Niazi, Shehzad

Background: Unmet social needs may hinder health care providers’ ability to deliver suitable care. Telehealth has emerged as a mechanism to broaden care reach; however, limited studies have examined the relationships between telehealth services and social need outcomes. This study explores the impact of telehealth services, encompassing (1) telestroke, (2) telepsychiatry and addiction treatment, (3) teleconsultation and office visits,(4) tele-intensive care units, (5) telemonitoring postdischarge, (6) ongoing chronic care management, and (7) other remote monitoring, on social need performance outcomes. Methods: The 2022 American Hospital Association annual survey and the Area Health Resource Files, which include comprehensive hospital and community indicators, were utilized. A mixed-effects logistic regression was applied, analyzing 1,005 acute care general hospitals. Results: The results revealed that patients who received telemonitoring services after discharge were 1.72 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-2.88) times more likely to achieve better health outcomes compared with those who did not receive such services. These patients also experienced a significant decrease in the likelihood of requiring additional hospital or system services, with an odds ratio of 2.39 (95% CI: 1.32-4.00). Additionally, patients utilizing telepsychiatry and addiction treatment services had 1.66 times higher odds of reporting improved community health status (95% CI: 1.22-2.27). Lastly, patients who used teleconsultation and office visit services had 38% lower odds of experiencing poor community health status (95% CI: 0.40-0.95). Discussion: The findings highlight the potential of targeted telehealth services to positively impact health outcomes, reduce health care costs, and improve community health status.

This study aimed to explore contextual elements of the cancer experience that are consistently distressing and/or psychologically traumatic, as well as explore perceptions of Accelerated Resolution Therapy® (ART®) and its influence on the cancer experience. Using a qualitative descriptive design, semi-structured interviews were completed by 12 participants following the completion of ART. Interview data were analyzed using content analysis to identify major themes and patterns. Four themes included: (a) Cancer as the straw that broke the camel’s back, (b) ART® is different from previous therapy, (c) Don’t need to always be looking in the rearview mirror, and (d) Importance of early psychological intervention. Participants perceived that ART® was different and potentially more effective than other types of therapy they had previously received. Results support the diagnosis of cancer and the cumulative effects of previous life events and cancer-related stressors as traumatic events.

Importance: Social media is widely used by various segments of society. Its role as a tool of communication by the Public Health Departments in the U.S. remains unknown. Objective: To determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on social media following of the Public Health Departments of the 50 States of the U.S. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data were collected by visiting the Public Health Department web page for each social media platform. State-level demographics were collected from the U.S. Census Bureau. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention was utilized to collect information regarding the Governance of each State’s Public Health Department. Health rankings were collected from “America’s Health Rankings” 2019 Annual report from the United Health Foundation. The U.S. News and World Report Education Rankings were utilized to provide information regarding the public education of each State. Exposure: Data were pulled on 3 separate dates: first on March 5th (baseline and pre-national emergency declaration (NED) for COVID-19), March 18th (week following NED), and March 25th (2 weeks after NED). In addition, a variable identifying the total change across platforms was also created. All data were collected at the State level. Main Outcome: Overall, the social media following of the state Public Health Departments was very low. There was a significant increase in the public interest in following the Public Health Departments during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: With the declaration of National Emergency, there was a 150% increase in overall public following of the State Public Health Departments in the U.S. The increase was most noted in the Midwest and South regions of the U.S. The overall following in the pandemic “hotspots,” such as New York, California, and Florida, was significantly lower. Interesting correlations were noted between various demographic variables, health, and education ranking of the States and the social media following of their Health Departments. Conclusion and Relevance: Social media following of Public Health Departments across all States of the U.S. was very low. Though, the social media following significantly increased during the early course of the COVID-19 pandemic, but it still remains low. Significant opportunity exists for Public Health Departments to improve social media use to engage the public better.

AbstractRational, aims, and objectivesUnderstanding of barriers and successes associated with the implementation of electronic patient self‐reported measures (ePSRMs) within clinical settings are limited and have not been pursued utilizing implementation science frameworks. This qualitative study is designed to assess staff perceptions of an ePSRM implementation.MethodsThe study took place in an academic hospital's Consultation Liaison Psychiatry practice. Qualitative interviews were conducted with the staff and clinicians from the practice. Participants were directly involved with the implementation and use of the ePSRM system within the Psychiatry practice. Interviews were structured around the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE‐AIM) framework.ResultsParticipants reported increased patient engagement as well as efficiency and time savings. The intervention was perceived to be more challenging for older patients. Facilitators include communicating the ePSRM to patients prior to the care visit, having enough trained staff or super‐users who can assist with technical problems, and having a shorter questionnaire.ConclusionsOverall, assessment of the ePSRM implementation was positive. Staff and clinicians indicated benefits in time, effectiveness, and improvements in patient treatment. Results indicate that defining how the system would fit within the clinical workflow was key, as was a flexible and user‐friendly technology platform. The ePSRM implementation was dependent upon clinical involvement and interest in adoption, while barriers were associated with technical challenges as well as some patient difficulties, such as cognitive impairment. The use of the RE‐AIM framework is valuable as it allows for systematic assessment of the implementation and identifies areas in that implementation has succeeded or is lacking.

Key PointsCoexisting psychiatric comorbidities are associated with greater increased health care utilization and cost of care in patients with MM. Clinical complications of MM are seen more frequently in patients with coexisting psychiatric conditions.