Griffiths, Leigh

ABSTRACT Objective To compare antigen removal processing with conventional sodium dodecyl sulfate decellularization for generating laryngotracheoesophageal scaffolds, focusing on preservation of extracellular matrix integrity and removal of immunogenic material. Methods Laryngotracheoesophageal complexes were harvested from C57BL/6 mice and processed using either antigen removal or sodium dodecyl sulfate‐based protocols. Scaffolds were analyzed for residual double‐stranded DNA content, collagen preservation, glycosaminoglycan retention, and ultrastructural integrity via histology, quantitative image analysis, and scanning electron microscopy. Results Both antigen removal and sodium dodecyl sulfate protocols achieved effective decellularization, with comparable dsDNA removal relative to native controls ( p = 0.001; p < 0.001). Antigen removal scaffolds demonstrated better collagen preservation compared to sodium dodecyl scaffolds, which exhibited marked collagen depletion (Muscle: Collagen I, p < 0.001; Collagen III, p < 0.01; Cartilage: Collagen I, p < 0.05; Collagen III, p < 0.01). Both antigen removal and sodium dodecyl sulfate groups showed significant glycosaminoglycan depletion compared with controls ( p < 0.001). Scanning electron microscopy confirmed superior ultrastructural preservation in antigen removal‐treated scaffolds, characterized by intact fibrillar architecture and lacunar morphology, while sodium dodecyl sulfate scaffolds demonstrated collapsed lacunae and irregular extracellular matrix organization. Conclusion Antigen removal processing generates laryngotracheoesophageal scaffolds with enhanced extracellular matrix preservation compared with conventional sodium dodecyl sulfate decellularization, while maintaining equivalent levels of antigen elimination. Retention of collagen and ultrastructure suggests antigen removal scaffolds may provide superior biomechanical and biologic performance for laryngeal tissue engineering. Although glycosaminoglycan depletion remains a limitation in both approaches, antigen removal scaffolds represent a promising pathway toward clinically translatable alternatives to immunosuppression‐dependent laryngotracheoesophageal repair. Level of Evidence Preclinical.

Abstract Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of hospitalization and mortality worldwide. Ventricular assist devices (VADs) represent an alternative to cardiac transplantation for advanced HF. The main FDA-approved VAD (HeartMate III, Abbott), while effective, requires major cardiac surgery to insert the inflow cannula into the cardiac apex, and is associated with numerous co-morbidities and re-hospitalizations related to continuous flow and an external drive line and power supply. Mi-VAD, Inc. aspires to improve outcomes and quality of life with a miniature, minimally invasive, pulsatile, transcutaneously-powered VAD that is implanted above the aortic valve and/or the pulmonary valve and offering a wide range of hemodynamic support suitable for both advanced-stage and less advanced HF. Through its unique placement, there is the potential for right ventricular and biventricular cardiac assist for patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy and HFpEF for whom current VAD therapy is ineffective. Mi-VAD, Inc. has achieved proof of concept with its prototype, providing pulsatile ECG gated cardiac assist up to 10L/minute. Following initial bench top performance testing and in vivo efficacy and safety studies future work will focus on the development of wireless charging capability and conducting GLP builds for verification, regulatory clearance and commercialization. Additional technical development will focus on AI-driven hemodynamic optimization using multimodal physiologic sensing towards patient-specific digital twin of the Mi-VAD platform.