Back to Authors

Schupack, D

0000-0002-8952-4577

Mayo Clinic

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Citations 2

Histologic response to steroids in eosinophilic esophagitis is dependent on delivery compound
Schupack, Daniel , Johnson, Kimberly R. , Akambase, Joseph , Geno, Debra M., Lavey, Crystal, Lennon, Ryan J. , Snyder, Diana L. , Katzka, David A. , Alexander, Jeffrey A. , Schupack, D , Johnson, Kimberly , Akambase, Joseph A , Geno, Debra, Ravi, Karthik

Diseases of the Esophagus | July 3, 2022 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/dote/doac040 Get It

Summary Topical steroids are commonly used in treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), but currently there is lack of data to clarify most effective regimen. We aimed to study the achievement of histologic remission using the same dose of budesonide in two different delivery formulations. Patients with established EoE treated with pharmacy compounded budesonide capsule or budesonide Rincinol gel (both 3 mg twice daily) were studied retrospectively. Those with pre-treatment and post-treatment histologic assessment were included with main endpoint being histologic remission. 103 patients (62 gel, 41 capsule) were included, with higher rate of histologic remission with gel (84 vs. 59%, P=0.004). A subset of patients in both groups had lack of steroid response (<50% drop in eosinophils) (15% for gel, 32% for capsule). Formulation/delivery vehicle of steroid treatments to esophageal mucosa in EoE appears important for treatment efficacy, with budesonide gel having higher likelihood of histologic remission compared to budesonide capsules in our population. A truly steroid refractory group appears likely in our population. Larger, prospective studies may help clarify best regimen of topical steroids in EoE and may work to identify patients likely to benefit from alternative therapies.
The clinical significance of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and hypercontractile esophagus in high resolution esophageal manometry
Schupack, Daniel , Katzka, David A. , Geno, Debra M., Schupack, D , Ravi, Karthik

Neurogastroenterology & Motility | May 24, 2017 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1-9

10.1111/nmo.13105 Get It

AbstractBackgroundAlthough major manometric abnormalities, the significance of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) and hypercontractile esophagus (HE) is poorly understood. We sought to determine long term outcomes for EGJOO and HE.MethodsHigh‐resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) studies conducted from 5/30/2012 to 8/1/2014 consistent with EGJOO and HE and normal studies from 5/30/12 to 11/1/12 were identified. Standardized follow up was conducted with a phone survey utilizing the impact dysphagia questionnaire (IDQ‐10).Key Results56 EGJOO, 40 HE patients and 33 controls were identified. Structural evaluation with EGD and esophagram did not differ among groups. Use of opiates in EGJOO (P<.05) and of anticholinergics in EGJOO and HE patients was more prevalent than in controls (P<.005). Dysphagia was more common in EGJOO (P<.05) and chest pain more common in HE (P<.005) at presentation. While HE patients were more likely to be symptomatic (P<.05), the majority of EGJOO and HE patients overall were asymptomatic at a mean 2.8 years follow up without medical or procedural intervention in the majority (72.5%). Symptom persistence at follow up was predicted by maximum distal contractile integral (DCI) and IRP in both EGJOO and HE (P<.05).Conclusions & InferencesThe majority of patients with EGJOO and HE appear to have a benign clinical course similar to controls in the absence of specific treatment. However, the combination of abnormal IRP and DCI in both HE and EGJOO appears to discriminate an important subset of patients who may benefit from treatment. Further refinement of manometric criteria may therefore provide more useful clinical definitions of EGJOO and HE.