. However, catheter misplacement occurs in approximately 25% of cases, potentially resulting in neurological injury or the need for repositioning, highlighting the need for safer and more accurate placement techniques. This review aims to (1) summarize technological innovations developed to enhance the accuracy and safety of bedside EVD placement, (2) evaluate their reported benefits and limitations, and (3) identify key barriers to their clinical implementation in critical care settings. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus combining terms related to EVD placement and assistive technologies. All the studies evaluated EVD placement using simulations, phantoms, cadavers, and patient procedures conducted at the bedside and in the operating room. RESULTS: We identified 3898 records, and 76 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 30 studies compared stereotactic systems, ultrasound guidance, frameless neuronavigation, and augmented or mixed reality technologies to the freehand technique. These studies consistently reported improved accuracy with advanced systems although complication rates and procedural times were variably reported. An additional 35 and 12 studies evaluated nonimmersive and immersive technologies, respectively, in noncomparative settings. Most of these demonstrated high first-pass success and mean tip deviations under 3 mm. Variability in the definitions of accuracy and procedural metrics limited data synthesis, but the overall findings suggest a promising trajectory for technology-assisted EVD placement. CONCLUSION: Assistive technologies for EVD placement show potential to improve accuracy and safety over the freehand technique. These early successes signal potential to improve bedside neurosurgical care. Realizing this promise will require future studies to standardize accuracy metrics, report time, and safety outcomes consistently and validate performance in real-world critical care settings.

Background and purposeThe long‐term outcomes and stroke recurrence after basilar artery occlusion (BAO) are largely unknown. We aimed to assess these variables in a comparatively large series of consecutive patients.MethodsAdults with acute BAO were retrospectively identified from 1976 to 2011. Post‐discharge records were reviewed to assess for stroke recurrences, mortality and disability. Exploratory analysis of survival was carried out using Kaplan–Meier and log‐rank tests. Factors associated with survival time were determined using Cox models.ResultsA total of 86 patients (34% female, median age 72 [interquartile range (IQR), 60–79] years) with a median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 11 (IQR, 6–27) were included. Twenty‐nine patients (34%) died during the initial hospitalization. Median modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge among survivors was 4 (IQR, 2.5–5.5). At 1 and 5 years, 70% of survivors ad a mRS ≤3. Seventeen patients had recurrent strokes during the hospitalization and 12 patients had 19 recurrent strokes after discharge. The median survival time was 52 days (IQR, 6–1846). Older age per decade on admission [adjusted hazard ratios (aHR), 1.32; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05–1.66, P = 0.02] and a higher mRS at discharge (aHR, 4.48; 95% CI, 2.72–7.39, P < 0.0001) were associated with mortality. Patients who were not treated with any reperfusion therapy had a trend towards reduced mortality (aHR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.14–1.08, P = 0.07).ConclusionsSurvivors from BAO had severe short‐term functional disability. Most deaths and stroke recurrences occurred within the first year following the initial event. The risk of death was higher in older and more disabled survivors. However, favorable long‐term recovery was possible.