Rosenthal, Allison

Introduction: In Cohorts 1+2 of the ZUMA-1 Phase 1/2 study of axi-cel in R/R LBCL, 11% and 31% of patients (pts) experienced Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or neurologic evenets), respectively. To minimize the toxicities seen with axi-cel, a safety management cohort, Cohort 6 (N=40), was added to evaluate whether prophylactic (ppx) corticosteroids (CS) could decrease grade ≥ 3 CRS or ICANS. The 2-year update of ZUMA-1 Cohort 6 showed no grade ≥3 CRS and 15% grade ≥3 ICANS without any difference in objective response rate (ORR) or complete response rate (CR) when compared to cohorts 1+2 (Oluwole Blood 2022). The FDA had previously approved an update to the prescribing information for axi-cel to include use of ppx CS across all approved indications in January 2022. However, ppx CS is not a mandatory standard treatment and we sought to establish the clinical outcomes in the real-world practice. Methods: To assess the clinical outcomes of pts receiving ppx CS, we conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of pts with R/R LBCL who were treated with axi-cel since the FDA approval of ppx CS in January 2022. Baseline characteristics, toxicities, and efficacy were compared between the no ppx and ppx CS groups. CRS and ICANS were graded based on ASTCT 2019 guidelines. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as time from axi-cel infusion to progression, re-treatment, or death. Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from axi-cel infusion to death due to any cause. Results: A total of 66 pts at 5 centers received axi-cel between Jan 31, 2022, and June 20, 2023. Thirty-five (52%) pts received ppx CS, with a median age of 63 years (26-85 years). By histology, 75% (n=50) of the pts had DLBCL, 13.6% (n=9) had high grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL), 9.1% (n=6) had transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL) and 1.5% (n=1) primary mediastinal LBCL (PMBCL). 59% of the pts (n=37) had IPI >2 and 66% (n=43) had stage III/IV disease. The baseline characteristics at the time of apheresis are shown in Table 1 and were comparable between the 2 groups, except for more HGBL, fewer prior lines of therapy and longer median time from apheresis to axi-cel infusion in the ppx CS group. Among the entire cohort, only 37% (n=25) met ZUMA-1 eligibility criteria at the time of lymphodepletion, and 67% (n=44) needed bridging therapy. Any grade CRS occurred in 88% (n=58) of the pts, with grade ≥2 CRS in 38% (n=25). Any grade ICANS occurred in 55% (n=37) of the pts, with grade ≥2 ICANS in 41% (n=27). Any grade ICANS was significantly lower in the ppx CS group than the no ppx group (45.7% vs 65.5%). The rates of any grade CRS, grade ≥2 CRS, grade ≥2 ICANS, the median time to CRS onset, ICANS onset, CRS duration, and ICANS duration were comparable between the 2 groups. Tocilizumab and steroids use was similar between two groups with a trend towards less ICU admission in patients in the ppx CS group. Overall, 14 (21%) pts developed infectious complications within 30 days of axi-cel infusion. The day 30 ORR was 84% and was comparable between the 2 groups (77% in the ppx group vs 93% in the no ppx group). The CR was 45.7% in ppx CS group compared to 65.5% in no ppx group. At a median follow up of 219 days (27-1178), 37 (56.1%) pts had progressed and 25 (37.9%) pts had died. The number of days to progress was significantly lower in the ppx CS arm. The median EFS and OS were not significant between the 2 groups. Conclusions: This multicenter retrospective study showed that the efficacy of treatment with axi-cel in R/R LBCL did not decrease with the use of ppx CS. No significant differences in efficacy or CAR-T-associated toxicities were noted in the 2 groups, potentially due to selective use with patients at presumed higher risk of severe CRS and ICANS. A larger dataset and longer follow-up is needed for risk-stratified analysis and the study is ongoing.

Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) has revolutionized the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Despite having an increased risk of NHL, patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease (AID) were excluded from pivotal CAR-T trials due to concerns that CAR-T may exacerbate AID. As a result, there are limited data on the safety and efficacy of CAR-T for NHL in patients with AID. Interestingly, there is also growing evidence that CAR-T can be therapeutically effective for AID, such as in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). As CAR-T utilization for NHL increases, it is essential to characterize the safety and efficacy of this potentially curative therapy in patients with AID. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of AID on outcomes in patients treated with commercial CD19-targeted CAR-T for NHL. Methods: Following Institutional Review Board approval, we conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients who were treated with commercial CD19-targeted CAR-T for NHL and had a pre-existing AID across the Mayo Clinic Enterprise (Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota) between January 2018 and May 2023. Variables collected included age, gender, NHL type, AID type, and CAR-T product. Efficacy outcomes, including response rates at 6 and 12 months after CAR-T, were collected. Toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), were collected and analyzed. Our chart review for AID included SLE, sarcoidosis, ulcerative colitis, celiac disease, pernicious anemia, Crohn's disease, psoriasis, Sjogren's syndrome, hypothyroidism (Hashimoto's disease), hyperthyroidism (Graves' disease), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), vasculitis, scleroderma, and mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD). Results: A total of 235 patients who received commercial CD19-targeted CAR-T for NHL across the Mayo Clinic Enterprise were identified (Table 1). Of these 235 patients, 27 had a pre-existing AID and 208 did not. The median age was 66 years (range 39-81) for patients with AID and 59 years (range 18-88) for patients without AID. Over half of the patients were male (59% of patients with AID and 51% of patients without AID). The most common NHL type was diffuse large B cell lymphoma (41% of patients with AID and 56% of patients without AID). Most patients received axicabtagene ciloleucel (85% of patients with AID and 84% of patients without AID). The most common AID was hypothyroidism (81%, n=22), although other conditions were also identified, including RA (11%, n=3), SLE (4%, n=1), pulmonary sarcoidosis (4%, n=1), psoriasis (4%, n=1), and MCTD (4%, n=1). Two patients had more than one AID. Median follow-up was 18 months (range 1-36) for patients with AID and 14 months (range 2-49) for patients without AID. Six months after CAR-T, the complete response (CR) rate was 77.2% and 45.1% in patients with AID and without AID, respectively (p=0.0042). Twelve months after CAR-T, the CR rate was 50% and 31.4% in patients with AID and without AID, respectively (p=0.0801). CRS of any grade occurred in 78% and 88% of patients with and without AID, respectively. ICANS of any grade occurred in 41% and 54% of patients with and without AID, respectively. Conclusion: AID did not appear to adversely impact the safety or efficacy of CAR-T for NHL. Limitations of our study include the small number of patients with AID and the fact that the most common AID was hypothyroidism. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these findings. Additional data are needed to characterize the impact of CAR-T for NHL on AID outcomes and to describe the effect of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs on NHL outcomes after CAR-T.

Background: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare and aggressive form of NHL isolated to the central nervous system or vitreoretinal space. Despite high initial rates of responses to available therapies, most PCNLS relapse in two years, presenting a very poor prognosis. Combination with novel therapies may overcome resistance (Guidetti 2023a). Upregulation of the B-cell receptor (BCR/NF-κB) and toll-like receptor (TLR)/NF-κB) signaling axis have been identified as key pathways in the pathogenesis of PCNSL. MYD88 L265P, a widely expressed somatic mutation in more than 70% of PCNSL patients, activates NF-κB signaling through stimulation of BTK and IRAK4. Emavusertib (CA-4948) is a novel, potent oral inhibitor of interleukin 1 receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK4), with additional inhibitory activity against FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) and CDC-like kinases (CLK1/2/4). Targeted inhibition of IRAK4 with emavusertib in PCNSL xenografts indicated sufficient blood brain barrier penetration of emavusertib, target inhibition, and antitumor activity (von Roemeling 2022). Further preclinical studies have demonstrated that emavusertib synergizes with ibrutinib and can re-sensitize and overcome resistance to BTK inhibitors (Guidetti 2023a and 2023b). Initial clinical data have reported responses in BTK-resistant PCNSL and good tolerance of the combination (Iqbal 2022; Grommes 2023). Study Design: This is an ongoing multi-center, open-label trial (NCT03328078) in adult patients with hematologic malignancies to evaluate the safety, PK, and anti-cancer activity of oral administration of emavusertib alone or in combination with ibrutinib. Part Bis an open trial expansion cohort with BTKi relapsed or refractory PCNSL. About 20 evaluable PCNSL patients will be enrolled globally. Patients will receive oral CA-4948 at 100 or 200 mg BID in combination with ibrutinib at 560 mg QD in 28-day cycles until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint is expanded safety/tolerability; secondary endpoints include ORR, DOR, PFS, OS, and pharmacokinetics. Key inclusion criteria for this expansion cohort: pathologically confirmed diagnosis of PCNSL with evidence of disease progression, measurable disease, relapsed or refractory with no more than 3 lines of prior anti-PCNSL therapy (including BTKi), and absence of residual Grade ≥2 toxicity from prior therapy. Key exclusion criteria: intraocular PCNSL without brain lesion or CSF involvement or significant co-morbidity. Key clinical assessments include brain imaging, CSF- and ocular examinations.

Background: QOL can be affected by disease burden, side effects of treatment, and psychosocial effects of living with cancer. Although MZL is considered incurable, we previously found that patients diagnosed from 2002-2015 had a good QOL both at baseline (BL) and the first decade after diagnosis, regardless of treatment choice (Bommier et al., submitted). Here, we evaluate whether these findings can be extended to the 2015-2020 treatment era and a more diverse US cohort. Methods: Adults with newly diagnosed MZL from 8 academic centers were prospectively enrolled within 6 months of diagnosis from 2015-2020 in the LEO cohort (NCT02736357). Participants were actively followed for disease progression/relapse, retreatment and death. QOL was measured at BL, and at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years after diagnosis using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) scale (range 0-164), which consists of the FACT-General (FACT-G, range 0-104) plus a lymphoma-specific scale (range 0-60). Total FACT-G measures 4 QOL domains (range): physical (0-28), social/family (0-28), emotional (0-24), and functional (0-28) well-being (WB). We also used the Trial Outcome Index (TOI; range 0-112), which consists of FACT-G physical and functional WB plus the lymphoma-specific scale and is commonly used as an endpoint in treatment trials. All MZL patients with both BL and at least one follow-up QOL questionnaire were eligible for analysis. Patients were grouped by initial management: active surveillance (observation), local/antibiotic therapy (radiation, surgery, or anti- H. pylori therapy), or systemic therapy (chemotherapy, targeted agents, or antibody therapy). Change in QOL scores over time was analyzed using mixed models for repeated measurements, and initial treatment groups were compared. Results: Of 384 patients, 60% were female, 91% were White, 6.6% were Black/African American, and 13% were Hispanic (all races). The median age was 64 years (range 19-94). For initial management, 28% (N=106) were observed, 31% (N=118) received local/antibiotic therapy, and 42% (N=160) received systemic therapy. Across treatment groups, there were no significant differences by age, gender, race, or performance status, while there were differences by Hispanic ethnicity (p=0.006), Ann Arbor stage (p<0.001) and MALT-IPI score (p<0.001) (Table). At BL, patients receiving systemic therapy had lower physical WB (p=0.008), emotional WB (p=0.04), functional WB (p=0.03), FACT-G total score (p=0.008), lymphoma subscale (p<0.001), FACT-Lym (p=0.001) and TOI (p<0.001) compared to observation and local/antibiotic therapy (Table). While FACT-G total scores were largely stable through 5 years after diagnosis, social/family WB declined from BL for patients initially receiving either local/antibiotic therapy (mean at 1-year -1.4, p<0.05; 2-year -2.1, p<0.05; 3-year -1.6, p<0.05; 5-year-2.9, p<0.05) or systemic therapy (mean at 2-year -1.2 , p<0.05; 3-year -1.4, p<0.05; and 5-year -1.2, p<0.05), while this was stable for observed patients. In patients receiving initial systemic therapy, there was a transient improvement in the lymphoma-specific scale (mean +1.7, p<0.05) and TOI (mean +3.7, p<0.05). Otherwise, QOL remained stable over time and global QoL (FACT-G, FACT-Lym), TOI, Lymphoma-specific scale (Figure), and the other FACT-G subscales (physical, emotional, or functional WB) did not differ by initial treatment strategy. Conclusions: In the diverse LEO cohort from the recent treatment era, we confirm our prior findings for newly diagnosed MZL patients that QOL is globally stable over the first 5 years after diagnosis; emotional WB is not associated with initial treatment type, providing evidence that being initially observed does not negatively impact emotional health; and there is a decline in social/family WB (support from friends and family, family acceptance of illness, family communication, close to partner), which supports the need to consider interventions for patients to address these unmet needs. In addition, this study extends these findings to the lymphoma-specific scale, FACT-Lym, and TOI, which all showing largely stable trends in the 5 years after diagnosis and suggest that recent MZL treatment strategies, including systemic therapies, neither impair nor improve QOL.

Background: The new standard of care for fit patients with refractory or early relapse of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. However, for patients with a relapse ≥12 months after completing frontline therapy, salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains the standard of care. There is a need to characterize such patients and their survival in view of the recent shift in treatment paradigm. Methods: Patients with DLBCL that relapsed ≥12 months after R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like frontline therapy who underwent salvage therapy and ASCT at Mayo Clinic or University of Iowa between 07/2000 and 4/2020 were identified from institutional lymphoma and transplant databases. Clinical characteristics, treatment information, and outcome data were abstracted. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the time of ASCT were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. Statistical analyses were performed in JMP v15. Results: A total of 158 patients with late relapsed DLBCL who underwent salvage chemotherapy and ASCT were identified. Baseline characteristics at relapse/ASCT are shown in Table 1. Median time from frontline therapy completion to 1st relapse was 26.4 months (range 12.0-152.4). Median age at relapse was 63 years (range 19-77), and 96 (61%) patients were male. A minority (3; 3%) had ECOG PS ≥2. 43 (52%) patients had an elevated serum LDH level, 70 (65%) had advanced stage disease, and 12 (11%) had >1 extranodal involvement. Median line of salvage therapy was 1 (range 1-3), and 17 (11%) patients required >1 line of salvage therapy. Best response before ASCT was complete response (CR) in 97 (61%) and partial response (PR) in 61 (39%). Median age at ASCT was 64 years (range 19-78). Median follow-up after ASCT was 91.5 months (95% CI 74.0-103.3). Median PFS and OS were 54.5 (95% CI 31.9-77.8) and 99.8 (95% CI 60.3-144.5) months, respectively. The 2-year PFS and OS rates were 64% (95% CI 56-71) and 81% (95% CI 74-87), respectively. No statistically significant difference in PFS was seen based on age at ASCT, sex, serum LDH, stage, or extranodal site involvement of >1 at relapse (Table 2). However, patients who required > 1 line of salvage therapy, compared to those requiring 1 line of salvage therapy, had significantly inferior PFS (median 6.1 vs 61.8 months, P <0.0001) and OS (17.8 vs 111.7 months, P <0.0004). There was no statistically significant difference in survival in patients who achieved CR vs PR prior to ASCT, with a median PFS of 61.8 vs 37.8 months( P=0.21) and a median OS of 111.7 vs 78.3 months ( P=0.62). Patients who achieved CR after 1 line of salvage therapy had the most favorable PFS and OS, with a median PFS of 65.6 vs 45.4 vs 6.1 vs 7.6 months ( P=0.0004) and a median OS of 133.0 vs 88.9 vs 24.2 vs 17.6 months ( P=0.004) in patients achieving CR after 1 line of salvage therapy vs PR after 1 line of salvage therapy vs CR after >1 line of salvage therapy vs PR after >1 line of salvage therapy, respectively (Table 2). In multivariate Cox regression models adjusted for age at ASCT and sex, patients requiring > 1 line of salvage therapy, compared to those who required 1 line of salvage therapy, had significantly inferior PFS with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.25 (95% CI 1.82-5.78, P <0.0001) and OS with a HR of 3.50 (95% CI 1.86-6.60, P=0.0001). However, there remained no significant difference in survival based on response status (CR vs PR) with a HR for PFS 0.78 (95% CI 0.52-1.17, P=0.23) and OS 0.93 (95% CI 0.58-1.47, P=0.74). Conclusions: Survival after ASCT was excellent in patients with late relapsed DLBCL achieving CR after 1 line of salvage chemotherapy. Favorable survival outcomes were seen in patients who achieved PR after 1 line of salvage therapy. These data support the current clinical practice of ASCT consolidation in these patients. However, post-ASCT survival was poor in patients who required more than 1 line of salvage chemotherapy, despite achieving a satisfactory response to subsequent lines of salvage therapy. Alternative treatment strategies such as CAR-T therapy should be considered in such patients.

Background: Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL) is considered indolent but incurable, with a variety of initial treatment strategies including observation. Quality of life (QOL) can be affected by disease burden, side effects of treatment, and psychosocial effects of living with an incurable cancer. However, little is known about long-term QOL in patients with MZL. We investigated QOL at baseline (BL), and up to nine years after a diagnosis of MZL. Methods: Newly diagnosed MZL patients aged 18 years and older were prospectively enrolled within 9 months of diagnosis in the Iowa/Mayo Clinic Molecular Epidemiology Resource from 9/2002 - 6/2015. Pathology was reviewed by a hematopathologist. All MZL participants with both BL and at least one follow-up (FU) QOL questionnaire were eligible for this analysis. QOL was measured at BL and years 1-, 2-, 3-, 6- and 9-year FU with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scale (range 0-108), which measures 4 QOL domains (range): physical (0-28), social/family (0-28), emotional (0-24), and functional (0-28) well-being (WB). Clinical data were abstracted according to a standard protocol and patients were systematically followed for events (progression, re-treatment, and death). Patients were grouped into initial management with active surveillance (observation), local/antibiotic therapy (including radiation, surgery, and anti- H. pylori therapy), or systemic therapy (including chemotherapy, targeted agents, or antibody therapy). Change in QOL scores over time was analyzed using mixed models for repeated measurements, and comparisons were made according to initial treatment group. Results: Of 324 participants in the analysis, 59% were female, 98% were White and the median age was 63 years. For initial management, 36% (N=118) were observed, 30% (N=96) received local/antibiotic therapy and 34% (N=110) received systemic therapy. Across the initial treatment groups, there were no statistically significant differences by age, gender, or performance status, while there were differences for Ann Arbor Stage IV (observation 50%, local/antibiotic 27%, systemic 67%, p<0.001) and MALT-IPI score 2+ (observation 23%, local/antibiotic 18%, systemic 28%, p<0.001). At BL, mean FACT-G total score was 85.7 (SD 13.1), and physical, social/family, emotional, and functional WB scores were 20.3 (SD 4.2), 24.4 (SD 3.9), 18.9 (SD 3.5), 22.1 (SD 5.3); these scores were similar across initial treatment groups (all p>0.05). FACT-G total score was largely stable over time by treatment group (Panel 1). However, it declined at years 6 (mean -4.0, p<0.05) and 9 (mean -3.7, p<0.05) in the observation group (Panel 2), driven by a decline in functional WB, although this change was not significantly different from the other treatment groups. Further, in comparison with other treatment groups, local therapy was associated with a short-term 1-year improvement of FACT-G total score (mean +2.8, p=0.04), driven by improvements in both functional and emotional WB. For the subscales, we identified two major trends irrespective of treatment group: an overall improvement from BL of emotional WB at years 1 (mean +0.6, p<0.05), 2 (mean +0.7, p<0.05), 3 (+1.3, p<0.05), 6 (+1, p<0.05), and 9 (+1.3, p<0.05) and an overall decline of social/family WB at years 1 (mean -1.1, p<0.05), 2 (mean -1.7, p<0.05), 3 (-2.1, p<0.05), 6 (-2.7, p<0.05), and 9 (-2.2, p<0.05). There was no notable change from BL for physical or functional WB. Conclusions: This analysis is the first to provide prospective real-world QOL data on a longitudinal cohort of MZL patients with long follow-up. At BL, initial treatment was associated with stage and MALT-IPI score, but not QOL. Except for the transient 1-year QOL improvement in patients under local/antibiotic therapy, initial treatment groups had no impact on QOL over time. Irrespective of treatment group, emotional WB showed improvement over time, suggesting psychosocial adaptation by the patient, as it was found in aggressive lymphomas (Thompson et al., 2018). Further, emotional WB over time did not vary across treatment groups, suggesting that being initially observed did not lead to more emotional stress than being actively treated. Finally, decline in social/family WB (support from friends, family, family acceptance of illness, family communication, close to partner) suggests a need to consider interventions to patients and families to address these needs.

Background Limited stage (stage I−II) disease is an uncommon presentation of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and its optimal management remains controversial. A British Columbia study (Leitch, Ann Oncol, 2003) and a Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) study (Murthy, Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk, 2014) suggested the importance of radiotherapy (RT). A National Cancer Database (NCDB) study in the pre-BTK inhibitor (BTKi) era showed that chemotherapy (Chemo) plus RT (Chemo+RT) improved overall survival (OS) compared to Chemo or RT alone (Gill, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2015). However, a retrospective International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group study (Dabaja, Ann Oncol, 2017) reported comparable OS with Chemo+RT vs Chemo or RT alone. The potential differences in OS with different frontline therapy modalities may be modified by subsequent therapies for relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease. In this study, we used the NCDB data to analyze frontline treatment patterns and outcomes of limited stage MCL in the pre-BTKi vs BTKi eras. Methods The NCDB was queried to identify patients with stage I−II MCL diagnosed in 2004−2020. Because the first BTKi ibrutinib was approved by the FDA for R/R MCL in November 2013, we defined 2004−2013 as pre-BTKi era and 2014−2020 as BTKi era. Frontline treatment modalities were categorized to RT alone, Chemo alone, or Chemo+RT. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model. Results Among 32,746 patients with newly diagnosed MCL in 2004−2020, 3,836 (11.7%) presented with stage I−II disease, with 2,428 having treatment information available. For patients diagnosed in the pre-BTKi era (n = 2005), 195 (9.7%) received RT alone, 1472 (73.4%) received Chemo alone, and 338 (16.9%) received Chemo+RT. For patients diagnosed in the BTKi era (n = 423), 45 (10.6%) received RT alone, 320 (75.7%) received Chemo alone, and 58 (13.7%) received Chemo+RT. Patients in the RT alone group were older (P <0.001) and had more females (P <0.001), but there were no statistically significant differences in Charlson-Deyo score, international prognostic index, or treating facility type (academic vs non-academic). For patients with stage I disease, in the pre-BTKi era, patients treated with Chemo+RT (n = 182) had improved OS compared to those treated with RT alone (n = 141) or Chemo alone (n = 647), with a 5-year OS of 75.4% vs 71.8% vs 61.4% (P <0.001). Similar results were observed in the BTKi-era, with a 5-year OS of 83.6% vs 69.5% vs 62.9% (P <0.001) for patients treated with Chemo+RT (n = 31), RT alone (n = 30), or Chemo alone (n = 130), respectively. After adjusting for age and sex, Chemo+RT was associated with improved OS compared to Chemo alone (pre-BTKi era, HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.46−0.75, P <0.001; BTKi era, HR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.14−0.79, P = 0.013), but not compared to RT alone (pre-BTKi era, HR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.23−1.68, P = 0.343; BTKi era, HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.56−1.05, P = 0.10) (Figure 1A). For patients with stage II disease, in the pre-BTKi era, patients treated with Chemo+RT (n = 156) had improved OS compared to those treated with RT alone (n = 54) or Chemo alone (n = 825), with a 5-year OS of 70.0% vs 47.3% vs 58.4% (P <0.001). In the BTKi-era, patients treated with Chemo+RT (n = 27) or RT alone (n = 15) both had improved OS compared to those treated with Chemo alone (n = 190), with a 5-year OS of 77.2% vs 78.8% vs 61.9% (P = 0.004) . After adjusting for age and sex, Chemo+RT was associated with improved OS compared to Chemo alone in BTKi era only (pre-BTKi era, HR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.67−1.07, P = 0.165; BTKi era, HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.25−0.95, P = 0.034), but not compared to RT alone (pre-BTKi era, HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.53−1.13, P = 0.185; BTKi era, HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.35−2.67, P = 0.952) (Figure 1B). Conclusions Treatment pattern for limited stage MCL has not changed significantly from the pre-BTKi era to the BTKi era, with approximately 15% of patients receiving Chemo+RT, 10% RT alone and 75% Chemo alone. In the BTKi era, Chemo+RT appeared to be associated with better OS compared to Chemo alone but not compared to RT alone. Interpretation of the results requires caution because (1) patient numbers are small in Chemo+RT and RT alone groups, (2) longer follow-up may be needed, and (3) selection of therapy was not random, eg, patients receiving Chemo alone may have had higher disease burden such as bulky disease and/or non-contiguous stage II involvement but these details are not available in NCDB.

Background: Emavusertib (CA-4948) is a novel oral inhibitor of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK4), which is essential for toll-like receptor (TLR) and interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1R) signaling in B cell proliferation. Additional inhibitory activity against FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) and CDC-like kinases (CLK1/2/4) is also present in emavusertib. IRAK4 forms a Myddosome complex with MYD88 adaptor protein and drives overactivation ofnuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), causing inflammation and tumor growth. Emavusertib has been reported to be well tolerated and active as monotherapy in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (Nowakowski 2020). Preclinical studies demonstrated that tumor resistance and survival via IRAK4 activation could be delayed or reversed. Emavusertib crossed the blood-brain barrier in a murine PDX model of PCNS lymphoma, blocked the activated IRAK4 pathway, and induced tumor response and prolonged survival (von Roemeling 2022). In combination with Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, emavusertib showed in vitro synergy and re-sensitization of resistant cell lines, overcoming BTK resistance (Guidetti 2023a and 2023b). In vivo synergy in B-cell NHL was also demonstrated. Adaptive chemotherapy treatment resistance through IRAK4 upregulation and activation was also described in other disease models (Melgar 2019, Li 2019). This abstract presents preliminary efficacy and safety data of emavusertib + ibrutinib in R/R NHL patients. Aim:Assessment of safety and clinical activity of emavusertib in combination with ibrutinib. Methods: This is an ongoing open-label trial (NCT03328078) of emavusertib as monotherapy and in combination with ibrutinib. Part A1 - completed; dose escalation of emavusertib as monotherapy; the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) is 300 mg BID with continuous oral dosing (Nowakowski 2020). Part A2 - completed; dose escalation of emavusertib in combination with ibrutinib at 420 and 560 mg QD (Joffe 2022). Part B - ongoing; an expansion cohort of PCNSL patients with resistance to prior BTK inhibitors for additional safety and efficacy related to exposure: emavusertib at 100 or 200 mg BID + ibrutinib at 560 mg QD in 28-Day cycles. Results:As of 19 July 2023, 18 heavily pretreated NHL (including five PCNSL) patients received emavusertib at 100, 200, or 300 mg BID in combination with full ibrutinib doses per label. Median age was 63.5 years (range 50-92). Median number of prior lines of anti-cancer therapies was 3 (range 1-10). Eleven of 18 patients failed prior BTK inhibitors. Median treatment duration was 95.5 days (21-587 days), suggesting acceptable safety and tolerability. No DLTs were observed at the 200 mg BID dose level, and two reversible DLTs (stomatitis and syncope) were observed at the 300 mg BID dose level. The preliminary efficacy data of 16 evaluable patients in combination with ibrutinib showed 5 CRs (2 MCL, 3 PCNSL) and 1 PR (1 CLL). All 3 PCNSL patients with CR were previously treated with BTK inhibitors. Conclusion: The combination ofemavusertib plus ibrutinib (ema+ibr) is well tolerated with an acceptable long-term safety profile and promising efficacy, showing several objective responses in heavily pretreated and/or BTK inhibitor resistant patients. Emavusertib may have the potential to overcome BTK inhibitor resistance and the combination of ema+ibr has the potential to show increased anti-cancer activity compared to ibrutinib monotherapy.

Background: Understanding the symptoms and quality of life (QOL) over time of adults with follicular lymphoma (FL) is important for treatment decision-making and clinical management. However, there are limited population-level data on the long-term QOL of adults with FL. We aim to describe the real-world, long-term QOL of adults with newly diagnosed FL up to 5/6 years after diagnosis. Methods: We used the Mayo Clinic/Iowa Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) and the multi-institutional Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) to identify adults with grade 1-3A FL who completed QOL surveys at baseline and follow-up. Participants with lymphoma were prospectively enrolled within 9 months of diagnosis in the MER cohort from 2002-2015 and within 6 months of diagnosis in the multi-institutional LEO cohort study across 8 cancer centers from 2015-2020. The LEO/MER cohort studies systematically collected information on disease status, QOL, health behaviors, and functional assessment. Treatments, disease relapses, and deaths were verified by medical record review. Treating physicians determined clinical management. QOL was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) at years 1, 2, 3, and 5/6 post-diagnosis. A higher FACT-G total score (range 0-108) indicated better QOL across 4 subscales (range): physical (0-28), social/family (0-28), emotional (0-24), and functional (0-28) well-being. We categorized participants based on their frontline management at time of diagnosis: “observation” (surveillance), “treatment” (systemic treatment with immunotherapy +/- chemotherapy), and “local” (radiation) groups. We employed a generalized linear mixed model to evaluate and compare the changes in QOL scores (as a continuous variable) from baseline for the observation, treatment, and local groups, adjusting for sex, race/ethnicity, age, FLIPI risk, and cohort (i.e., LEO or MER). We also evaluated QOL changes by FLIPI risk. Results: Our study included 1,544 participants with FL and QOL data. At the time of enrollment, median age was 61 years (range 19-91), 88% were non-Hispanic White, and 49% were female. Based on initial management, 529 (34%) were in the observation group, 880 (57%) were in the treatment group, and 135 (9%) were in the local group. FLIPI risk was high for 17% in the observation group, 29.3% in the treatment group, and 3% in the local group. The mean (standard deviation) baseline FACT-G total score was lowest in the treatment group with the following baseline scores: 86 (13) for the observation group, 83 (14) for the treatment group, and 88 (12) for the local group (Table 1). The observation and local groups reported a greater worsening of their baseline FACT-G total score vs the treatment group at both the 2-year (-1.2, -0.8 vs +1.8, respectively) and 5/6 year (-5.4, -6 vs. -1.6, respectively) timepoints (Figure 1). This appeared to be driven by worsened physical and functional well-being in the observation (-1.3, -2.2, respectively) and local (-0.9, -2.4, respectively) groups vs the treatment group (0, -0.3, respectively). These differences were statistically significant between the observation vs treatment groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the other subscales, i.e., social/family and emotional well-being, by frontline management. Social/family well-being decreased across all groups by 5/6 years (-2.3 in observation, -2.2 in treatment, and -3 in local, p<0.05). Regardless of FLIPI risk, the total FACT-G scores decreased within each FLIPI risk group at 5/6 years (-4.4 for low, -3.8 for intermediate, and -4.9 for high, p<0.05). This was primarily due to worsened social/family well-being (-2.4 for low, -2.2 for intermediate, and -3 for high, p<0.05) at 5/6 years. There was no statistically significant difference in QOL between FLIPI risk groups. Conclusion: This is one of the first and largest studies with real-world longitudinal QOL data for FL. Our study suggests that frontline systemic treatment initially improved QOL and resulted in a lower degree of QOL decline over time. Social/family well-being decreased over time regardless of frontline management or FLIPI risk. Further research is warranted to explore the impact of timing and specific systemic treatments on QOL, incorporate the patient/caregiver experience to address social/family well-being, and identify the clinical significance of our findings.

Purpose The predominant pattern of relapse for patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who undergo anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy (CART) involves sites previously involved by NHL. Bridging radiotherapy (BRT) has shown to be an effective bridging treatment with excellent local control rates. Our previous work defined limited/oligometastatic lymphoma as disease involving <5 sites. This study is the first to report on the role of BRT for patients with limited (<5 involved sites) disease prior to CART. Methods Following Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective review from 2018 to 2023 across 3 Mayo Clinic sites (Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota) was performed and identified 139 patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell NHL without bone marrow involvement who received CART and had <5 disease sites prior to leukapheresis. Ann Arbor staging was used to define the number of involved disease sites. An involved disease site included the Ann Arbor anatomical lymph node region(s) harboring the pathological lymph node(s) or any extranodal lesion. Bridging treatment (radiation and/or systemic therapy) was defined as treatment administered between leukapheresis and CART infusion. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS),defined from CART infusion to any disease progression or initiation of post-CART consolidative/salvage therapy. Secondary endpoints included progression -free survival (PFS),defined from CART infusion to any disease progression, and overall survival (OS), defined from CART infusion to death. Results Prior to CART infusion, 44 (32%) patients received BRT and 95 (68%) did not. Bridging systemic therapy was given to 5 (11%) and 34 (36%) patients in the BRT and no BRT groups, respectively (p=0.003). The median number of involved disease sites prior to leukapheresis was 2 (range: 1-4). There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics prior to CART infusion between the BRT and no BRT groups, except for extranodal involvement that was more common in the BRT group (Table 1). The median equivalent 2 Gy dose was 27 Gy (Interquartile range 23-34), and the most common BRT regimen was 20 Gy in 5 fractions. Among the 44 BRT patients, 34 received radiation to all visible PET-avid disease sites, and 10 received radiation to some but not all disease sites. The median follow-up was 20 months. The rate of grade ≥2 cytokine release syndrome was 41% in both groups (p=0.99). The rate of grade ≥2 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was 21% and 37% in the BRT and no BRT groups, respectively (p=0.059). There were no observed grade ≥3 BRT-related toxicities. Objective response rate by PET 5 point scale was higher in the BRT group (93% versus 79%; p=0.036). Crude rates of progression were 30% in BRT and 55% in no BRT patients, with 9/13 (69%) and 43/52 (83%) patients relapsing in pre-existing sites of disease present prior to CART infusion in the BRT and no BRT group, respectively. Seven (16%) BRT patients relapsed in the radiation field. The 2-year EFS was 50% in the BRT group and 39% in the no BRT group (p=0.01). The 2-year PFS was 55% in the BRT group and 45% in the no BRT group (p=0.017). The 2-year OS was 55% in the BRT group and 62% in the no BRT group (p=0.7). Intriguingly, patients who received BRT to all visible PET-avid disease sites (n=34) had further improvement in 2-year EFS (67% vs 39%, p=0.003) and 2-year PFS (71% vs 46%, p=0.008) compared to no BRT or patients who received BRT to some but not all visible disease sites (n=105). Nine patients (2 in BRT and 7 in no BRT groups) received consolidative radiotherapy for day 30 residual disease with only one patient subsequently experiencing progression. Twenty-five patients (6 in BRT and 19 in no BRT groups) received salvage/palliative RT for post-CART relapsed disease. Thirty-seven (39%) patients in the no BRT group remained without disease progression and did not receive radiation in the bridging, consolidative or salvage/palliative setting. Conclusion Bridging radiotherapy prior to CART infusion for patients with limited (<5 involved disease sites) r/r NHL appears to improve response rate, EFS, and PFS without causing significant toxicities. Approximately one third of patients who do not receive BRT will require subsequent post-CART radiation, and another third will remain free of radiation and disease progression.