Montaño‐Loza, Aldo J.

Linked ContentThis article is linked to Ebadi et al and Cheng and Wang papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.15029 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.15165.

Linked ContentThis article is linked to Ebadi et al and Imga and Efe papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.15029 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.15075.

SummaryBackgroundVitamin D deficiency has been implicated in the outcome of chronic liver disease.AimTo determine the frequency of severe vitamin D deficiency in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), assess its association with treatment non‐response, and evaluate the relationship between vitamin D status and liver‐related mortality and need for transplantation.MethodsTwo hundred and nine patients were evaluated by liver tissue examination at presentation. Serum vitamin D levels were determined, and serum levels <25 nmol/L (10 ng/mL) were considered severely deficient. Treatment non‐response was defined as non‐normalised aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase and immunoglobulin G levels during conventional immunosuppressive therapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using binary logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsThe mean vitamin D level was 60 ± 38 nmol/L (range, 3‐263 nmol/L), and 42 patients (20%) had severe vitamin D deficiency. Treatment non‐response was more common in patients with severe vitamin D deficiency than in patients without (59% vs 41%, P = 0.04). Severe vitamin D deficiency was also independently associated with a higher risk of developing cirrhosis (HR 3.40; 95% CI 1.30‐8.87, P = 0.01) and liver‐related mortality or requirement for liver transplantation (LT; HR 5.26, 95% CI, 1.54‐18.0, P = 0.008). Patients with persistent severe deficiency following vitamin D supplementation continued to have poor outcomes.ConclusionsSevere vitamin D deficiency is associated with treatment non‐response, progression to cirrhosis, and liver‐related death or need for LT. Severe vitamin D deficiency is a prognostic biomarker in AIH.

Clinical indications for liver transplantation (LT) in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) are identical to those of patients with other chronic liver diseases that end in acute or semiacute liver failure, decompensated cirrhosis, or hepatocellular carcinoma. Recurrent disease after LT has been reported in 10%‐50% of patients with AIH, and the frequency of detection is influenced in part by the use of protocol or clinically indicated liver biopsy. De novo AIH connotes the development of AIH in patients transplanted for liver diseases other than AIH, and it has been reported in 5%‐10% of pediatric and 1%‐2% of adult recipients. Recurrent disease can negatively impact on graft and patient survival, and retransplantation has been required in 8%‐23%. De novo AIH is within the spectrum of graft dysfunction that includes plasma cell–rich rejection, and it can also progress to cirrhosis and graft failure. Treatment for recurrent or de novo disease is based on the conventional regimens for AIH, and corticosteroid therapy alone or combined with azathioprine is standard. Better control of disease activity prior to LT has been associated with less recurrence, and maintenance corticosteroid treatment after LT can reduce its frequency. In conclusion, recurrent AIH is far more frequent than de novo AIH. Both may have negative impacts on graft and patient survival, and early detection and treatment are key objectives. Future investigations must codify the diagnostic criteria for each graft dysfunction, seek diagnostic biomarkers, and evaluate treatments that improve outcomes without increasing the risk of pre‐ and post‐LT infections.

AbstractBackgroundSarcopenia, characterized by low muscle mass, associates with mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Skeletal muscle area in a single computed tomography image at the level of the third lumbar vertebrate (L3) is a valid representative of whole body muscle mass. Controversy remains regarding applicability of psoas muscle to identify patients at greater risk of mortality. We aimed to determine psoas muscle index (PMI) association with skeletal muscle index (SMI) and to evaluate the capacity of PMI to predict liver transplant waitlist mortality.MethodsWe evaluated listed adult patients with cirrhosis from 2012 to 2013 at four North American liver transplant centres. From L3 computed tomography images within 3 months of listing, we determined SMI and PMI expressed by cm2/m2. Low SMI was defined as SMI <39 cm2/m2 in women and <50 cm2/m2 in men as published by us earlier. Cut‐offs for PMI to predict mortality were established using a receiver‐operating characteristic analysis. Mortality predictors were determined using competing‐risk analysis with reported results as subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs).ResultsOf 353 waitlist candidates, 68% were men, mean age 56 ± 9 years, and Model for End‐stage Liver Disease of 16 ± 8 points. Low SMI was present more frequently in men than women (51 vs. 36%, P = 0.02). Moderately strong correlation between SMI and PMI was observed (r > 0.7, P < 0.001). Low PMI (males < 5.1 cm2/m2; females < 4.3 cm2/m2) yielded poor and moderate concordance with low SMI in men and women, respectively (Kappa coefficient 0.31 and 0.63). SMI (39 ± 9 vs. 43 ± 7 cm2/m2; P = 0.009) and PMI (4.4 ± 1.3 vs. 5.2 ± 1.1 cm2/m2; P = 0.001) were lower in women who died and/or were delisted (compared with non‐deceased patients) whereas men who died and/or were delisted had only lower SMI (47 ± 7 vs. 51 ± 9 cm2/m2; P = 0.003), but not PMI compared with non‐deceased patients. In women, both SMI (sHR 0.94, P = 0.048) and PMI (sHR 0.58, P = 0.002) were predictors of mortality, while in men, SMI was significant (sHR 0.95, P = 0.001) and PMI showed a trend to be (sHR 0.85, P = 0.09) associated with mortality. Overall, 104 patients (29%) were misclassified between SMI and PMI categories. Using PMI cut‐offs, 66% and 28% of low SMI men and women, who have a higher risk of mortality, were incorrectly classified as low risk.ConclusionsSkeletal muscle index is a more complete and robust measurement than PMI, especially in men with cirrhosis. Low PMI identifies an incomplete subset of patients at increased risk of mortality indicated by low SMI. Given the poor performance of PMI, SMI should not be substituted by PMI.

Sarcopenia is associated with increased wait‐list mortality, but a standard definition is lacking. In this retrospective study, we sought to determine the optimal definition of sarcopenia in end‐stage liver disease (ESLD) patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT). Included were 396 patients newly listed for LT in 2012 at 5 North American transplant centers. All computed tomography scans were read by 2 individuals with interobserver correlation of 98%. Using image analysis software, the total cross‐sectional area (cm 2 ) of abdominal skeletal muscle at the third lumbar vertebra was measured. The skeletal muscle index (SMI), which normalizes muscle area to patient height, was then calculated. The primary outcome was wait‐list mortality, defined as death on the waiting list or removal from the waiting list for reasons of clinical deterioration. Sex‐specific potential cutoff values to define sarcopenia were determined with a grid search guided by log‐rank test statistics. Optimal search methods identified potential cutoffs to detect survival differences between groups. The overall median SMI was 47.6 cm 2 /m 2 : 50.0 in men and 42.0 in women. At a median of 8.8 months follow‐up, mortality was 25% in men and 36% in women. Patients who died had lower SMI than those who survived (45.6 versus 48.5 cm 2 /m 2 ; P < 0.001), and SMI was associated with wait‐list mortality (hazard ratio, 0.95; P < 0.001). Optimal search method yielded SMI cutoffs of 50 cm 2 /m 2 for men and 39 cm 2 /m 2 for women; these cutoff values best combined statistical significance with a sufficient number of events to detect survival differences between groups. In conclusion, we recommend that an SMI < 50 cm 2 /m 2 for men and < 39 cm 2 /m 2 for women be used to define sarcopenia in patients with ESLD awaiting LT. Liver Transplantation 23 625–633 2017 AASLD .

Summary Background Corticosteroid treatment for autoimmune hepatitis has been shown by randomised controlled clinical trials to ameliorate symptoms, normalise liver tests, improve histological findings and extend survival. Nevertheless, suboptimal responses to corticosteroid treatment still occur. Aim To describe the current definitions, frequencies, clinical relevance and treatment options for suboptimal responses, and to discuss alternative medications that have been used off‐label for these occurrences. Methods Literature search was made for full‐text papers published in English using the keyword ‘autoimmune hepatitis’. Authors' personal experience and investigational studies also helped to identify important contributions to the literature. Results Suboptimal responses to standard therapy include treatment failure (7%), incomplete response (14%), drug toxicity (13%) and relapse after drug withdrawal (50–86%). The probability of a suboptimal response prior to treatment is higher in young patients and in patients with a severe presentation, jaundice, high MELD score at diagnosis, multilobular necrosis or cirrhosis, antibodies to soluble liver antigen, or inability to improve by clinical indices within two weeks or by MELD score within 7 days of conventional corticosteroid treatment. Management strategies have been developed for the adverse responses and nonstandard drugs, including mycophenolate mofetil, budesonide, ciclosporin, tacrolimus, sirolimus and rituximab, are emerging as rescue therapies or alternative frontline agents. Conclusions Once diagnosed, the suboptimal response should be treated by a highly individualised and well‐monitored regimen, preferentially using first‐line therapy. Nonstandard drugs warrant consideration as salvage or second‐line therapies.