Back to Authors

Fridell, Jonathan A.

0000-0002-8708-1506

Mayo Clinic

Indiana University School of Medicine

Citations 2

Pancreas Transplantation for Recipients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results of an International Survey
Fridell, Jonathan A. , Uva, Pablo D., Kukla, Aleksandra, Delonais‐Parker, Ava , Mansuri, Rushda Faruk, Axelrod, David, Dunn, Ty, Niederhaus, Silke V. , Parsons, Ronald, Pleass, Henry, Paraskevas, Steven , Rickels, Michael R., Stratta, Robert J., Ventura-Aguiar, Pedro, Fridell, Jonathan A. , Uva, Pablo Daniel , Kukla, Aleksandra , Axelrod, David A. , Dunn, Ty B , Parsons, Ronald F. , Pleass, Henry C. C. , Rickels, Michael R. , Stratta, Robert J. , Ventura‐Aguiar, Pedro , Woodside, Kenneth J. , Lentine, Krista L.

Transplantation Direct | June 7, 2026 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 7 | Pages: e1963

10.1097/txd.0000000000001963 Get It

Background. Pancreas transplantation (PT), historically limited to patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D), is currently performed successfully in selected patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, contemporary practice patterns and eligibility criteria for PT in T2D remain incompletely characterized. Methods. The International Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association Pancreas Transplant Interest Group developed an electronic survey to assess center-level approaches to patient phenotyping, candidacy, and peri- and posttransplant management for PT in patients with T2D. The survey was distributed to international transplant professionals during an International Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association Pre-Congress meeting on June 15, 2025. Results. Thirty-seven participants completed the survey. Most respondents’ programs offer PT for T2D only when a kidney transplant is also indicated. Fewer respondents’ programs also offer PT alone (10%), evaluate T2D candidates on a case-by-case basis (3%), or do not offer PT to patients with T2D (10%). Total daily insulin requirement and body mass index (BMI) were the most selected factors in determining eligibility. Considerable variability existed in metabolic thresholds: 62% of programs reported no C-peptide cutoff, whereas nearly half required a BMI of <30 kg/m 2 for C-peptide-positive candidates. Respondents frequently recommend weight-optimization strategies, including lifestyle modification, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and bariatric surgery for candidates exceeding acceptable BMI thresholds. Surgical technique, induction, and maintenance immunosuppression and early posttransplant glycemic management were largely uniform between T2D and T1D recipients. Conclusions. International practice reflects broad but heterogeneous adoption of PT for T2D, with most participants restricting its use to candidates requiring kidney transplantation and emphasizing integrated clinical phenotyping approaches.
Impact of pancreas transplantation alone on kidney function: A multicenter clinical cohort study
Kaur, Ravinder Jeet , Mujtahedi, Saad , Fridell, Jonathan A. , Benavides, Xiomara , Smith, Byron H. , Larson, Timothy S., Rizvi, Shafaq R., Kukla, Aleksandra , Dean, Patrick G. , Kudva, Yogish C. , Mujtahedi, Syed Saad, Smith, Byron , Dean, Patrick, Stegall, Mark D , Fridell, Jonathan A. , Rizvi, Shafaq, Odorico, Jon S. , Stegall, Mark D.

Clinical Transplantation | December 2, 2023 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/ctr.15212 Get It

AbstractPancreas transplantation alone (PTA) is a β cell replacement option for selected patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus; concerns have been raised regarding deterioration in kidney function (KF) after PTA. This retrospective multicenter study assessed actual impact of transplantation and immunosuppression on KF in PTA recipients at three Transplant Centers. The primary composite endpoint 10 years after PTA was >50% eGFR decline, eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, and/or receiving a kidney transplant (KT). Overall, 822 PTA recipients met eligibility. Median baseline and 10‐year eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) were 76.3 (58.1–100.8) and 51.3 (35.3–65.9), respectively. Primary composite endpoint occurred in 98 patients (53.5%) with 45 experiencing a >50% decrease in eGFR by 10 years post‐transplant, 38 eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 49 requiring KT. KF declined most significantly within 6 months post‐PTA, more often in females and patients with better preserved GFR up to 5 years with 11.6% kidney failure at 10 years. Patient survival and death‐censored graft survival were both 68% at 10 years with overall graft thrombosis rate 8%. KF declined initially after PTA but stabilized with further slow progression. In conclusion, prospective intervention studies are needed to test renal sparing interventions while gathering more granular data.