Cloft, Harry

Introduction Angio-Seal is a commonly used device for femoral hemostasis in neuroendovascular procedures. This meta-analysis investigates of the safety and efficacy of Angio-Seal in patients undergoing endovascular neurointerventional procedures. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis on all studies evaluating the Angio-Seal device in neurointerventional procedures from inception through 2020 were performed. We studied rates of groin hematoma, retroperitoneal hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, ipsilateral DVT, and ischemic complications. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. Results 13 studies were included in our analysis. 2250 patients with 104 complications were found {4.5% (95% CI, 2.7%–6.3%)}. Of these complications, groin hematoma was the most common with a rate of 2.4% (95% CI, 1.1%–3.6%). Retroperitoneal hematoma {0.3% (95% CI, 0%–0.5%)}, pseudo-aneurysm {0.5% (95% CI, 0.2%–0.8%), and ipsilateral DVT {0.3% (95% CI, 0.1%–0.7%) were also not in negligible rate. The rate of other complications were as follows: vessel occlusion/stenosis; 0.2% (95% CI, 0%–0.4%), vascular surgery; 0.2% (95% CI, 0%–0.5%), and infection; 0.2% (95% CI, 0%–0.5%). One patient died as result of hemorrhagic complications {0.1% (95% CI, 0%–0.3%)}. Use of anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy was found to be positively correlated with high risk of any groin complication and groin hematoma (p ≤ .05). Female gender was associated with high risk of ipsilateral DVT (p ≤ .05). Interestingly, large sheath size was associated with low risk of groin hematoma (p ≤ .05). Conclusion The safety and efficacy rate of Angio-Seal was approximately 95%. The most common complication was groin hematoma. Serious complications including retroperitoneal hematoma and femoral artery occlusion were rare.

OBJECTIVE The impact of FDA approval of flow-diversion technology for the treatment of supraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysms and the publication of the Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study, both of which occurred in 2011, on the utilization of extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypasses is not known. METHODS The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried for hospitalizations for EC-IC bypass performed from 2008 to 2016. Diagnoses of interest included an unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), carotid occlusive disease (COD), and moyamoya disease. The authors assessed trends in EC-IC bypass utilization for these diagnoses and the incidence of adverse discharges, defined as discharge to locations other than home, and the rate of mortality. RESULTS A total of 1640 EC-IC bypass procedures were performed at 558 hospitals during the study period, with 1148 procedures at 448 hospitals performed for a diagnosis of interest. The most frequent surgical indication was moyamoya disease (65.7%, n = 754), followed by COD (23.2%, n = 266), SAH (3.2%, n = 37), and a UIA (7.9%, n = 91). EC-IC bypass utilization for COD decreased from 0.21 per 100 admissions of COD in 2010 to 0.09 per 100 admissions in 2016 (p = 0.023). The frequency of adverse discharges increased during the study period from 22.3% of annual admissions in 2008 to 31.2% in 2016 (p = 0.030) when analysis was limited to procedures performed for a diagnosis of interest. Per volume, the top 5th percentile of hospitals, on average, performed 18.4 procedures (SD 13.2) per hospital during the study period, compared to 1.3 procedures (SD 1.3) that were performed in hospitals within the bottom 95th percentile. The rate of adverse discharges was higher at low-volume institutions when compared to that at high-volume institutions (33.8% vs 28.7%; p = 0.029). Over the study period, the authors noted a trend toward a reduced percentage of total surgical volume performed at high-volume hospitals (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The authors observed a decrease in the utilization of EC-IC bypass for COD during the study period. An increase in the rate of adverse discharges was also noted, coinciding with more procedures being performed at lower-volume centers.

Background Carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCFs) are commonly misdiagnosed on computed tomography angiography (CTA). Purpose This study sought to identify the most sensitive and specific imaging features of CCFs on CTA. Material and Methods A retrospective review identified 18 consecutive patients suspected of having a CCF on CTA and subsequently underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Two blinded reviewers assessed multiple findings on CTA: cavernous sinus asymmetry/enlargement; arterial-phase contrast in the cavernous sinus; proptosis; pre- or post-septal orbital edema; and dilated regional vasculature. Each was graded as positive, possible, and negative; “possible” was counted as positive. A third blinded reviewer served as a tiebreaker. Results Of 18 patients, nine were true-positive and nine were false-positive. Superior ophthalmic vein early enhancement and dilatation had 100.0% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 40.0–100.0) and 77.8% specificity (95% CI 44.4–100.0); arterial-phase contrast in the cavernous sinus had 88.9% sensitivity (95% CI 44.4–100.0) and 66.7% specificity (95% CI 18.5–90.1); peri-orbital edema had 88.9% sensitivity (95% CI 35.5–100.0) and 77.8% specificity (95% CI 22.2–100.0). The most specific markers of CCF were superior petrosal sinus and inferior ophthalmic vein dilatation/enhancement (100.0%, 95% CI 88.8–100.0 and 88.9%, 95% CI 44.4–100.0, respectively); the specificity of asymmetric cavernous enlargement was 44.4% (95% CI 11.1–77.7). Conclusions Among patients in whom a CCF is suspected on CTA, superior ophthalmic vein dilatation/enhancement and arterial-phase contrast within the cavernous sinus are the most sensitive findings. Asymmetric cavernous sinus enlargement has poor specificity and may result in false-positive diagnoses of CCFs. False positive cases were less likely to have an optimally timed contrast bolus.

Background and Purpose— Racial and ethnic disparities in the access to mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) secondary to large vessel occlusion have been previously described. The effect of recent randomized trials validating MT as an effective therapy for AIS secondary to large vessel occlusion on such disparities has not been investigated. Methods— Information on admissions for AIS to endovascular centers occurring between January 2016 and September 2018 was obtained from a national database. The number of patients receiving IV-tPA (intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator) and MT at each institution was determined, and patient demographics were characterized according to age, sex, race/ethnicity, and insurance status. Comparisons of patients who did and did not undergo MT and between patients of different racial and ethnic backgrounds were performed. Demographic variables independently associated with the utilization of MT were identified using multivariate linear regression analysis. Results— There were 206 853 admissions to 173 endovascular centers during the time period of interest. The overall utilization of MT was 8.4%. The utilization of MT for black/Hispanic patients was lower than that among white/non-Hispanic patients (7.0% versus 9.8%; P <0.001). Black/Hispanic patients were also less likely to receive IV-tPA (16.2% versus 20.5%; P <0.001) and to be admitted to the endovascular center after transfer from a different hospital (20.0% versus 30.1%; P <0.001). On multivariate linear regression analysis, increasing institutional proportions of patients with female sex (β=−0.601; P <0.001), insurance with Medicaid or uninsured status (β=−0.153; P =0.029), and black/Hispanic race/ethnicity (β=−0.062; P =0.046) were independently associated with lower institutional utilization of MT. Conclusions— Despite the mainstream acceptance of MT for the treatment of AIS secondary to large vessel occlusion, racial and ethnic disparities in the utilization of MT persist.

Abstract While revascularization of the acutely or chronically occluded internal carotid artery has become commonplace with modern endovascular techniques, revascularization of an acutely occluded common carotid artery (CCA) is a controversial procedure with unique challenges. These challenges can be related to the lack of observable markers for identifying vessels during navigation or for identifying the exact location and extent of occlusion within the CCA, in addition to wide-ranging treatment risks. In this video, we illustrate the controversial revascularization of a 68-yr-old woman with an acute CCA occlusion who presented with fluctuating neurological symptoms. We believed treatment to be indicated by the lack of adequate collaterals on the intracranial CTA, and fluctuating symptoms in the absence of an intracranial major vessel occlusion, suggesting that the CCA occlusion was exerting important hemodynamic effects and at risk of causing a major stroke without revascularization, despite a low initial NIH stroke score. Though acute recanalization of patients with low NIH stroke score with stent-angioplasty is a controversial procedure, we believed it to be necessary in the case of our patient and believe it will likely be the focus of the next wave of large clinical trials dedicated to acute stroke.

Background Patients with an acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion often require transfer to an endovascular center for treatment. Objective To assess the effect of hospital transfer on outcomes after endovascular revascularization. Methods Outcomes of endovascular revascularization were compared between directly admitted and transferred patients using data from a national database and our own institution. Results 118 institutions within the database reported outcomes of 8533 inpatient admissions for endovascular treatment of AIS. Mortality rate (14.9% vs 18.6%; p=0.049) and mortality index (1.1 vs 1.6; p=0.048) were significantly lower among directly admitted patients than among transferred patients. Within our institutional cohort of 140 patients who underwent endovascular therapy, directly admitted patients had a significantly faster time to revascularization than transferred patients (277.4 vs 420.4 min; p≤0.0001). Among transferred patients, an increasing distance of transferred hospital to our home institution was associated with an increasing risk of mortality (unit OR=1.26, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.54; p=0.0061). Conclusions Outcomes of revascularization may improve with methods to identify patients with large vessel occlusion before hospital admission, thus increasing the likelihood of initial triage to a comprehensive stroke center for patients eligible for endovascular intervention.