Back to Authors

Collins, Jeremy

Mayo Clinic

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Citations 2

Multicenter Study on the Diagnostic Performance of Native-T1 Cardiac Magnetic Resonance of Chronic Myocardial Infarctions at 3T
Wang, Guan , Yang, Qi , Sadras, Vignesh , Patel, Suraj , Yang, Hsin‐Jung , Sharif, Behzad , Kali, Avinash , Cokic, Ivan, Xie, Guoxi , Tighiouart, Mourad , Li, Debiao , Berman, Daniel S. , Chang, Hyuk‐Jae , Collins, Jeremy, Chang, Hyuk-Jae , Li, Debiao , Lee, Sang‐Eun , Collins, Jeremy D. , Dharmakumar, Rohan

Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging | June 8, 2020 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circimaging.119.009894 Get It

Background: Preclinical studies and pilot patient studies have shown that chronic infarctions can be detected and characterized from cardiac magnetic resonance without gadolinium-based contrast agents using native-T1 maps at 3T. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic capacity of this approach for characterizing chronic myocardial infarctions (MIs) in a multi-center setting. Methods: Patients with a prior MI (n=105) were recruited at 3 different medical centers and were imaged with native-T1 mapping and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) at 3T. Infarct location, size, and transmurality were determined from native-T1 maps and LGE. Sensitivity, specificity, receiver-operating characteristic metrics, and inter- and intraobserver variabilities were assessed relative to LGE. Results: Across all subjects, T1 of MI territory was 1621±110 ms, and remote territory was 1225±75 ms. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve for detecting MI location based on native-T1 mapping relative to LGE were 88%, 92%, and 0.93, respectively. Native-T1 maps were not different for measuring infarct size (native-T1 maps: 12.1±7.5%; LGE: 11.8±7.2%, P =0.82) and were in agreement with LGE ( R 2 =0.92, bias, 0.09±2.6%). Corresponding inter- and intraobserver assessments were also highly correlated (interobserver: R 2 =0.90, bias, 0.18±2.4%; and intraobserver: R 2 =0.91, bias, 0.28±2.1%). Native T1 maps were not different for measuring MI transmurality (native-T1 maps: 49.1±15.8%; LGE: 47.2±19.0%, P =0.56) and showed agreement ( R 2 =0.71; bias, 1.32±10.2%). Corresponding inter- and intraobserver assessments were also in agreement (interobserver: R 2 =0.81, bias, 0.1±9.4%; and intraobserver: R 2 =0.91, bias, 0.28±2.1%, respectively). While the overall accuracy for detecting MI with native-T1 maps at 3T was high, logistic regression analysis showed that MI location was a prominent confounder. Conclusions: Native-T1 mapping can be used to image chronic MI with high degree of accuracy, and as such, it is a viable alternative for scar imaging in patients with chronic MI who are contraindicated for LGE. Technical advancements may be needed to overcome the imaging confounders that currently limit native-T1 mapping from reaching equivalent detection levels as LGE.
Gluteal Vein Anatomy: Location, Caliber, Impact of Patient Positioning, and Implications for Fat Grafting
Turin, Sergey Y. , Fracol, Megan , Keller, Eric J. , Markl, Michael , Krochmal, Daniel J., Kim, John Y. S. , Collins, Jeremy, Markl, Michael , Collins, Jeremy D.

Aesthetic Surgery Journal | October 1, 2019 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 642-649

10.1093/asj/sjz260 Get It

Abstract Background Deaths in gluteal autografting occur due to gluteal vein injuries, but data are lacking on the precise location and caliber of these veins. Objectives The authors sought to present the first in vivo study of gluteal vein anatomy utilizing magnetic resonance imaging. Methods Magnetic resonance imaging venography of 16 volunteer hemi-sections was conducted in the supine, prone, prone with a bump (jack-knife), and left and right decubitus positions in 1 session after a single contrast administration. Caliber and course of the superior and inferior gluteal veins (SGV/IGV) were analyzed vs bony landmarks and position changes. Results The SGV has a very short submuscular course before splitting into 2 smaller branches superolaterally. The IGV runs immediately deep to the gluteus maximus in the center of the buttock as a single large trunk, on average 56 mm deep (mean 27 mm of muscle belly and 30 mm subcutaneous fat). No intramuscular or subcutaneous branches greater than 2 mm were found. In the prone position, the IGV and SGV have an average caliber of 5.96 mm and 5.63 mm. Vessel caliber decreased by 21% and 27%, respectively, in the jack-knife position and by 14% and 15% in lateral decubitus. Conclusions The SGV and IGV are immediately deep to gluteus maximus approximately 6 cm deep with a caliber on the order of 6 mm in the prone position. The distribution of these vessels suggests there is no “safe zone” in the intramuscular or submuscular planes. The jackknife or lateral decubitus positions can decrease vein caliber by up to 27%, possibly reducing the risk of injury due to either traction or direct cannula impact.