Back to Authors

Zhang, Yiye

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3494-2699

Mayo Clinic

Weill Cornell Medicine

Citations 2

Extracting social support and social isolation information from clinical psychiatry notes: comparing a rule-based natural language processing system and a large language model
Patra, Braja Gopal , Lepow, Lauren , Kumar, Praneet Kasi Reddy Jagadeesh, Vekaria, Veer , Sharma, Mohit , Adekkanattu, Prakash , Fennessy, Brian , Hynes, Gavin, Landi, Isotta , Sánchez-Ruiz, Jorge A. , Ryu, Euijung , Nadkarni, Girish N. , Talati, Ardesheer , Zhang, Yiye , Charney, Alexander W. , Pathak, Jyotishman , Lepow, Lauren A , Sharma, Mohit M , Pathak, Jyotishman , Vekaria, Veer , Patra, Braja G , Sanchez-Ruiz, Jorge A , Biernacka, Joanna M. , Weissman, Myrna M. , Olfson, Mark , Mann, J. John

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association | October 18, 2024 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 218-226

10.1093/jamia/ocae260 Get It

Abstract Objectives Social support (SS) and social isolation (SI) are social determinants of health (SDOH) associated with psychiatric outcomes. In electronic health records (EHRs), individual-level SS/SI is typically documented in narrative clinical notes rather than as structured coded data. Natural language processing (NLP) algorithms can automate the otherwise labor-intensive process of extraction of such information. Materials and Methods Psychiatric encounter notes from Mount Sinai Health System (MSHS, n = 300) and Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM, n = 225) were annotated to create a gold-standard corpus. A rule-based system (RBS) involving lexicons and a large language model (LLM) using FLAN-T5-XL were developed to identify mentions of SS and SI and their subcategories (eg, social network, instrumental support, and loneliness). Results For extracting SS/SI, the RBS obtained higher macroaveraged F1-scores than the LLM at both MSHS (0.89 versus 0.65) and WCM (0.85 versus 0.82). For extracting the subcategories, the RBS also outperformed the LLM at both MSHS (0.90 versus 0.62) and WCM (0.82 versus 0.81). Discussion and Conclusion Unexpectedly, the RBS outperformed the LLMs across all metrics. An intensive review demonstrates that this finding is due to the divergent approach taken by the RBS and LLM. The RBS was designed and refined to follow the same specific rules as the gold-standard annotations. Conversely, the LLM was more inclusive with categorization and conformed to common English-language understanding. Both approaches offer advantages, although additional replication studies are warranted.
Data‐driven discovery of probable Alzheimer's disease and related dementia subphenotypes using electronic health records
Xu, Jie , Xu, Zhenxing , Adekkanattu, Prakash , Brandt, Pascal , Jiang, Guoqian , Kiefer, Richard C. , Luo, Yuan , Mao, Chengsheng , Zhang, Yiye , Isaacson, Richard , Pathak, Jyotishman , Brandt, Pascal S , Xu, Jie , Luo, Yuan , Wang, Fei “Fred” , Pacheco, Jennifer A. , Rasmussen, Luke V.

Learning Health Systems | September 24, 2020 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/lrh2.10246 Get It

AbstractIntroductionWe sought to assess longitudinal electronic health records (EHRs) using machine learning (ML) methods to computationally derive probable Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and related dementia subphenotypes.MethodsA retrospective analysis of EHR data from a cohort of 7587 patients seen at a large, multi‐specialty urban academic medical center in New York was conducted. Subphenotypes were derived using hierarchical clustering from 792 probable AD patients (cases) who had received at least one diagnosis of AD using their clinical data. The other 6795 patients, labeled as controls, were matched on age and gender with the cases and randomly selected in the ratio of 9:1. Prediction models with multiple ML algorithms were trained on this cohort using 5‐fold cross‐validation. XGBoost was used to rank the variable importance.ResultsFour subphenotypes were computationally derived. Subphenotype A (n = 273; 28.2%) had more patients with cardiovascular diseases; subphenotype B (n = 221; 27.9%) had more patients with mental health illnesses, such as depression and anxiety; patients in subphenotype C (n = 183; 23.1%) were overall older (mean (SD) age, 79.5 (5.4) years) and had the most comorbidities including diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and mental health disorders; and subphenotype D (n = 115; 14.5%) included patients who took anti‐dementia drugs and had sensory problems, such as deafness and hearing impairment.The 0‐year prediction model for AD risk achieved an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.764 (SD: 0.02); the 6‐month model, 0.751 (SD: 0.02); the 1‐year model, 0.752 (SD: 0.02); the 2‐year model, 0.749 (SD: 0.03); and the 3‐year model, 0.735 (SD: 0.03), respectively. Based on variable importance, the top‐ranked comorbidities included depression, stroke/transient ischemic attack, hypertension, anxiety, mobility impairments, and atrial fibrillation. The top‐ranked medications included anti‐dementia drugs, antipsychotics, antiepileptics, and antidepressants.ConclusionsFour subphenotypes were computationally derived that correlated with cardiovascular diseases and mental health illnesses. ML algorithms based on patient demographics, diagnosis, and treatment demonstrated promising results in predicting the risk of developing AD at different time points across an individual's lifespan.