Ruff, Deborah

Abstract Purpose Bevacizumab is an effective treatment for radiation necrosis; dose dependent radiographic and edema response data are lacking. Methods Multicenter, retrospective cohort study of adult patients with primary central nervous system tumors or brain metastases who received bevacizumab for radiation necrosis between June 2021 and July 2024. Patients were grouped by bevacizumab dose (7.5 mg/kg vs 10 mg/kg administered every three weeks). Primary outcome was edema response, assessed by a blinded neuro-oncologist. Secondary outcomes included contrast enhancing disease response, clinical response, adverse events, treatment discontinuation, and re-dosing for recurrent radiation necrosis. Analyses were performed with and without adjustment for tumor type. Results 104 patients were included (7.5 mg/kg, n = 53; 10 mg/kg, n = 51). Edema response differed between dosing groups in unadjusted analyses (p = 0.032), favoring the 7.5 mg/kg cohort; however, this association was attenuated after adjustment for tumor type. Contrast enhancing disease response did not differ between groups in either unadjusted or adjusted analyses (p = 0.43). Clinical response was higher in the 7.5 mg/kg group (65.2% vs 37.8%, p = 0.013). Tumor type differed significantly between cohorts (p < 0.001), with more primary CNS tumors in the 10 mg/kg group. Rates of adverse events, treatment discontinuation, and re-dosing were similar. Conclusions While lower-dose bevacizumab was associated with greater edema reduction in unadjusted analyses, this effect was attenuated after accounting for tumor type. Importantly, 7.5 mg/kg dosing appeared sufficient for achieving edema control and contrast enhancing disease response. These findings support an individualized approach to bevacizumab dosing in radiation necrosis and highlight the need for prospective, tumor-stratified studies.

Abstract AIMS Methods for disease monitoring in glioma are currently limited. Liquid biopsies are of increasing interest within the field but have been challenging due to the blood-brain barrier. To bypass this challenge, we aimed to assess the technical and clinical feasibility of obtaining intracranial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for disease monitoring via cell-free DNA (cfDNA). METHOD Adults with gliomas were recruited for longitudinal intracranial CSF collection via CSF access devices, including Ommaya reservoirs in four patients and an existing VP shunt in one patient. cfDNA was then extracted and analyzed using two sequencing platforms, PredicineCARE for cancer variant profiling and PredicineSCORE for low-pass whole genome sequencing (LP-WGS). This analysis generated genomic aberration profiles and genome wide copy number burden (CNB) score. RESULTS Across five patients, thirty-five CSF samples were obtained (median volume: 3.80 mL; 0.5-5 mL), with 30 samples (85.7%) yielding sufficient cfDNA. Tumor fraction increased by 6.28x and 2.87x in two patients with radiographic disease progression and decreased by 0.08x and 0.04x in another two after chemoradiation. In another patient with pseudoprogression, tumor fraction decreased from 0.26 after resection to unmeasurable levels. Patient specific tumor-associated variant allelic frequencies (VAFs), including TP53, PTEN, and TERT, decreased within individual patients after resection and chemoradiation. In two patients with IDH-mutant gliomas, IDH1 VAF after resection correlated with decreased CSF D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG) levels (0.64x and 0.62x, respectively, for the first patient, and 0.01x and 0.07x for the other patient). Both IDH1 VAF and D-2-HG increased in a patient with radiographic progression (2.56x and 9.21x, respectively). CNB decreased below the limit of quantification during treatment and increased above the limit at progression. CONCLUSION Longitudinal CSF cfDNA can feasibly be obtained via CSF access devices in patients with gliomas during their disease course. Further sample collection and analysis are ongoing to determine the thresholds of change indicative of treatment response and progression.