Back to Authors

van Harten, Argonde C

Mayo Clinic

From the Alzheimer Center (A.C.v.H.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology (A.C.v.H., D.S.K., R.C.P.), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research (M.M.M., C.E.H., K.K.

Citations 6

Detection of Alzheimer's disease amyloid beta 1‐42, p‐tau, and t‐tau assays
Harten, Argonde C. van , Wiste, Heather J. , Weigand, Stephen D. , Kremers, Walter K. , Eichenlaub, Udo, Dyer, Roy B. , Jack, Clifford R. , Petersen, Ronald C. , van Harten, Argonde C, Jack, Clifford R , Kremers, Walter K , Mielke, Michelle M. , Algeciras‐Schimnich, Alicia , Knopman, David S.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | July 26, 2021 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 635-644

10.1002/alz.12406 Get It

Abstract Introduction We aimed to provide cut points for the automated Elecsys Alzheimer's disease (AD) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers. Methods Cut points for Elecsys amyloid beta 42 (Aβ42), total tau (t‐tau), hyperphosphorylated tau (p‐tau), and t‐tau/Aβ42 and p‐tau/Aβ42 ratios were evaluated in Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (n = 804) and Mayo Clinic Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (n = 70) participants. Results The t‐tau/Aβ42 and p‐tau/Aβ42 ratios had a higher percent agreement with normal/abnormal amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) than the individual CSF markers. Reciever Operating Characteristic (ROC)‐based cut points were 0.26 (0.24–0.27) for t‐tau/Aβ42 and 0.023 (0.020–0.025) for p‐tau/Aβ42. Ratio cut points derived from other cohorts performed as well in our cohort as our own did. Individual biomarkers had worse diagnostic properties and more variable results in terms of positive and negative percent agreement (PPA and NPA). Conclusion CSF t‐tau/Aβ42 and p‐tau/Aβ42 ratios are very robust indicators of AD. For individual biomarkers, the intended use should determine which cut point is chosen.
P‐tau/Aβ42 and Aβ42/40 ratios in CSF are equally predictive of amyloid PET status
Campbell, Michelle R. , Ashrafzadeh‐Kian, Susan , Petersen, Ronald C. , Syrjanen, Jeremy A. , Harten, Argonde C. van , Lowe, Val J. , Bornhorst, Joshua A. , van Harten, Argonde C, Algeciras-Schimnich, Alicia , Bornhorst, Joshua , Mielke, Michelle M. , Jack, Clifford R. , Algeciras‐Schimnich, Alicia

Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring | May 18, 2021 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/dad2.12190 Get It

Abstract Introduction Measurement of amyloid beta (Aβ40 and Aβ42) and tau (phosphorylated tau [p‐tau] and total tau [t‐tau]) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can be utilized to differentiate clinical and preclinical Alzheimer's disease dementia (AD) from other neurodegenerative processes. Methods CSF biomarkers were measured in 150 participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging and the Alzheimer's Disease Research Center. P‐tau/Aβ42 (Roche Elecsys, Fujirebio LUMIPULSE) and Aβ42/40 (Fujirebio LUMIPULSE) ratios were compared to one another and to amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) classification. Results Strong correlation was observed between LUMIPULSE p‐tau/Aβ42 and Aβ42/40, as well as Elecsys and LUMIPULSE p‐tau/Aβ42 and Aβ42/40 (Spearman's ρ = –0.827, –0.858, and 0.960, respectively). Concordance between LUMIPULSE p‐tau/Aβ42 and Aβ42/40 was 96% and between Elecsys p‐tau/Aβ42 and both LUMIPULSE ratios was 97%. All ratios had > 94% overall, positive, and negative percent agreement with amyloid PET classification. Discussion These data suggest that p‐tau/Aβ42 and Aβ42/40 ratios provide similar clinical information in the assessment of amyloid pathology.
Comment: Longevity gene KLOTHO may play a role in Alzheimer disease
Harten, Argonde C. van , van Harten, Argonde C

Neurology | March 14, 2019 | Volume: 92 | Issue: 16 | Pages: 751-751

10.1212/wnl.0000000000007302 Get It

Association of Cerebrospinal Fluid Neurofilament Light Protein With Risk of Mild Cognitive Impairment Among Individuals Without Cognitive Impairment
Kern, Silke , Syrjanen, Jeremy A. , Blennow, Kaj , Hagen, Clinton E., Harten, Argonde C. van , Jack, Clifford R. , Petersen, Ronald C. , Mielke, Michelle M. , van Harten, Argonde C, Jack, Clifford R , Mielke, Michelle M , Zetterberg, Henrik , Skoog, Ingmar , Wærn, Margda , Knopman, David S.

JAMA Neurology | November 12, 2018 | Volume: 76 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 187

10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3459 Get It