Abstract Background Noninvasive prenatal screening for common autosomal trisomies, sex chromosome aneuploidies and microdeletions vary by methodology and laboratory practice. The fetal portion of all cell-free DNA in the maternal circulation defines the fetal fraction (FF). The minimum specimen FF levels for reporting results vary between laboratories as well as the screening target (e.g., common trisomies vs select microdeletions). This variability can lead to confusion for both healthcare providers and patients. Methods Participants in the College of American Pathologists Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing 2021-B Exercise provided FF estimates for 3 manufactured samples. Responses to supplemental questions were also collected and analyzed. Results Overall, 72 of 77 participants responded. FF was measured by 66 participants using sequence counts (40), single nucleotide polymorphisms (15), fragment length (24), and Y chromosome sequences (24). Nearly half (48%) used multiple methods. For common trisomies, minimum FFs were none or <1% (n = 7), 1.0% to 3.9% (n = 35), 4.0% to 6.9% (n = 23), and ≥7.0% (n = 1); 4 participants did not measure FF. Challenge-specific FFs were variable with CVs of 13%, 15%, and 36%; the latter rate appears due to that sample’s fetal karyotype of 47,XYY. Comparing adjusted FF results for the 3 samples shows that 85% of participant results were within 20% of the consensus. Conclusions Using multiple methods to estimate FF was common, and cutoff levels for sample suitability varied widely. Within-laboratory FFs were less variable than between laboratories. Current FF estimates from clinical laboratories are not standardized and should be considered laboratory-specific.
Artifacts, Not Differences in Sex Development, Are the Predominant Cause of Phenotypic Sex Discordance With Prenatal Cell‐Free DNA Screening: A Review of 33 Cases
ABSTRACT Objective Although fetal sex chromosome complement prediction by prenatal cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) screening is highly accurate, discordance between the cfDNA‐inferred chromosomal sex and phenotypic sex observed via ultrasonography or at birth, that is, “fetal sex discordance”, does rarely occur. Such discordance may be caused by differences in sex development (DSD) or technical or biological artifacts. This study aims to provide insights into the proportion of fetal sex discordance cases caused by DSD versus non‐DSD artifacts. Method We retrospectively reviewed 122,748 cases that underwent diagnostic testing at the Mayo Clinic Cytogenetics Laboratory between 2015 and 2023. Thirty‐three singleton‐gestation cases tested for fetal sex discordances were identified. Results Fetal sex discordance was attributed to non‐DSD artifacts in 24 (73%) of the 33 patients. In these cases, the phenotypic sex matched the chromosomal sex revealed by diagnostic cytogenetic testing. The remaining 9 patients included one with mosaic 46,X,psu idic(Y)(q11.21)/45,X, 5 with 46,XY DSD, and 3 with 46,XX DSD. Conclusion The majority of fetal sex discordance cases are caused by non‐DSD artifacts rather than DSD. Accurate clinical counseling of fetal sex discordance requires distinguishing between DSD and non‐DSD causes, emphasizing the need for diagnostic cytogenetic testing.
Follow the LINE: A novel case of dilated cardiomyopathy caused by a LINE-1 insertion in the TTN gene
Abstract Objectives Protein-truncating variants in the TTN gene are a well-established cause of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). We report a novel case of DCM caused by a mobile element insertion (MEI) in TTN, through which we highlight the key features of MEIs in next-generation sequencing data. Because of the rarity of MEIs, the next-generation sequencing data features associated with these events may be mistaken as noise, potentially leading to missed diagnoses. Methods Next-generation sequencing gene panel testing for DCM was performed on a 17-year-old male patient presenting with severe left ventricular dilatation and systolic dysfunction. Manta was used for structural variant detection, followed by manual review of NGS data for potential structural variants. Results Manta detected a potential insertion in TTN. Manual review identified hallmark features consistent with a LINE-1 MEI. This finding was orthogonally confirmed by long-range polymerase chain reaction and gel electrophoresis, which indicated an insertion of approximately 4 to 5 kilobase pairs. The insertion disrupted the reading frame of TTN within an A-band exon, resulting in protein truncation that was classified as likely pathogenic. Conclusions This case expands the mutational spectrum of TTN protein-truncating variants. It also underscores the importance of recognizing rarer types of pathogenic variants (eg, MEIs) to produce accurate genetic diagnostics.
Genomic analysis of spermatocytic tumors demonstrates recurrent molecular alterations in cases with malignant clinical behavior
Abstract Uniparental disomy (UPD) is the inheritance of both chromosomal homologs from one parent. Depending on the chromosome involved and the parental origin, UPD may result in phenotypic abnormalities due to aberrant methylation patterns or unmasking recessive conditions in isodisomic regions. UPD primarily originates from somatic rescue of a single meiotically‐derived aneuploidy, most commonly a trisomy. Double UPD is exceedingly rare and triple UPD has not been previously described. Here, we report two unrelated clinical cases with UPD of multiple chromosomes; an 8‐month‐old male with maternal isodisomy of chromosome 7 and paternal isodisomy of chromosome 9, and a 4‐week‐old female with mixed paternal UPD for chromosomes 4, 10, and 14. These cases also demonstrate that although extremely rare, the detection of AOH on two or more chromosomes may warrant additional clinical and laboratory investigation such as methylation and STR marker analysis, especially when involving chromosomes known to be associated with imprinting disorders.
Most noninvasive prenatal screens failing due to inadequate fetal cell free DNA are negative for trisomy when repeated
AbstractObjectiveWe aimed to test for an association between the amount of circulating fetal cell‐free DNA and trisomy, and whether NIPS failure due to low fetal fraction indicates trisomy risk.MethodMaternal BMI, maternal age, fetal sex, gestational age, fetal cfDNA fraction, and NIPS results was collected on 2374 pregnancies. Additional clinical information was available for 1180 research consented patients. We investigated associations between fetal fraction and available variables and determined the success rate of repeat NIPS testing.ResultsFetal trisomy was marginally associated with decreased fetal fraction (P = .067). However, the proportions of trisomy events were not significantly increased in women who had failed NIPS due to low fetal fraction (<4%) (OR = 1.37 [0.3‐7.4]; P = .714). 66% of repeated NIPS after a second blood draw were successful.ConclusionFailure to meet the clinical cutoff of 4% fetal fraction established for NIPS accuracy did not suggest increased risk for trisomy in our cohort. Because repeat testing was successful in the majority of cases and most failures were explained by high BMI and low gestational age, a redraw may be an appropriate next step before invasive screening due to concerns for trisomic pregnancies.
Improving Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism-Based Fetal Fraction Estimation of Maternal Plasma Circulating Cell-Free DNA Using Bayesian Hierarchical Models