Biernacka, Joanna

ABSTRACT Objectives To investigate pharmacological treatment patterns in individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) with and without comorbid substance use disorder (SUD) and anxiety disorder (AX), we leveraged the Global Bipolar Cohort to analyze cross‐regional practices across North America, Europe, and the Pacific. Methods Fourteen cohorts contributed aggregate data on pharmacotherapy, demographics, diagnostic subtypes, and comorbidities. Proportional meta‐analyses using generalized linear mixed models were conducted to examine prescription trends and identify clinical differences. Results The sample ( N = 11,521) was 60% female and 84% Caucasian. Participants were categorized into four mutually exclusive groups based on comorbidity status: those with comorbid AX only, comorbid SUD only, both AX and SUD, or neither. The AX+SUD subgroup showed higher rates of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), rapid cycling, obesity, and unemployment, reflecting a more severe clinical profile. Regional variations were notable: North American cohorts reported higher prevalence of AX and SUD than European and Pacific cohorts. Antidepressants use for AX were more common in Europe and the Pacific, while North American prescribing patterns were more variable. Benzodiazepine use was high among individuals with SUD across all regions. Lithium and first‐generation antipsychotic prescriptions varied, with higher rates observed in Europe. Conclusions Findings underscore the heterogeneity of BD and the influence of comorbid AX and SUD on illness burden and treatment. Regional prescribing variations underscore the need for context‐specific guidelines. Gaps in data on medication‐assisted treatment for SUD point to areas for future research. These insights can support more individualized and effective care for complex BD presentations.

ABSTRACT Background This study aimed to explore the effect of family history (FH) and polygenic risk scores (PRS) for multiple psychiatric disorders on lithium response in bipolar disorder (BD). Method The sample included patients from the Mayo Clinic BD Biobank. FH in first‐degree relatives was obtained via the patient questionnaire. Linear regression models tested the association of FH and PRS for BD, major depressive disorder (MDD), schizophrenia (SCZ), alcohol use disorder (AUD), anxiety disorder (ANX), and attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with lithium response measured by the Alda A score adjusted for the Alda B sum score. Post hoc models additionally adjusted for clinical covariates (age at onset, rapid cycling, and BD subtype). Results 716 patients had Alda scores for lithium response (61.9% females, mean age = 43.4 years). FH‐BD ( β = −0.57, p = 0.015), AUD ( β = −0.44, p = 0.045), and ANX ( β = −0.61, p = 0.050) were associated with worse lithium response. After adjusting for clinical covariates, associations for FH‐BD and FH‐ANX were no longer significant. PRS‐BD was associated with better response ( β = 0.22, p = 0.041), while PRS‐MDD ( β = −0.28, p = 0.01) and PRS‐ADHD ( β = −0.24, p = 0.028) were associated with worse response, with effects largely unchanged after adjusting for clinical covariates. In the combined model considering all FHs simultaneously, only FH‐BD remained significantly associated with worse lithium response ( β = −0.71, p = 0.039). In the combined model for PRS, only PRS‐BD ( β = 0.31, p = 0.008; better response) and PRS‐MDD ( β = −0.29, p = 0.020; worse response) showed significant associations. Conclusions In this exploratory study, FH‐BD, AUD, and ANX were associated with poor response, though only FH‐AUD remained significant after adjusting for clinical factors. PRS‐BD predicted better response, while PRS‐MDD was associated with worse response. These findings suggest independent and potentially complementary roles of FH and PRS. Integrating both familial and genetic risk measures may improve personalized treatment strategies and outcomes for BD patients.

ABSTRACT Background Mood episodes in bipolar disorder (BD) follow a seasonal pattern in approximately 25% of patients. We aimed to examine the associations of specific seasonality patterns in BD with various clinical phenotypes and treatment‐related outcomes. Methods Patients from the Mayo Clinic Bipolar Disorder Biobank with available seasonality data were included in the study. Among those reporting any seasonality, participants were further categorized into four seasonality groups: fall/winter depression, spring/summer (hypo)mania, biphasic (fall/winter depression with spring/summer (hypo)mania), and equinoctial seasonality (any mood episode occurring in spring or fall). Regression models were used, treating seasonality patterns as the predictor of clinical phenotypes (BD subtype, early onset, history of psychosis, suicide attempt, rapid cycling), lifetime medication exposure (number of unique antidepressants, antipsychotics, and any psychotropics) and treatment response to mood stabilizers (Alda A score). Results Among 1702 patients with BD (61.5% female, mean age = 41.43 ± 14.73 years), 44.6% reported seasonal mood episodes. Individuals with any seasonality were more likely to have BD‐I (OR = 1.29, p = 0.024), early onset (OR = 1.29, p = 0.026), exposure to higher lifetime number of antipsychotics (IRR = 1.20, p < 0.001) and any psychotropics (IRR = 1.13, p < 0.001). Fall/winter depression was associated with a higher lifetime number of antidepressants (IRR = 1.18, p = 0.021), any psychotropics (IRR = 1.14, p = 0.013), worse response to lithium ( β = −0.82, p = 0.029) and all mood stabilizers ( β = −0.69, p = 0.014). Spring/summer (hypo)mania showed negative associations with rapid cycling (OR = 0.36, p < 0.001) and lifetime number of antidepressants (IRR = 0.70, p = 0.013). Equinoctial seasonality was linked to a history of psychosis (OR = 1.76, p = 0.004). Conclusion Seasonality in BD is associated with distinct clinical features and treatment‐related outcomes. Specific seasonality patterns, particularly fall/winter depression, may reflect a more complex and difficult‐to‐treat illness course. These findings highlight the need for research to better characterize seasonality subtypes beyond a binary “seasonal” vs. “non‐seasonal” classification and to explore how these patterns influence the illness course and management of BD.

ABSTRACT Objectives To explore the clinical impact of social determinants of health (SDoH) stress in bipolar disorder (BD) course of illness and to explore potential gender differences in SDoH stress endorsement. Methods 2280 individuals living with BD type I or II (62% women; 67.5% BD‐I) participating in the Mayo Clinic Bipolar Biobank who completed a questionnaire assessing positive and negative‐valent stressors in the 12 months prior to study enrollment were included for this analysis. Six negative stressors were used as proxies of SDoH. Generalized linear models were used to test the association between SDoH stressors and markers of illness severity as well as potential differences by sex by including an interaction term. Results After adjusting for age, sex, and recruitment site, SDoH‐related stressors were significantly associated with a more severe course of illness in both men and women. Except for unemployment rates, women reported more frequently SDoH‐related stress (i.e., lack of family support, financial problems, health coverage and access problems). Conclusions The study found significant gender differences in both the endorsement of specific SDoH stressors and in the prevalence of specific illness severity markers; however, it did not directly test the predictive relationship between gender differences in SDoH and illness severity markers. Future studies aiming to achieve health equity in mental health care should continue assessing social determinants of health stressors, incorporating a gender perspective to better understand their influence on bipolar disorder.

Abstract Background: Pharmacogenomic studies on antidepressant treatment outcomes could be conducted using previously collected data from electronic health record (EHR)-linked biobanks. However, absence of EHR based outcome measures is an unmet need in designing such studies We aimed to define EHR-derived antidepressant outcome measures and explore their utility in showing associations between treatment outcomes and Cytochrome P450 (CYP) metabolizer phenotypes in a proof-of-concept study. Methods: Using data from the EHR-linked cohort, Right Drug, Right Dose, Right Time: Using Genomic Data to Individualize Treatment (RIGHT 10K) Study, we collected prescription data and patient health questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) scores to compute 3 proxy measures for antidepressant response, efficacy, and acceptability: change in PHQ-9 scores, longest treatment interval with a single antidepressant, and antidepressant non-refill. Subsequently, we tested the association of both prescription-based outcomes with DNA-predicted CYP metabolizer phenotypes in European-ancestry participants. Results: We identified 3920 RIGHT 10K participants with at least 1 antidepressant prescription and European-ancestry. Participants had a mean age of 61 years and 72% were women. Implementation of the PHQ-9 outcome was not feasible because of missingness. Of both prescription-based outcomes, antidepressant non-refill reproduced several known antidepressant-CYP interactions. However, the pilot was limited by small subgroups of participants with non-normal metabolizer phenotypes. Conclusions: Derived from structured data, antidepressant non-refill is a promising outcome measure for EHR-linked biobanks that partially reproduced antidepressant-CYP interactions. However, testing on larger datasets is necessary to understand whether it would be a useful for pharmacogenomic research.

ABSTRACTBackgroundInsomnia and substance use disorders (SUD) are common comorbidities of bipolar disorder (BD). Genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) have uncovered shared genetic contributions to insomnia and BD as well as SUDs and BD. Electronic health record (EHR) derived phenotypes (phecodes) and questionnaire data were used to examine the relationship between insomnia genetic liability and SUDs in BD.Methods40,839 participants from the Mayo Clinic Bipolar Disorder Biobank (BD Biobank; n = 774) and Mayo Clinic Biobank (n = 485 BD cases, n = 39,580 controls) were included in the analyses of diagnosis (phecode) outcomes (insomnia, SUD, alcohol use disorder [AUD] and tobacco use disorder [TUD]). Analyses of specific SUD outcomes obtained through the BD Biobank questionnaire included 1789 cases and considered BD subtype. Logistic regression was used to test for associations between insomnia polygenic risk scores (PRS) and insomnia and SUD outcomes in BD cases and controls.ResultsInsomnia PRS was associated with having an insomnia diagnosis (phecode) in the EHR in controls (OR = 1.19, p = 9.64e‐33) but not in BD cases (OR = 1, p = 0.95). Associations between insomnia PRS and SUD diagnoses were significant in BD cases and controls, with the association being stronger in BD cases (interaction p = 0.024). In the BD Biobank data, the insomnia PRS was associated with increased odds of AUD (OR = 1.19, p = 4.26e‐04), TUD (OR = 1.21, p = 1.25e‐05) and cannabis use disorder (OR = 1.16, p = 4.19e‐03).ConclusionThe effect of genetic predisposition to insomnia on SUD risk may be stronger in BD cases than in controls, which could have clinical care implications for individuals with BD and comorbid SUD.

Abstract Lithium is the gold standard treatment for bipolar disorder (BD). However, its mechanism of action is incompletely understood, and prediction of treatment outcomes is limited. In our previous multi-omics study of the Pharmacogenomics of Bipolar Disorder (PGBD) sample combining transcriptomic and genomic data, we found that focal adhesion, the extracellular matrix (ECM), and PI3K-Akt signaling networks were associated with response to lithium. In this study, we replicated the results of our previous study using network propagation methods in a genome-wide association study of an independent sample of 2,039 patients from the International Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen) study. We identified functional enrichment in focal adhesion and PI3K-Akt pathways, but we did not find an association with the ECM pathway. Our results suggest that deficits in the neuronal growth cone and PI3K-Akt signaling, but not in ECM proteins, may influence response to lithium in BD.

Abstract Objectives To understand treatment practices for bipolar disorders (BD), this study leveraged the Global Bipolar Cohort collaborative network to investigate pharmacotherapeutic treatment patterns in multiple cohorts of well‐characterized individuals with BD in North America, Europe, and Australia. Methods Data on pharmacotherapy, demographics, diagnostic subtypes, and comorbidities were provided from each participating cohort. Individual site and regional pooled proportional meta‐analyses with generalized linear mixed methods were conducted to identify prescription patterns. Results This study included 10,351 individuals from North America ( n = 3985), Europe ( n = 3822), and Australia ( n = 2544). Overall, participants were predominantly female (60%) with BD‐I (60%; vs. BD‐II = 33%). Cross‐sectionally, mood‐stabilizing anticonvulsants (44%), second‐generation antipsychotics (42%), and antidepressants (38%) were the most prescribed medications. Lithium was prescribed in 29% of patients, primarily in the Australian (31%) and European (36%) cohorts. First‐generation antipsychotics were prescribed in 24% of the European versus 1% in the North American cohort. Antidepressant prescription rates were higher in BD‐II (47%) compared to BD‐I (35%). Major limitations were significant differences among cohorts based on inclusion/exclusion criteria, data source, and time/year of enrollment into cohort. Conclusions Mood‐stabilizing anticonvulsants, second‐generation antipsychotics, and antidepressants were the most prescribed medications suggesting prescription patterns that are not necessarily guideline concordant. Significant differences exist in the prescription practices across different geographic regions, especially the underutilization of lithium in the North American cohorts and the higher utilization of first‐generation antipsychotics in the European cohorts. There is a need to conduct future longitudinal studies to further explore these differences and their impact on outcomes, and to inform and implement evidence‐based guidelines to help improve treatment practices in BD.

Abstract The link between bipolar disorder (BP) and immune dysfunction remains controversial. While epidemiological studies have long suggested an association, recent research has found only limited evidence of such a relationship. To clarify this, we investigated the contributions of immune-relevant genetic factors to the response to lithium (Li) treatment and the clinical presentation of BP. First, we assessed the association of a large collection of immune-related genes (4,925) with Li response, defined by the Retrospective Assessment of the Lithium Response Phenotype Scale (Alda scale), and clinical characteristics in patients with BP from the International Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLi+Gen, N = 2,374). Second, we calculated here previously published polygenic scores (PGSs) for immune-related traits and evaluated their associations with Li response and clinical features. We found several genes associated with Li response at p < 1x10− 4 values, including HAS3, CNTNAP5 and NFIB. Network and functional enrichment analyses uncovered an overrepresentation of pathways involved in cell adhesion and intercellular communication, which appear to converge on the well-known Li-induced inhibition of GSK-3β. We also found various genes associated with BP’s age-at-onset, number of mood episodes, and presence of psychosis, substance abuse and/or suicidal ideation at the exploratory threshold. These included RTN4, XKR4, NRXN1, NRG1/3 and GRK5. Additionally, PGS analyses suggested serum FAS, ECP, TRANCE and cytokine ligands, amongst others, might represent potential circulating biomarkers of Li response and clinical presentation. Taken together, our results support the notion of a relatively weak association between immunity and clinically relevant features of BP at the genetic level.