Weyer, Peter J.

Nitrate and nitrite are precursors in the endogenous formation of N‐nitroso compounds (NOC), potential human carcinogens. We evaluated the association of nitrate and nitrite ingestion with postmenopausal ovarian cancer risk in the Iowa Women's Health Study. Among 28,555 postmenopausal women, we identified 315 incident epithelial ovarian cancers from 1986 to 2010. Dietary nitrate and nitrite intakes were assessed at baseline using food frequency questionnaire data. Drinking water source at home was obtained in a 1989 follow‐up survey. Nitrate‐nitrogen (NO3‐N) and total trihalomethane (TTHM) levels for Iowa public water utilities were linked to residences and average levels were computed based on each woman's duration at the residence. We computed multivariable‐adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using Cox proportional hazards regression. We tested interactions of nitrate with TTHMs and dietary factors known to influence NOC formation. Ovarian cancer risk was 2.03 times higher (CI = 1.22–3.38, ptrend = 0.003) in the highest quartile (≥2.98 mg/L) compared with the lowest quartile (≤0.47 mg/L; reference) of NO3‐N in public water, regardless of TTHM levels. Risk among private well users was also elevated (HR = 1.53, CI = 0.93–2.54) compared with the same reference group. Associations were stronger when vitamin C intake was <median (pinteraction = 0.01 and 0.33 for private well and public supplies, respectively). Dietary nitrate was inversely associated with ovarian cancer risk (ptrend = 0.02); whereas, dietary nitrite from processed meats was positively associated with the risk (ptrend = 0.04). Our findings indicate that high nitrate levels in public drinking water and private well use may increase ovarian cancer risk among postmenopausal women.

Abstract Background: Nitrate and nitrite are precursors of N-nitroso compounds, known animal and human carcinogens. Nitrate and nitrite are common in foods, such as vegetables and processed meats, and nitrate is a contaminant of drinking water. We previously reported an increased ovarian cancer risk associated with higher nitrate intake in public water supplies in the Iowa Women's Health Study. Here, we report results based on an additional 12 years of follow-up and we present results for dietary nitrate and nitrite intake. Methods: Among 28,555 postmenopausal women aged 55–69 y at baseline, we identified 315 incident epithelial ovarian cancers between 1986 and 2010. Dietary nitrate and nitrite intakes were assessed using a food frequency questionnaire at baseline. Information on drinking water source was obtained in 1989. Nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N) levels in public water supplies (average level 1955-1988) and water sources (finished surface or ground water) were from a database of monitoring data for Iowa water utilities. Cox proportional hazards regression generated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Because disinfection by-products (DBP) are higher in surface water and have been associated with increased risk for certain cancers, we determined whether the association between nitrate intake from drinking water and ovarian cancer risk differed by water source. Results: Neither total dietary nitrate nor nitrite intake was associated with ovarian cancer risk after adjusting for age, energy intake, family history of ovarian cancer, number of live births, and history of unilateral oophorectomy. Nitrate and nitrite intakes from animal or plant sources, or processed meats were not associated with ovarian cancer risk. Among women who drank public water, we observed an increased risk for ovarian cancer with higher average levels of NO3-N (ptrend=0.004). Compared with women in the lowest quartile of NO3-N levels (&lt;0.36 mg/L), risk was 1.81 (95% CI=1.08-3.05) and 2.02 (95% CI=1.21-3.36) times higher in the third (1.0-2.5 mg/L) and fourth (&gt;2.5 mg/L) quartiles, respectively. Ovarian cancer risk among private well water drinkers was elevated (HR=1.52, 95% CI=0.91-2.53) but not statistically significantly different from the referent group. When stratified by water source, the positive association between NO3-N levels in public water and ovarian cancer risk was confined to women who drank water from surface sources (ptrend=0.007; pinteraction=0.04). Conclusions: Dietary nitrate or nitrite intake was not associated with ovarian cancer risk. Our findings for nitrate intake from public water supplies suggest that nitrate intake from drinking water may increase ovarian cancer risk, particularly in the likely presence of other contaminants found in surface water. Further evaluation of DBP and other water contaminant levels on ovarian cancer risk in this population is warranted. Citation Format: Maki Inoue-Choi, Kristin E. Anderson, James R. Cerhan, Peter J. Weyer, Mary H. Ward. Dietary intake of nitrate and nitrite, nitrate in drinking water, and ovarian cancer risk among postmenopausal women in Iowa. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 149. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-149

Abstract Background: Ingested nitrate can form N-nitroso compounds endogenously, which may lead to DNA adducts and activating mutations in oncogenes. However, previous studies have reported null or inverse associations between dietary nitrate intake and cancer risk, while nitrate intake from drinking water has shown null or positive associations with cancer risk. These associations may be confounded by protective effects of dietary folate, which provides methyl groups for nucleotide synthesis, and thus plays a vital role in the DNA repair system. In a small case-control study, an increased risk of breast cancer was observed among individuals with high dietary nitrate relative to folate intake. We therefore evaluated interaction of total folate with nitrate intake from diet and drinking water on breast cancer risk in the Iowa Women's Health Study (IWHS). Methods: The IWHS is a prospective cohort study of cancer among 41,836 women in Iowa, initiated in 1986. Dietary intake was assessed at study baseline using a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Nitrate intake from foods and total folate intake from foods and dietary supplements were computed using consumption frequencies collected by the FFQ. Nitrate intake from drinking water was assessed using a historical analytical database on Iowa municipal water supplies in 15,151 women using municipal water supply. We evaluated the interaction of nitrate and total folate intake with breast cancer risk using Cox proportional hazard regression modeling, adjusting for potential confounders (age, body mass index, waist-hip-ratio, education, smoking, family history of breast cancer, age at menopause, age at first live birth, estrogen use, total energy intake, and intake of vitamin C and E and flavonoids). Results: After baseline exclusions (history of cancer at baseline, previous mastectomy or partial breast resection, implausible energy intake, or ≥30 missing responses on the FFQ), there were 34,388 postmenopausal women in the analytic cohort. Through 2008, 2,875 incident breast cancer cases were identified. Nitrate intake from diet or drinking water was not associated with breast cancer risk. After stratification by total folate intake, high dietary nitrate intake (&gt;106.1 mg/day) was associated with a marginally decreased risk of breast cancer compared to those with low nitrate intake (≤106.1 mg/day) (HR=0.90, 95% confidence interval=0.81–1.00) only among women with folate intake &lt;400 μg/day (p for interaction = 0.65). There was no interaction of nitrate intake from drinking water and total folate intake on breast cancer risk. Conclusions: Our findings do not support the previously reported increased risk of breast cancer risk among individuals with high dietary nitrate and low folate intake. The inverse association between nitrate intake and breast cancer risk observed among women with low folate intake in the present study may be attributed to residual confounding due to high correlation among intakes of nitrate, folate and antioxidants. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2011;4(10 Suppl):A86.