Background: Segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM) is a non-inflammatory vasculopathy that primarily affects the abdominal visceral arteries leading to hemorrhage, ischemia, or pseudoaneurysms. Its presentation can be mimicked by other vasculopathies including vasculitis involving the medium-sized blood vessels making it difficult to diagnose. Case Presentation: A 55-year-old woman presented with a two-hour history of sudden-onset, severe epigastric pain radiating to the chest. She was noted to be hypotensive with low hemoglobin 8.8 g/dL suspicious for a hemorrhagic cause. Her case was complicated by elevated international normalized ratio 3.7 in the setting of warfarin therapy for the mechanical mitral valve. The remainder of her complete blood count, complete metabolic panel, inflammatory markers, autoantibody serologies, and infectious testing were negative. Abdominal computed tomography angiogram revealed hemoperitoneum, bilateral renal infarctions, a large mesenteric hematoma, aneurysmal disease of the common hepatic and inferior mesenteric arteries, thrombosis and proximal dissection of the superior mesenteric artery, acute thrombosis of the left external iliac vein, and multiple sites of arterial extravasation from the pancreaticoduodenal artery and its branches. Mesenteric artery angiogram showed multivessel visceral artery aneurysms and stenoses characteristic of SAM for which she underwent transcatheter arterial embolization of the bleeding vascular bed. We provide a narrative literature review with a focus on common presentations and differentiating characteristics of vasculopathies that can involve medium-sized blood vessels. It is important to accurately diagnose SAM and its potential mimics as management strategies differ. Conclusions: SAM presents with medium vessel vasculopathy without vasculitis. Differentiation from mimics can be difficult but aided by familiarity of their characteristic findings and differentiating clinical characteristics.
Longitudinal Study of Patients with Connective Tissue Disease–Interstitial Lung Disease and Response to Mycophenolate Mofetil and Rituximab
Background/Objective: To investigate the effect of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and rituximab (RTX) on pulmonary function test (PFT) results in a mixed cohort of patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), longitudinally followed up for 1 year in a single academic center. Methods: Patients with CTD-ILD were identified in electronic medical records from 1 January 2009 to 30 April 2019. Prescribed MMF and RTX doses, dosage changes, and therapy plans were analyzed individually with improvement in PFT outcomes determined using multivariable linear regression models during 12-month follow-up. Results: Forty-seven patients with CTD-ILD, treated with MMF, RTX, or both, were included. Patients on combined MMF and RTX had worse PFT outcomes at baseline compared with patients on monotherapy. Substantial improvement was observed among all PFT outcomes from baseline to 12 months, regardless of medication dosage or therapy plans. The diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) worsened by an average of 7.21 mL/(min*mmHg) (95% CI, 4.08–10.33; p < 0.001) among patients on RTX compared to combined therapy. Patients on higher doses of MMF at baseline experienced an average increase of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.04–1.82) units in DLCO from baseline to 6 months (p = 0.04) and a 2.79% (95% CI, 0.61–4.97%) increase in DLCO from 6 to 12 months (p = 0.02) within patients on concurrent RTX at 6-month follow-up. Conclusions: The treatment of CTD-ILD with MMF and/or RTX was associated with overall improvement in PFT outcomes. Combined therapy resulted in significant improvements in DLCO compared with monotherapy. Higher doses of MMF also provided greater improvements in DLCO.