Back to Authors

Campian, Jian

Mayo Clinic

WinnMed

Citations 2

Comparative Dosing of Bevacizumab for Radiation Necrosis: Impact of Tumor Type on Edema Response
Schultz, Sydney E., Labib, Milisia, Breit, Jeff, Barreto, Jasón, Mead‐Harvey, Carolyn , Behairy, Mohamad, Nurioglu, Aylin, White, Jessica, Valerius, Allison , Taraba, Jodi L. , Soefje, Scott, Hoefs, Gena, Caron, Samantha, Ruff, Deborah, Uhm, Joon, Lachance, Daniel, Kizilbash, Dr Sani, Campian, Jian, Geyer, Susan, Neth, Bryan, Sener, Ugur, Schultz, Sydney , Barreto, Jason N. , Behair, Mohamad, White, Jessica B. , Karbhari, Nishika , Taraba, Jodi L , Soefje, Scott A. , Hoefs, Gena E, Caron, Samantha, Ruff, Michael W. , Uhm, Joon H. , Lachance, Daniel Honore , Kizilbash, Sani H. , Campian, Jian , Geyer, Susan M. , Neth, Bryan J. , Sener, Uğur

No container title available | September 4, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-10795946/v1 Get It

Abstract Purpose Bevacizumab is an effective treatment for radiation necrosis; dose dependent radiographic and edema response data are lacking. Methods Multicenter, retrospective cohort study of adult patients with primary central nervous system tumors or brain metastases who received bevacizumab for radiation necrosis between June 2021 and July 2024. Patients were grouped by bevacizumab dose (7.5 mg/kg vs 10 mg/kg administered every three weeks). Primary outcome was edema response, assessed by a blinded neuro-oncologist. Secondary outcomes included contrast enhancing disease response, clinical response, adverse events, treatment discontinuation, and re-dosing for recurrent radiation necrosis. Analyses were performed with and without adjustment for tumor type. Results 104 patients were included (7.5 mg/kg, n = 53; 10 mg/kg, n = 51). Edema response differed between dosing groups in unadjusted analyses (p = 0.032), favoring the 7.5 mg/kg cohort; however, this association was attenuated after adjustment for tumor type. Contrast enhancing disease response did not differ between groups in either unadjusted or adjusted analyses (p = 0.43). Clinical response was higher in the 7.5 mg/kg group (65.2% vs 37.8%, p = 0.013). Tumor type differed significantly between cohorts (p < 0.001), with more primary CNS tumors in the 10 mg/kg group. Rates of adverse events, treatment discontinuation, and re-dosing were similar. Conclusions While lower-dose bevacizumab was associated with greater edema reduction in unadjusted analyses, this effect was attenuated after accounting for tumor type. Importantly, 7.5 mg/kg dosing appeared sufficient for achieving edema control and contrast enhancing disease response. These findings support an individualized approach to bevacizumab dosing in radiation necrosis and highlight the need for prospective, tumor-stratified studies.
Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in patients treated for glioma before or during pregnancy: a single-institution series
Valerius, Allison R. , Strathman, Annabella, Rodriguez, Andrew , Sener, Ugur, Uhm, Joon, Lachance, Daniel, Neth, Bryan J., Campian, Jian, Meyer, Fredric B, Laack, Nadia, Decker, Paul, Ruff, Michael W. , Valerius, Allison , Strathman, Annabella R. , Sener, Uğur , Uhm, Joon H. , Campian, Jian L , Burns, Terry C. , Parney, Ian F.

No container title available | July 31, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-10488311/v1 Get It

Abstract Background: Glioma diagnosed during pregnancy and pregnancy following glioma treatment present complex management challenges. The safety of glioma treatment during pregnancy is not well established. The ability to counsel patients on timing of conception after treatment remains limited. The aim of this study was to review our institution’s experience with glioma during and before pregnancy. Methods: In this single-institution study, we retrospectively identified patients diagnosed with glioma during or prior to pregnancy and reviewed treatment course and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Results: Twenty-one female patients were included in our study. Glioma diagnoses included 12 high-grade tumors and 9 low-grade tumors. Cohort A consisted of 8 patients who presented with glioma during pregnancy, of which, 7 underwent glioma treatment during pregnancy. All pregnancies in cohort A were without significant maternal complications and resulted in delivery of a healthy neonate. Cohort B consisted of 13 patients who experienced pregnancy after a prior diagnosis of glioma, totaling 23 pregnancies. Antepartum course was complicated by seizure in three pregnancies. Functionally inconsequential anatomic abnormalities in childhood offspring of cohort B occurred in 5 (27.8%) of the pregnancies. Four of the offspring with anatomic abnormalities had exposure to TMZ prior to conception. Conclusions: In this retrospective series, diagnosis of glioma before or during pregnancy was associated with generally favorable maternal, fetal and childhood outcomes. We observed a higher-than-expected rate of anatomic abnormalities in the post-diagnosis cohort, though none carried meaningful functional consequences. These findings add to the limited literature exploring maternal and fetal outcomes in patients with glioma.