Sánchez-Ruiz, Jorge A.

ABSTRACT Objectives To explore the clinical impact of social determinants of health (SDoH) stress in bipolar disorder (BD) course of illness and to explore potential gender differences in SDoH stress endorsement. Methods 2280 individuals living with BD type I or II (62% women; 67.5% BD‐I) participating in the Mayo Clinic Bipolar Biobank who completed a questionnaire assessing positive and negative‐valent stressors in the 12 months prior to study enrollment were included for this analysis. Six negative stressors were used as proxies of SDoH. Generalized linear models were used to test the association between SDoH stressors and markers of illness severity as well as potential differences by sex by including an interaction term. Results After adjusting for age, sex, and recruitment site, SDoH‐related stressors were significantly associated with a more severe course of illness in both men and women. Except for unemployment rates, women reported more frequently SDoH‐related stress (i.e., lack of family support, financial problems, health coverage and access problems). Conclusions The study found significant gender differences in both the endorsement of specific SDoH stressors and in the prevalence of specific illness severity markers; however, it did not directly test the predictive relationship between gender differences in SDoH and illness severity markers. Future studies aiming to achieve health equity in mental health care should continue assessing social determinants of health stressors, incorporating a gender perspective to better understand their influence on bipolar disorder.

Abstract Background: Pharmacogenomic studies on antidepressant treatment outcomes could be conducted using previously collected data from electronic health record (EHR)-linked biobanks. However, absence of EHR based outcome measures is an unmet need in designing such studies We aimed to define EHR-derived antidepressant outcome measures and explore their utility in showing associations between treatment outcomes and Cytochrome P450 (CYP) metabolizer phenotypes in a proof-of-concept study. Methods: Using data from the EHR-linked cohort, Right Drug, Right Dose, Right Time: Using Genomic Data to Individualize Treatment (RIGHT 10K) Study, we collected prescription data and patient health questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) scores to compute 3 proxy measures for antidepressant response, efficacy, and acceptability: change in PHQ-9 scores, longest treatment interval with a single antidepressant, and antidepressant non-refill. Subsequently, we tested the association of both prescription-based outcomes with DNA-predicted CYP metabolizer phenotypes in European-ancestry participants. Results: We identified 3920 RIGHT 10K participants with at least 1 antidepressant prescription and European-ancestry. Participants had a mean age of 61 years and 72% were women. Implementation of the PHQ-9 outcome was not feasible because of missingness. Of both prescription-based outcomes, antidepressant non-refill reproduced several known antidepressant-CYP interactions. However, the pilot was limited by small subgroups of participants with non-normal metabolizer phenotypes. Conclusions: Derived from structured data, antidepressant non-refill is a promising outcome measure for EHR-linked biobanks that partially reproduced antidepressant-CYP interactions. However, testing on larger datasets is necessary to understand whether it would be a useful for pharmacogenomic research.

ABSTRACTBackgroundInsomnia and substance use disorders (SUD) are common comorbidities of bipolar disorder (BD). Genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) have uncovered shared genetic contributions to insomnia and BD as well as SUDs and BD. Electronic health record (EHR) derived phenotypes (phecodes) and questionnaire data were used to examine the relationship between insomnia genetic liability and SUDs in BD.Methods40,839 participants from the Mayo Clinic Bipolar Disorder Biobank (BD Biobank; n = 774) and Mayo Clinic Biobank (n = 485 BD cases, n = 39,580 controls) were included in the analyses of diagnosis (phecode) outcomes (insomnia, SUD, alcohol use disorder [AUD] and tobacco use disorder [TUD]). Analyses of specific SUD outcomes obtained through the BD Biobank questionnaire included 1789 cases and considered BD subtype. Logistic regression was used to test for associations between insomnia polygenic risk scores (PRS) and insomnia and SUD outcomes in BD cases and controls.ResultsInsomnia PRS was associated with having an insomnia diagnosis (phecode) in the EHR in controls (OR = 1.19, p = 9.64e‐33) but not in BD cases (OR = 1, p = 0.95). Associations between insomnia PRS and SUD diagnoses were significant in BD cases and controls, with the association being stronger in BD cases (interaction p = 0.024). In the BD Biobank data, the insomnia PRS was associated with increased odds of AUD (OR = 1.19, p = 4.26e‐04), TUD (OR = 1.21, p = 1.25e‐05) and cannabis use disorder (OR = 1.16, p = 4.19e‐03).ConclusionThe effect of genetic predisposition to insomnia on SUD risk may be stronger in BD cases than in controls, which could have clinical care implications for individuals with BD and comorbid SUD.

Abstract Objectives Social support (SS) and social isolation (SI) are social determinants of health (SDOH) associated with psychiatric outcomes. In electronic health records (EHRs), individual-level SS/SI is typically documented in narrative clinical notes rather than as structured coded data. Natural language processing (NLP) algorithms can automate the otherwise labor-intensive process of extraction of such information. Materials and Methods Psychiatric encounter notes from Mount Sinai Health System (MSHS, n = 300) and Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM, n = 225) were annotated to create a gold-standard corpus. A rule-based system (RBS) involving lexicons and a large language model (LLM) using FLAN-T5-XL were developed to identify mentions of SS and SI and their subcategories (eg, social network, instrumental support, and loneliness). Results For extracting SS/SI, the RBS obtained higher macroaveraged F1-scores than the LLM at both MSHS (0.89 versus 0.65) and WCM (0.85 versus 0.82). For extracting the subcategories, the RBS also outperformed the LLM at both MSHS (0.90 versus 0.62) and WCM (0.82 versus 0.81). Discussion and Conclusion Unexpectedly, the RBS outperformed the LLMs across all metrics. An intensive review demonstrates that this finding is due to the divergent approach taken by the RBS and LLM. The RBS was designed and refined to follow the same specific rules as the gold-standard annotations. Conversely, the LLM was more inclusive with categorization and conformed to common English-language understanding. Both approaches offer advantages, although additional replication studies are warranted.

Background: Antidepressants are among the most prescribed medications in the United States. The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence of antidepressant prescriptions and investigate sex differences and age-sex interactions in adults enrolled in the Right Drug, Right Dose, Right Time: Using Genomic Data to Individualize Treatment (RIGHT) study. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the RIGHT study. Using electronic prescriptions, we assessed 12-month prevalence of antidepressant treatment. Sex differences and age-sex interactions were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and flexible recursive smoothing splines. Results: The sample consisted of 11,087 participants (60% women). Antidepressant prescription prevalence was 22.24% (27.96% women, 13.58% men). After adjusting for age and enrollment year, women had significantly greater odds of antidepressant prescription (odds ratio = 2.29; 95% confidence interval = 2.07, 2.54). Furthermore, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) had a significant age-sex interaction. While SSRI prescriptions in men showed a sustained decrease with age, there was no such decline for women until after reaching ∼50 years of age. There are important limitations to consider in this study. Electronic prescription data were cross-sectional; information on treatment duration or adherence was not collected; this cohort is not nationally representative; and enrollment occurred over a broad period, introducing confounding by changes in temporal prescribing practices. Conclusions: Underscored by the significant interaction between age and sex on odds of SSRI prescription, our results warrant age to be incorporated as a mediator when investigating sex differences in mental illness, especially mood disorders and their treatment.

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to review the association between the SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and antidepressant (AD)-associated treatment emergent mania (TEM) in bipolar disorder alongside starting a discussion on the merits of developing risk stratification models to guide when not to provide AD treatment for bipolar depression. Methods Studies that examined the association between clinical and genetic risk factors, specifically monoaminergic transporter genetic variation, and TEM were identified. A meta-analysis was performed using the odds ratio to estimate the effect size under the Der-Simonian and Laird model. Results Seven studies, referencing the SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and TEM (total N = 1578; TEM+ =594, TEM− = 984), of 142 identified articles were included. The time duration between the start of the AD to emergence of TEM ranged from 4 to 12 weeks. There was a nominally significant association between the s allele of the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and TEM (odds ratio, 1.434; 95% confidence interval, 1.001–2.055; P = 0.0493; I 2 = 52%). No studies have investigated norepinephrine or dopamine transporters. Conclusion Although the serotonin transporter genetic variation is commercially available in pharmacogenomic decision support tools, greater efforts, more broadly, should focus on complete genome-wide approaches to determine genetic variants that may contribute to TEM. Moreover, these data are exemplary to the merits of developing risk stratification models, which include both clinical and biological risk factors, to guide when not to use ADs in bipolar disorder. Future studies will need to validate new risk models that best inform the development of personalized medicine best practices treating bipolar depression.

Abstract There is increasing interest in individualizing treatment selection for more than 25 regulatory approved treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD). Despite an inconclusive efficacy evidence base, antidepressants (ADs) are prescribed for the depressive phase of bipolar disorder with oftentimes an inadequate treatment response and or clinical concern for mood destabilization. This study explored the relationship between antidepressant response in MDD and antidepressant-associated treatment emergent mania (TEM) in bipolar disorder (BD). We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) and polygenic score analysis of TEM and tested its association with a subset of BD-I patients treated with SSRIs or SNRIs. Our results did not identify any genome-wide significant variants although, we found that a higher polygenic score (PGS) for antidepressant response in MDD was associated with higher odds of TEM in BD. Future studies with larger transdiagnostic cohorts treated with antidepressants are encouraged to identify a neurobiological mechanism associated with a spectrum of depression improvement (response- emergent mania).