Sethi, Sanjeev

ABSTRACT Background and hypothesis The MENTOR trial (MEmbranous Nephropathy Trial Of Rituximab) showed that rituximab was noninferior to cyclosporine in inducing complete or partial remission of proteinuria and was superior in maintaining proteinuria remission. However, the cost of rituximab may prohibit first-line use for some patients and health-care payers. Methods A Markov model was used to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of rituximab compared with cyclosporine for the treatment membranous nephropathy from the perspective of a health-care payer with a lifetime time horizon. The model was informed by data from the MENTOR trial where possible; additional parameters including cost and utility inputs were obtained from the literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of reduced-cost biosimilar rituximab. Results Rituximab for the treatment of membranous nephropathy was cost effective (assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained; in $US 2021) compared with cyclosporine, with an ICER of $8373/QALY over a lifetime time horizon. The incremental cost of rituximab therapy was $28 007 with an additional 3.34 QALYs compared with cyclosporine. Lower cost of rituximab biosimilars resulted in a more favorable ICER, and in some cases resulted in rituximab being dominant (lower cost and great benefit) compared to cyclosporine. Conclusions Despite the greater cost of rituximab, it may be a cost-effective option for the treatment of membranous nephropathy when compared with cyclosporine. The cost-effectiveness of rituximab is further improved with the use of less expensive biosimilars.

ABSTRACT Membranous nephropathy (MN) is characterized by deposition of immune complexes leading to thickening of glomerular basement membranes. Over time, the understanding of MN has evolved, with the identification of specific autoantibodies against novel podocyte antigens and the unraveling of intricate pathogenic pathways. Although the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab is favored as part of the initial therapy in MN, a subgroup of MN patients may be resistant to rituximab necessitating the use of alternative agents such as cytotoxic therapies. In addition, newer agents such as novel anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, therapies targeting the CD38-positive plasma cells and anti-complement therapy are being studied in patients who are resistant to traditional treatment strategies. This manuscript furnishes a review of the novel developments in the pathophysiology of MN including the identification of target antigens and current treatment standards for MN, concentrating on evidenced-based interventions designed to attain remission and to prevent disease progression.

ABSTRACT Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. MN is characterized by subepithelial accumulation of immune complexes along the glomerular basement membrane. The immune complexes are composed of immunoglobulin G and a target antigen. PLA2R is the target antigen in approximately 60% of MN cases, and MN is traditionally classified as PLA2R-positive or PLA2R-negative MN. Over the last 7 years, additional target antigens have been identified, which have specific disease associations, distinctive clinical and pathologic findings, and therapeutic implications. The newly discovered target antigens include NELL1, EXT1/EXT2, NCAM1, SEMA3B, PCDH7, FAT1, CNTN1, NTNG1, PCSK6 and NDNF. To group all these antigens into a generic ‘PLA2R-negative’ MN group is imprecise and un-informative. We propose a logical approach for detection of the target antigen which includes (i) currently available serology-based testing to detect anti-PLA2R and anti-THSD7A antibodies; and (ii) kidney biopsy testing to detect the target antigens. Determination of the antigen on kidney biopsy can be done by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence studies. Alternatively, laser capture microdissection (LCM) of glomeruli followed by mass spectrometry (MS) can be used to identify a target antigen. LCM/MS has the advantage of being a one-stop test and is particularly useful for detection of rare target antigens. At the current time, while it is possible to detect the newer antigens by immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence/LCM/MS, serology-based tests to detect serum antibodies to the new antigens are not yet available. It is critical that serology-based tests should be developed not just for accurate diagnosis, but as a guide for treatment. We review the current methodology and propose an algorithm for diagnosis and detection of target antigens in MN that may shape the current practice in the future. Membranous nephropathy (MN) results from accumulation of subepithelial immune complexes along the glomerular basement membrane.PLA2R is the most common target antigen, but newly discovered target antigens have filled the void of PLA2R-negative MN.MN associated with the newly discovered target antigens have distinctive clinical and pathologic findings, treatment and prognostic implications. These include NELL1, EXT1/EXT2, NCAM1, PCDH7, SEMA3B, CNTN1, FAT1, NDNF and PCSK6.Immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence methodology is currently in use for detecting target antigens in kidney biopsy tissue, although we anticipate laser capture microdissection of glomeruli followed by mass spectrometry will become available soon.Serologic testing is currently available for only detecting antibodies to PLA2R and THSD7A. It is critical that serologic tests become available for detecting antibodies to the newly discovered antigens.

Laser capture microdissection and mass spectrometry (LCM/MS) is a technique that involves dissection of glomeruli from paraffin-embedded biopsy tissue, followed by digestion of the dissected glomerular proteins by trypsin, and subsequently mass spectrometry to identify and semiquantitate the glomerular proteins. LCM/MS has played a crucial role in the identification of novel types of amyloidosis, biomarker discovery in fibrillary GN, and more recently discovery of novel target antigens in membranous nephropathy (MN). In addition, LCM/MS has also confirmed the role for complement proteins in glomerular diseases, including C3 glomerulopathy. LCM/MS is now widely used as a clinical test and considered the gold standard for diagnosis and typing amyloidosis. For the remaining glomerular diseases, LCM/MS has remained a research tool. In this review, we discuss the usefulness of LCM/MS in other glomerular diseases, particularly MN, deposition diseases, and diseases of complement pathways, and advocate more routine use of LCM/MS at the present time in at least certain diseases, such as MN, for target antigen detection. We also discuss the limitations of LCM/MS, particularly the difficulties faced from moving from a research-based technique to a clinical test. Nonetheless, the role of LCM/MS in glomerular diseases is expanding. Currently, LCM/MS may be used to identify the etiology in certain glomerular diseases, but in the future, LCM/MS can play a valuable role in determining pathways of complement activation, inflammation, and fibrosis.

Abstract Background and Aims A significant number of patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV) with glomerulonephritis (AAV-GN) still progress to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD, eGFR<15mL/min/1.73m2) despite advances in remission-induction treatment. Method A retrospective cohort study on MPO- or PR3-ANCA positive patients with AAV (MPA or GPA) and ESKD at presentation. Renal recovery, dialysis discontinuation and maintenance in ESKD after standard remission-induction, with or without the use of PLEX were compared. Results We analyzed 166 patients with biopsy proven active kidney involvement and eGFR <15mL/min/1.73m2 at the time of AAV-GN diagnosis. Patients received glucocorticoids with CYC (n = 84) or with RTX (n = 72) for remission-induction, and 49 also received PLEX. The predictors for renal recovery were erythrocyte sedimentation rate, SCr at diagnosis and minimal or mild chronicity changes. We analyzed 71 patients who started dialysis with or without PLEX within 4 weeks from AAV-GN diagnosis. The predictors for dialysis discontinuation were minimal chronicity changes in kidney biopsy at the time of diagnosis (OR 6.138, [95%CI 1.389-27.118],p = 0.017) and focal glomerular involvement (OR 5.017,[95%CI 1.287-19.567],p = 0.020). Predictors for maintenance in ESKD at 12 months included higher serum creatinine (SCr) at the time of diagnosis (IRR 1.086, [95%CI 1.005-1.173],p = 0.037), moderate (IRR 3.797,[95%CI 1.090-13.225],p = 0.036), or severe chronicity changes in kidney biopsy (IRR 5.883,[95%CI 1.542–22.439],p = 0.009). Conclusion In our cohort, kidney recovery, dialysis discontinuation, and maintenance of ESKD in patients with AAV-GN and eGFR<15mL/min/1.73m2 depended on SCr and histologic findings on kidney biopsies at the time of diagnosis and was not affected by the addition of PLEX.