Back to Authors

Kummar, Shivaani

0000-0001-6906-1627

Mayo Clinic

Oregon Health & Science University

Citations 13

A phase 2 study of vorinostat in locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma
Gonçalves, Priscila , Heilbrun, Lance K. , Barrett, Michael T. , Hansen, Aaron R. , Sukari, Ammar , Smith, Daryn , Casetta, Lindsay, Boerner, Scott A. , Chen, Alice P. , Lenkiewicz, Elizabeth, Malasi, Smriti, LoRusso, Patricia , Kummar, Shivaani , Siu, Lillian L. , Piekarz, Richard , Chao, Joseph , Pilat, Mary Jo , Hansen, Aaron R

Oncotarget | March 22, 2017 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 20 | Pages: 32918-32929

10.18632/oncotarget.16464 Get It

Biologic and clinical characteristics of adolescent and young adult cancers: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, and sarcoma
Tricoli, James V. , Blair, Donald G., Anders, Carey K. , Bleyer, W. Archie, Boardman, Lisa A., Khan, Javed , Hayes‐Lattin, Brandon , Merchant, Melinda S., Seibel, Nita L. , Thurin, Magdalena , Boardman, Lisa A., Kummar, Shivaani , Hunger, Stephen P. , Willman, Cheryl L.

Cancer | February 5, 2016 | Volume: 122 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1017-1028

10.1002/cncr.29871 Get It

Adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer have not attained the same improvements in overall survival as either younger children or older adults. One possible reason for this disparity may be that the AYA cancers exhibit unique biologic characteristics, resulting in differences in clinical and treatment resistance behaviors. This report from the biologic component of the jointly sponsored National Cancer Institute and LiveStrong Foundation workshop entitled “Next Steps in Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology” summarizes the current status of biologic and translational research progress for 5 AYA cancers; colorectal cancer breast cancer, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, melanoma, and sarcoma. Conclusions from this meeting included the need for basic biologic, genomic, and model development for AYA cancers as well as translational research studies to elucidate any fundamental differences between pediatric, AYA, and adult cancers. The biologic questions for future research are whether there are mutational or signaling pathway differences (for example, between adult and AYA colorectal cancer) that can be clinically exploited to develop novel therapies for treating AYA cancers and to develop companion diagnostics. Cancer 2016;122:1017–1028. © 2016 American Cancer Society
Phase I Study of PARP Inhibitor ABT-888 in Combination with Topotecan in Adults with Refractory Solid Tumors and Lymphomas
Chen, Alice P. , Ji, Jiuping , Zhang, Yiping , Ames, Matthew M. , Jia, Lee , Weil, Marcie, Speranza, Giovanna, Murgo, Anthony J., Kinders, Robert J. , Wang, Lihua , Parchment, Ralph E. , Carter, John , Stotler, Howard, Rubinstein, Larry , Hollingshead, Melinda G. , Melillo, Giovanni, Bonner, William, Tomaszewski, Joseph E. , Doroshow, James H. , Kummar, Shivaani , Reid, Joel M. , Pommier, Yves G. , Rubinstein, Larry V

Cancer Research | July 28, 2011 | Volume: 71 | Issue: 17 | Pages: 5626-5634

10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-1227 Get It

Abstract A phase I trial of ABT-888 (veliparib), a PARP inhibitor, in combination with topotecan, a topoisomerase I–targeted agent, was carried out to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the combination in patients with refractory solid tumors and lymphomas. Varying schedules and doses of intravenous topotecan in combination with ABT-888 (10 mg) administered orally twice a day (BID) were evaluated. Plasma and urine pharmacokinetics were assessed and levels of poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) and the DNA damage marker γH2AX were measured in tumor and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Twenty-four patients were enrolled. Significant myelosuppression limited the ability to coadminister ABT-888 with standard doses of topotecan, necessitating dose reductions. Preclinical studies using athymic mice carrying human tumor xenografts also informed schedule changes. The MTD was established as topotecan 0.6 mg/m2/d and ABT-888 10 mg BID on days one to five of 21-day cycles. Topotecan did not alter the pharmacokinetics of ABT-888. A more than 75% reduction in PAR levels was observed in 3 paired tumor biopsy samples; a greater than 50% reduction was observed in PBMCs from 19 of 23 patients with measurable levels. Increases in γH2AX response in circulating tumor cells (CTC) and PBMCs were observed in patients receiving ABT-888 with topotecan. We show a mechanistic interaction of a PARP inhibitor, ABT-888, with a topoisomerase I inhibitor, topotecan, in PBMCs, tumor, and CTCs. Results of this trial reveal that PARP inhibition can modulate the capacity to repair topoisomerase I–mediated DNA damage in the clinic. Cancer Res; 71(17); 5626–34. ©2011 AACR.