Kmieciak, Maciej

Abstract Tumor dormancy remains a major hurdle in the treatment of cancers. Recently, the association between cancer stem cells (CSC) and tumor dormancy has been speculated in variety of cancers. Despite conventional therapies of breast cancer, most of the US deaths are attributed to relapse which is likely due to a failure of current treatment regimens to eliminate breast cancer stem cells (BCSC). We reported IFN-γ-induced HER-2/neu antigen loss and tumor relapse. We performed in vitro and in vivo studies using neu positive mammary carcinoma (MMC) tumors and their dominant negative (dn) IFN-γ Rα MMC sub-line. We showed that IFN-γ producing CD8+ T cells induced the de novo generation of a distinct BCSC variant that differed from conventional BCSC. The novel phenotype: i) is not intrinsically quiescent, ii) is reversible by blocking IFN-γ Rα signaling in the tumor, iii) upregulates serine protease inhibitors (SPI-6/PI-9) and MUC-1 that could render the tumors refractory to granzyme/perforin- and antibody-induced apoptosis, respectively, and iv) downregulates HER-2/neu expression upon emerging under the immune pressure. While HER-2/neu+ conventional BCSC have been shown to be sensitive to HER-2/neu-targeted immunotherapy, these novel BCSC-like phenotypes are refractory to such immunotherapy because of HER-2/neu loss. Identification of such tumor immunoediting pathways and mechanisms is expected to improve immunotherapy of breast cancer, by pathway blocking strategies.

Abstract Purpose: This phase I study was conducted to identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of alvocidib when combined with vorinostat in patients with relapsed, refractory, or poor prognosis acute leukemia, or refractory anemia with excess blasts-2. Secondary objectives included investigating the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of the combination. Experimental Design: Patients received vorinostat (200 mg orally, three times a day, for 14 days) on a 21-day cycle, combined with 2 different alvocidib administration schedules: a 1-hour intravenous infusion, daily × 5; or a 30-minute loading infusion followed by a 4-hour maintenance infusion, weekly × 2. The alvocidib dose was escalated using a standard 3+3 design. Results: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled and treated. The alvocidib MTD was 20 mg/m2 (30-minute loading infusion) followed by 20 mg/m2 (4-hour maintenance infusion) on days one and eight, in combination with vorinostat. The most frequently encountered toxicities were cytopenias, fatigue, hyperglycemia, hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia, and QT prolongation. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were cardiac arrhythmia-atrial fibrillation and QT prolongation. No objective responses were achieved although 13 of 26 evaluable patients exhibited stable disease. Alvocidib seemed to alter vorinostat pharmacokinetics, whereas alvocidib pharmacokinetics were unaffected by vorinostat. Ex vivo exposure of leukemia cells to plasma obtained from patients after alvocidib treatment blocked vorinostat-mediated p21CIP1 induction and downregulated Mcl-1 and p-RNA Pol II for some specimens, although parallel in vivo bone marrow responses were infrequent. Conclusions: Alvocidib combined with vorinostat is well tolerated. Although disease stabilization occurred in some heavily pretreated patients, objective responses were not obtained with these schedules. Clin Cancer Res; 19(7); 1873–83. ©2013 AACR.

Abstract We have previously shown T-cell–mediated rejection of the neu-overexpressing mammary carcinoma cells (MMC) in wild-type FVB mice. However, following rejection of primary tumors, a fraction of animals experienced a recurrence of a neu antigen-negative variant (ANV) of MMC (tumor evasion model) after a long latency period. In the present study, we determined that T cells derived from wild-type FVB mice can specifically recognize MMC by secreting IFN-γ and can induce apoptosis of MMC in vitro. Neu transgenic (FVBN202) mice develop spontaneous tumors and cannot reject it (tumor tolerance model). To dissect the mechanisms associated with rejection or tolerance of MMC tumors, we compared transcriptional patterns within the tumor microenvironment of MMC undergoing rejection with those that resisted it either because of tumor evasion/antigen loss recurrence (ANV tumors) or because of intrinsic tolerance mechanisms displayed by the transgenic mice. Gene profiling confirmed that immune rejection is primarily mediated through activation of IFN-stimulated genes and T-cell effector mechanisms. The tumor evasion model showed combined activation of Th1 and Th2 with a deviation toward Th2 and humoral immune responses that failed to achieve rejection likely because of lack of target antigen. Interestingly, the tumor tolerance model instead displayed immune suppression pathways through activation of regulatory mechanisms that included in particular the overexpression of interleukin-10 (IL-10), IL-10 receptor, and suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS)-1 and SOCS-3. These data provide a road map for the identification of novel biomarkers of immune responsiveness in clinical trials. [Cancer Res 2008;68(7):2436–46]