Final results of RTOG 0246: A phase II study of selective surgical resection for locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer treated with a paclitaxel-based chemoradiation regimen.
7 Background: The organ preserving strategy of selective esophageal resection after definitive chemoradiation was evaluated in a multi-center, prospective Phase II trial. Methods: Treatment involved induction chemotherapy with 5-FU (650 mg/mg2/d), cisplatin (15 mg/mg2/d) and paclitaxel (200 mg/mg2/d) for 2 cycles followed by concurrent chemoradiation with 50.4 Gy (1.8 Gy/fx) and daily 5-FU (300 mg/mg2/d) with cisplatin (15 mg/mg2/d) over the first 5 days. Following definitive chemoradiation, pts were evaluated for residual locoregional disease with chest and abdominal CT scans, EUS and optional PET scans. If there was no suspected residual disease patients were observed and monitored serially for recurrent disease at 3 mos x 2, 6 mos x 3 and then yrly. Esophageal resection was considered only for pts with suspected residual or recurrent locoregional esophageal cancer that did not have systemic disease. Results: 43 pts from Sept 2003 to March 2006 with non-metastatic resectable esophageal cancer were entered from 19 sites to RTOG 0246. 41 pts were eligible for analysis. 29 pts (73%) were adenocarcinoma histology with pretreatment clinical stage T3 or greater in 31 pts (76%) and N1 in 29 pts (71%). Following induction chemotherapy and chemoradiation 3 pts (7.3%) died of treatment related deaths and 1 pt died of disease progression. 21 pts (51%) underwent surgical resection following chemoradiation because of suspected residual disease 17 pts (41%), pt choice (1) or recurrent locoregional disease 3 pts (7%). 1 pt died postoperatively from esophageal anastomotic leak. 11 pts (27%) are alive and free of disease 70 to 90 months after chemoradiation, of which 5 (12%) did not have esophagectomy. With a median follow-up of 6.7 yrs (for 16 alive pts), the estimated overall 2.5 and 5-year survival rates (95% CI) are 46.3% (30.7%-60.6%) and 36.6% (22.3%-51.0%). Conclusions: The long-term results from this multi-center, prospective Phase II trial demonstrates the efficacy of a selective surgical resection approach following definitive chemoradiation in a predominantly adenocarcinoma population of locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT00081289.
HER2 testing in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) using parallel tissue-based methods.
2 Background: Testing for HER2 in EAC has become routine given its ability to predict benefit from HER2-targeted therapy. HER2 protein analysis by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is more rapid and generally less expensive than assessment of gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). However, the accuracy of IHC for predicting HER2 amplification has not been examined in a large EAC cohort. Methods: Surgical EAC specimens were examined from 675 patients who underwent curative resection at a single institution without preoperative therapy. Tumors were located in the esophagus (47%) or gastroesophageal junction (53%); most were node-positive (73%). Every tumor was evaluated by IHC in parallel with FISH in a blinded manner using FDA-approved assays. A consensus IHC score was determined by 2 pathologists using tumor-specific criteria (negative, 0 or 1+; equivocal, 2+; positive, 3+). Gene amplification by FISH was defined as a HER2/CEP17ratio ≥ 2. Results: HER2 amplification was detected in 89% of IHC 3+ cases, 13% of IHC 2+ cases, and 4% of IHC 0-1+ cases (Table). Accordingly, using FISH as the reference standard, the positive predictive value (PPV) of a positive IHC test (3+) was 89% (79/89 [95% CI 82%-95%]), and the negative predictive value of a negative IHC test (0-1+) was 96% (401/417 [94%-98%]). Importantly, the PPV of an equivocal IHC score (2+) for detecting HER2 amplification was 13% (22/169 [8%-18%]). Conclusions: In the largest study to date comparing HER2 testing methods in EAC, a negative IHC result (0 or 1+) nearly excludes the presence of gene amplification by FISH. Whereas a positive IHC result (3+) strongly predicts for the presence of amplification, an equivocal IHC result (2+) is a weak predictor. These findings in EAC support a HER2 testing algorithm where IHC is used for initial screening and FISH testing is restricted to cases with equivocal IHC results. [Table: see text]
Central nervous system relapse in patients with untreated HER2‐positive esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma
Although HER2‐positive breast cancers demonstrate a propensity for central nervous system (CNS) metastasis, it is unknown whether other HER2‐positive tumors, including adenocarcinomas of the esophagus/gastroesophageal junction (EAC), share this characteristic. Insight into this association may inform the development of HER2‐targeted therapies that penetrate the blood‐brain barrier. We examined HER2 overexpression and gene amplification in 708 patients with EAC who underwent curative‐intent surgery during a time period (1980–1997) when no patient received HER2‐targeted therapy. We identified patients whose site of first cancer recurrence was CNS and those who had a CNS relapse at any time. After a median follow‐up of 61.2 months, 3.4% (24/708) of patients developed CNS relapse (all involved the brain). Patients with HER2‐positive (vs ‐negative) primary tumors showed a higher 5‐year cumulative incidence of CNS relapse as first recurrence (5.8% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.0058) and at any time (8.3% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.0062). In a multivariable model that included covariates previously associated with HER2 or with CNS relapse in breast cancer, HER2 positivity was the only variable that was statistically significantly associated with shorter time to CNS relapse as first recurrence (p = 0.0026) or at any time (hazard ratio 4.3 [95% confidence interval 1.8 to 10.3]; p = 0.001). These are the first data in a non‐breast cancer to demonstrate an association between HER2 positivity and higher CNS relapse risk after surgery, and suggest that HER2‐positive EACs have a predilection for CNS metastases.
Context Several immunohistochemical markers are available to establish the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Judicious selection is essential to achieve a reliable diagnosis in limited tissue provided by liver biopsy. Objective To compare the efficacy of 5 hepatocellular markers for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma across various levels of differentiations. Design Immunohistochemistry for hepatocyte paraffin antigen 1 (Hep Par 1), polyclonal carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), glypican-3, arginase-1, and bile salt export pump transporter was performed in 79 hepatocellular carcinomas, yielding 93 observations (13 well-differentiated [14%], 41 moderately differentiated [44%], and 39 poorly differentiated [42%] tumors). Results Arginase-1 and Hep Par 1 had the highest sensitivity for well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma, whereas arginase-1 and glypican-3 had the highest sensitivity for poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. When staining of more than 50% of the tumor was considered a positive result, arginase-1 remained the most sensitive marker for all differentiations, whereas sensitivity for Hep Par 1 in poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma dropped to 30% and that of glypican-3 in well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma was 15%. The addition of Hep Par 1 and/or polyclonal CEA to arginase-1 did not lead to an increase in sensitivity for any differentiation. The combined use of arginase-1 and glypican-3 yielded 100% sensitivity for poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusion Arginase-1 was the most sensitive marker in all differentiations of hepatocellular carcinoma. Glypican-3 had high sensitivity for poorly differentiated cases and its combined use with arginase-1 enabled identification of nearly all cases of poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. Although bile salt export pump transporter has good overall sensitivity, it has a limited role in establishing hepatocellular differentiation when added to a panel of arginase-1 with either glypican-3 or Hep Par 1.
HER‐2/neu gene amplification in relation to expression of HER2 and HER3 proteins in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma
AbstractBackground and AimHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major complication of cirrhosis and has been increasing in incidence in recent years. Fatty liver disease is an increasingly common cause of chronic liver disease, and there have been several case reports of HCC in patients with non‐cirrhotic fatty liver disease. However, there is limited data from systematic studies with histological confirmation of the presence of both the HCC and the non‐cirrhotic fatty liver disease.MethodsWe studied the occurrence of fatty liver disease and the associated demographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics of a large cohort of patients with HCC in non‐cirrhotic livers. Patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CC) occurring in non‐cirrhotic livers and diagnosed during the same time period were used as the comparison group.ResultsSignificant steatosis in the nontumor liver had a statistically significant association with HCC, being present in 54% (85/157) of HCC compared with 27% (32/120) of CC (P < 0.0001). Steatohepatitis was present in 15% (24/157) of HCC and 1% (2/120) of CC (P = 0.0014). Furthermore, HCC was more prevalent in cases with higher grades of steatosis. In addition, the recently described intratumoral steatohepatitic morphology of HCC (SH‐HCC) was also associated with significant steatosis in nontumor liver, with significant steatosis being present in 89% with SH‐HCC compared with 50% without SH‐HCC (P = 0.0162). Finally, SH‐HCC was increasingly more prevalent in patients with higher grades of nontumor steatosis.ConclusionsTaken together, these findings suggest a strong association between fatty liver disease and HCC in non‐cirrhotic livers.
Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma Arising in an Esophageal Polyp: A Case Report
Liposarcoma is one of the most common sarcomas in adults, but only rarely presents as an esophageal primary. There have been several reports of well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDL) arising in the esophagus, but we present a case of dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DL) presenting as a large esophageal polyp. We believe this is the first reported case of DL of the esophagus with morphologic evidence of both well-differentiated and dedifferentiated components. The diagnosis was confirmed by demonstration of CPM gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).
Abstract 4112: Prognostic impact of autophagic markers LC3, Beclin 1 and p62/sequestosome 1 in colon carcinomas from patients treated in 5-FU-based adjuvant therapy trials
Abstract Background. Autophagy maintains energy metabolism and enables tumor cell survival during cellular stress. Beclin 1 is involved in autophagosome formation during which membrane-bound LC3 binds to p62/sequestosome 1. We reported that ectopic p62 can promote 5-fluorouracil-induced cell death (JBC 286:40002-12, 2011). It is unknown whether these autophagy markers can predict clinical outcome. Materials & Methods. Beclin 1, LC3B, and p62 proteins were analyzed by immunohistochemistry in tissue microarrays containing stage II and III colon carcinomas (N=151) from patients receiving 5-FU or surgery alone. The mean weighted score (intensity x extent) was dichotomized for survival analysis using Cox models. Results. Increased levels of cytoplasmic LC3, Beclin 1, and p62 expression were detected in 21%, 14%, and 68% of cancers, respectively, and were not associated with tumor site, stage or grade. By multivariable analysis, increased LC3 was significantly associated with worse disease-free survival (DFS) (p=0.022), but not overall survival (OS) [p=0.069](Table). Beclin 1 was not prognostic, but increased p62 was significantly associated with improved DFS (p=0.038), but not OS (p= 0.176)[Table]. When restricted to 5-FU-treated patients, increased LC3 was associated with worse DFS [HR= 2.38 (1.19, 4.75, p=0.020), elevated Beclin 1 predicted worse OS [HR=2.83 (1.27, 6.34), p = 0.019], and p62 was not prognostic. Conclusion. LC3 and Beclin 1 overexpression were independently associated with adverse outcome. Increased p62 was associated with better outcome consistent with its ability to promote cell death. These data support strategies to inhibit autophagy for therapeutic advantage. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4112. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-4112