Majithia, Vikas

Purpose: The prevalence and phenotype of capillaroscopic abnormalities in patients with autonomic nervous system dysfunction have not yet been investigated. Multiorgan involvement in dysautonomia entails abnormal vasoreactivity. We aim to correlate the diagnosis of autonomic dysfunction with certain clinical manifestations, which may provide prognostic or diagnostic information using a noninvasive technique, i.e., nailfold video capillaroscopy (NVC). Methods: Patients with autonomic nervous system dysfunction were recruited from rheumatology and neurology clinics with voluntary NVC procedures from 31 January 2024 to 10 January 2024, and a comparison with normal controls was performed. Additional recorded information include demographics and diagnoses of autonomic dysfunction types by autonomic testing, including, but not limited to, the following: reflex screen, sweat test, Valsalva maneuver, nerve fiber density, electromyography (EMG), serology, and history of autoimmune diseases. NVC was performed on a total of 27 patients. This study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board. Results: The autonomic dysfunction group consisted of small-fiber neuropathy (37%), orthostatic hypotension (48%), autonomic neuropathy (30%), limited autonomic neuropathy (7%), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) (7%), and connective tissue disease (7%), among other types. Patients with autonomic dysfunction had statistically significant increases in microhemorrhages, dilated capillaries, and ramifications when compared to controls. Conclusions: Autonomic dysfunction was associated with statistically significant microvascular abnormalities compared to normal controls with a distinct NVC pattern. There was a statistically significant correlation between age and BMI with microvascular abnormalities. Here, we demonstrate the diagnostic potential of NVC in autonomic dysfunction and advocate for further study of capillary structures in autonomic dysfunction.

Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to examine the clinical outcomes during the implementation of a self-administered patient decision-aid (PtDA) for lupus. Methods We provided an effective computerized lupus PtDA in 15 rheumatology outpatient clinics 2019–2024 (including the COVID pandemic). We undertook Organizational Readiness to Implement Change Surveys (ORICs) and Team Learning and Psychological Safety Surveys (TLPSSs) at baseline. The primary study outcome objective measure, percent penetration/reach, was defined as the number of patients who viewed the lupus PtDA at the end of the study, divided by the total number of eligible patients (times 100). We used validated clinical personnel surveys to examine the perceived lupus PtDA appropriateness, acceptability, feasibility, success, and permanence, at 4 months, 12 months and 24 months post-PtDA implementation. Results Among the sites, the clinical personnels’ (n = 184) baseline ORIC commitment and efficacy scores (a 0–5 scale, higher = better) ranged from 3.5 to 4.2, and 3.4 to 4.4, respectively; the TLPSS scores (a 0–7 scale, higher = better) were 3.9–5.5 for internal learning, 3.7–5.6 for external learning, and 4.3–5.5 for psychological safety. The penetration (primary outcome) among 15 geographically diverse US rheumatology clinics ranged from 3% to 44%. We found that the total number of providers in the clinic was positively associated with higher penetration. Clinical personnel–perceived lupus PtDA outcomes were optimal at 4 months (all scale scores ranged from 1 to 5, higher = better): (i) appropriateness, 3.43 (s.d. 0.86); (ii) acceptability, 3.53 (s.d. 0.83); (iii) feasibility, 3.44 (s.d. 0.71); (iv) success, 3.41 (s.d. 0.73); and (v) permanence, 3.22 (s.d. 0.74). Conclusion We implemented a lupus PtDA with varied success rates during the COVID pandemic; more providers were associated with higher clinic penetration. Clinical personnel perceived high lupus PtDA appropriateness, acceptability, feasibility, success, and permanence that persisted up to 24 months. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03735238.

Objective: Pulmonary involvement is commonly observed in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), presenting with manifestations such as diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, inflammatory infiltrates, pulmonary nodules, and tracheobronchial disease. We aimed to identify distinct subgroups of tracheobronchial disease patterns in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) using latent class analysis (LCA), and to evaluate their clinical characteristics and outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records of patients aged >18 years diagnosed with AAV and tracheobronchial disease between 1 January 2002 and 6 September 2022. Patients with follow-up <6 months were excluded. LCA was employed to identify disease subtypes based on 10 pre-defined indicators. Maximum likelihood estimation with 10 repetitions per model ensured robustness in model selection, guided by the Akaike information criterion (AIC). Patient and disease characteristics were summarized and compared across predicted classes. Statistical analyses included Kruskal–Wallis and Fisher’s exact tests for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. The primary outcome was time to relapse of the tracheobronchial inflammation after starting immunosuppressive medication, analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank tests. Secondary outcomes included severity of pulmonary disease on pulmonary function tests, endoscopic interventions, tracheostomy, or mortality during follow-up. Results: Among 136 identified AAV patients assessed for tracheobronchial involvement, 111 (81.6%) were included after excluding 25 without tracheal or bronchial disease. Predominant findings included subglottic stenosis (91.0%), lower tracheal stenosis (16.2%), and bronchial stenosis (17.1%). LCA identified a three-class model as optimal: tracheal predominant (n = 94), tracheobronchial (n = 12), and bronchial predominant (n = 5). Tracheal predominant patients showed reduced risk of ear, eye, and lower respiratory manifestations, with milder obstruction on pulmonary function testing (PFT). Tracheobronchial-class patients were prone to saddle nose deformity (50%), extensive lower respiratory involvement (91.7%), and renal disease (66.7%). Bronchial predominant patients exhibited severe obstructive disease (median forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)% predicted: 58, IQR 34–66; FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio: 56.9, interquartile range (IQR) 43–63.3) but lacked systemic AAV manifestations. LCA classes did not predict outcomes such as endoscopic intervention, tracheostomy, recurrent tracheobronchial narrowing, or mortality. Conclusion: LCA shows promise in subtype stratification of AAV patients, yet its utility in predicting outcomes and guiding treatment remains limited based on our analysis. Future studies with enhanced phenotypic data and larger cohorts are warranted to improve predictive accuracy.

Background/Objective: To investigate the effect of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and rituximab (RTX) on pulmonary function test (PFT) results in a mixed cohort of patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), longitudinally followed up for 1 year in a single academic center. Methods: Patients with CTD-ILD were identified in electronic medical records from 1 January 2009 to 30 April 2019. Prescribed MMF and RTX doses, dosage changes, and therapy plans were analyzed individually with improvement in PFT outcomes determined using multivariable linear regression models during 12-month follow-up. Results: Forty-seven patients with CTD-ILD, treated with MMF, RTX, or both, were included. Patients on combined MMF and RTX had worse PFT outcomes at baseline compared with patients on monotherapy. Substantial improvement was observed among all PFT outcomes from baseline to 12 months, regardless of medication dosage or therapy plans. The diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) worsened by an average of 7.21 mL/(min*mmHg) (95% CI, 4.08–10.33; p < 0.001) among patients on RTX compared to combined therapy. Patients on higher doses of MMF at baseline experienced an average increase of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.04–1.82) units in DLCO from baseline to 6 months (p = 0.04) and a 2.79% (95% CI, 0.61–4.97%) increase in DLCO from 6 to 12 months (p = 0.02) within patients on concurrent RTX at 6-month follow-up. Conclusions: The treatment of CTD-ILD with MMF and/or RTX was associated with overall improvement in PFT outcomes. Combined therapy resulted in significant improvements in DLCO compared with monotherapy. Higher doses of MMF also provided greater improvements in DLCO.

ObjectiveNew‐onset and relapsed dermatomyositis (DM) has been reported following SARS‐CoV‐2 infection or COVID‐19 vaccination. This study aims to show the characteristics of a DM cohort after COVID‐19 infection and vaccination.MethodsA retrospective review was performed on patients treated for DM between March 1, 2020, and October 31, 2022. Charts were evaluated for the presence of new‐onset DM or relapse of preexisting DM following either SARS‐CoV‐2 infection or COVID‐19 vaccination. Data on symptom onset, timing of vaccination, type of vaccination, and disease characteristics were collected.ResultsNinety‐eight patients treated for DM at our institution in the Division of Rheumatology were included. In total, 12 of 98 patients (12.2%) experienced DM symptoms (either incident or relapse) following either infection or vaccination. Of the 12 patients who developed incident disease or relapse, 7 (58.3%) developed postinfection symptoms, and 8 (66.7%) developed symptoms after vaccination (3 patients had symptoms following both infection and vaccination). The mean onset of symptoms following COVID‐19 infection was 3.2 days (median 0.5 days), and mean onset following COVID‐19 vaccination was 5.75 days (median 3.5 days). Nine of 12 patients (75%) had a positive myositis‐specific antibody, and the remaining 3 (25%) had myositis‐associated antibodies. There was no predominant vaccine associated with the development of postvaccination DM symptoms.ConclusionThis retrospective review revealed a strong temporal relationship between DM symptoms and COVID‐19 infection or vaccination in 12.2% of all patients with DM evaluated in our clinic during the pandemic. Additional studies are required to understand the possible pathophysiology behind this association.

ObjectiveDue to an aging population, increasing prevalence of rheumatic disease, and a growing supply and demand gap of rheumatology providers, innovative solutions are needed to meet the needs of persons with rheumatic conditions. Nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) have been identified as a group of health professionals who could help address the workforce shortage. The Executive Committee of the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (ARHP), a division of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), charged a task force to facilitate the preparation of NPs/PAs to work in a rheumatology practice setting.MethodsThe task force, consisting of private practice and academic rheumatologists, and NPs and PAs, from both adult and pediatric settings, conducted a needs assessment survey of current NPs and PAs to identify mechanisms for acquiring rheumatology knowledge. Through face‐to‐face and webinar meetings, and incorporating stakeholder feedback, the task force designed a rheumatology curriculum outline to enrich the training of new NPs and PAs joining rheumatology practice.ResultsInformed by the needs assessment data and stakeholders, an NP/PA rheumatology curriculum outline was developed and endorsed by the ACR Board of Directors for use by community‐based and academic rheumatology practices, whether pediatric or adult, who desire to add NPs and PAs to their practice setting.ConclusionAs rheumatology is facing workforce shortages, the ACR/ARHP rheumatology curriculum outline can be utilized to train NPs and PAs and create more efficient integration of NPs and PAs into rheumatology practice.