Inoue‐Choi, Maki

Abstract Background: Different molecules within coffee may be pro-carcinogenic, while others may have anti-oxidant and anti-neoplastic effects. Hence, it can be hypothesized that coffee may have differing risk associations with specific colorectal cancer (CRC) subtypes. The aim of this study was to evaluate associations between coffee consumption and incident CRC overall, by anatomic subsite, and by molecularly defined tumor subtypes, in the population-based Iowa Women's Health Study (IWHS). Methods: IWHS participants, ages 55-69 years, provided dietary intake estimates using self-reported food frequency questionnaires at baseline (1986). From 35,216 women included the final analysis, 1298 developed CRC (673 with proximal CRC, 597 with distal CRC) through December 31, 2002 (end of the IWHS molecular epidemiology project study period). Archived, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens for 732 representative CRC cases were collected and analyzed to determine if coffee consumption (none or <1 cup/month, <1 cup/week, 1 cup/day, 2-3 cups/day and ≥4 cups/day) was associated with microsatellite instability (MSI-L/MSS or MSI-H), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP-negative or CIMP-positive), BRAF mutation status (BRAF-wildtype or BRAF-mutated), KRAS mutation status (KRAS-wildtype and KRAS-mutated), p53 protein expression level (p53 absent, low or high) and estrogen receptor β protein expression level (ERβ absent, low or high). Multivariable Cox regression models were fit to estimate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with adjustment for age, smoking, alcohol use, diabetes, body mass index and waist-hip ratio, physical activity, estrogen use, dietary intake of fat, calcium, vitamin E, sucrose, red meat and methionine. P-values were not adjusted for multiple testing. Results: There was no significant difference in the risk of overall (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.85-1.29; Ptrend=0.50), proximal (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.68-1.21; Ptrend=0.57) or distal CRC (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.86-1.64; Ptrend=0.19) in women who consumed ≥4 cups of coffee/day (caffeinated or decaffeinated), as compared to non-consumers. By CRC molecular subtypes for these same two exposure groups, women with ≥4 cups of coffee/day were more likely to develop ERβ-low CRC (RR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.04-8.51; Ptrend=0.06), though no significant associations were observed for caffeinated or decaffeinated coffee specifically. In contrast, women who consumed ≥4 cups of decaffeinated coffee/day were less likely to develop MSI-L/MSS (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.92; Ptrend=0.04) and BRAF-WT (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.44-1.06; Ptrend=0.06) CRCs than non-consumers. Women who consumed ≥4 cups of caffeinated coffee/day were also less likely to develop p53-low CRCs (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.24-1.15; Ptrend=0.02). Null associations were observed between decaffeinated coffee consumption and risk of CIMP-, KRAS- and p53- defined CRC subtypes, as well as between caffeinated coffee consumption and risk of MSI-, BRAF-, CIMP- or KRAS-defined CRC subtypes. Conclusion: In this prospective cohort study of older women, though coffee consumption was not associated with risk of overall or site-specific CRC, unique associations were observed with molecularly defined CRC subtypes, supporting a need for further investigation of the potential pro- and anti-carcinogenic effects of coffee constituents on biologic targets involved in colorectal carcinogenesis. Citation Format: Siddharth Singh, Robert Vierkant, Lori Tillmans, Alice Wang, Daniel Weisenberger, Peter Laird, Maki Inoue-Choi, Andrea Mariani, Charles Lynch, Kristin Anderson, Amy French, Robert Haile, Lisa Harnack, John Potter, Susan Slager, Thomas Smyrk, Stephen Thibodeau, James Cerhan, Paul Limburg. Coffee consumption and colorectal cancer risk by molecularly defined subtypes in a prospective cohort study of older women. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research; 2013 Oct 27-30; National Harbor, MD. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2013;6(11 Suppl): Abstract nr A44.

Nitrate and nitrite are precursors in the endogenous formation of N‐nitroso compounds (NOC), potential human carcinogens. We evaluated the association of nitrate and nitrite ingestion with postmenopausal ovarian cancer risk in the Iowa Women's Health Study. Among 28,555 postmenopausal women, we identified 315 incident epithelial ovarian cancers from 1986 to 2010. Dietary nitrate and nitrite intakes were assessed at baseline using food frequency questionnaire data. Drinking water source at home was obtained in a 1989 follow‐up survey. Nitrate‐nitrogen (NO3‐N) and total trihalomethane (TTHM) levels for Iowa public water utilities were linked to residences and average levels were computed based on each woman's duration at the residence. We computed multivariable‐adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using Cox proportional hazards regression. We tested interactions of nitrate with TTHMs and dietary factors known to influence NOC formation. Ovarian cancer risk was 2.03 times higher (CI = 1.22–3.38, ptrend = 0.003) in the highest quartile (≥2.98 mg/L) compared with the lowest quartile (≤0.47 mg/L; reference) of NO3‐N in public water, regardless of TTHM levels. Risk among private well users was also elevated (HR = 1.53, CI = 0.93–2.54) compared with the same reference group. Associations were stronger when vitamin C intake was <median (pinteraction = 0.01 and 0.33 for private well and public supplies, respectively). Dietary nitrate was inversely associated with ovarian cancer risk (ptrend = 0.02); whereas, dietary nitrite from processed meats was positively associated with the risk (ptrend = 0.04). Our findings indicate that high nitrate levels in public drinking water and private well use may increase ovarian cancer risk among postmenopausal women.

Abstract Background: Nitrate and nitrite are precursors of N-nitroso compounds, known animal and human carcinogens. Nitrate and nitrite are common in foods, such as vegetables and processed meats, and nitrate is a contaminant of drinking water. We previously reported an increased ovarian cancer risk associated with higher nitrate intake in public water supplies in the Iowa Women's Health Study. Here, we report results based on an additional 12 years of follow-up and we present results for dietary nitrate and nitrite intake. Methods: Among 28,555 postmenopausal women aged 55–69 y at baseline, we identified 315 incident epithelial ovarian cancers between 1986 and 2010. Dietary nitrate and nitrite intakes were assessed using a food frequency questionnaire at baseline. Information on drinking water source was obtained in 1989. Nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N) levels in public water supplies (average level 1955-1988) and water sources (finished surface or ground water) were from a database of monitoring data for Iowa water utilities. Cox proportional hazards regression generated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Because disinfection by-products (DBP) are higher in surface water and have been associated with increased risk for certain cancers, we determined whether the association between nitrate intake from drinking water and ovarian cancer risk differed by water source. Results: Neither total dietary nitrate nor nitrite intake was associated with ovarian cancer risk after adjusting for age, energy intake, family history of ovarian cancer, number of live births, and history of unilateral oophorectomy. Nitrate and nitrite intakes from animal or plant sources, or processed meats were not associated with ovarian cancer risk. Among women who drank public water, we observed an increased risk for ovarian cancer with higher average levels of NO3-N (ptrend=0.004). Compared with women in the lowest quartile of NO3-N levels (&lt;0.36 mg/L), risk was 1.81 (95% CI=1.08-3.05) and 2.02 (95% CI=1.21-3.36) times higher in the third (1.0-2.5 mg/L) and fourth (&gt;2.5 mg/L) quartiles, respectively. Ovarian cancer risk among private well water drinkers was elevated (HR=1.52, 95% CI=0.91-2.53) but not statistically significantly different from the referent group. When stratified by water source, the positive association between NO3-N levels in public water and ovarian cancer risk was confined to women who drank water from surface sources (ptrend=0.007; pinteraction=0.04). Conclusions: Dietary nitrate or nitrite intake was not associated with ovarian cancer risk. Our findings for nitrate intake from public water supplies suggest that nitrate intake from drinking water may increase ovarian cancer risk, particularly in the likely presence of other contaminants found in surface water. Further evaluation of DBP and other water contaminant levels on ovarian cancer risk in this population is warranted. Citation Format: Maki Inoue-Choi, Kristin E. Anderson, James R. Cerhan, Peter J. Weyer, Mary H. Ward. Dietary intake of nitrate and nitrite, nitrate in drinking water, and ovarian cancer risk among postmenopausal women in Iowa. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 149. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-149

Abstract Background: Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake has been associated with an increased risk of obesity and type II diabetes. However, its association with endometrial cancer is unclear. Methods: We evaluated dietary intake of SSB, fruit juice, sugar-free beverages, sweets/baked goods, starch, and sugars among 23,039 postmenopausal women in the Iowa Women's Health Study. Incident estrogen-dependent type I and estrogen-independent type II endometrial cancers were identified via linkage with the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Registry. Risks of type I and type II endometrial cancers were separately compared by energy-adjusted dietary intake in Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: From 1986 to 2010, 506 type I and 89 type II incident endometrial cancers were identified. An increased risk of type I endometrial cancer was observed with increasing SSB intake after adjustment for body mass index (BMI) and other cofounders (Ptrend = 0.0005). Compared with nondrinkers of SSB, the risk was 78% higher [95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.32–2.40] among women in the highest quintile of SSB intake. The observed association was not modified by BMI, physical activity, history of diabetes, or cigarette smoking. Higher risk of type I endometrial cancer was also observed with higher intake of sugars. None of the dietary items included in the analysis was associated with type II endometrial cancer risk. Conclusion: Higher intake of SSB and sugars was associated with an increased risk of type I, but not type II, endometrial cancer. Impact: SSB intake may be a risk factor for type I endometrial cancer regardless of other lifestyle factors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 22(12); 2384–94. ©2013 AACR.

Abstract Background: Ingested nitrate can form N-nitroso compounds endogenously, which may lead to DNA adducts and activating mutations in oncogenes. However, previous studies have reported null or inverse associations between dietary nitrate intake and cancer risk, while nitrate intake from drinking water has shown null or positive associations with cancer risk. These associations may be confounded by protective effects of dietary folate, which provides methyl groups for nucleotide synthesis, and thus plays a vital role in the DNA repair system. In a small case-control study, an increased risk of breast cancer was observed among individuals with high dietary nitrate relative to folate intake. We therefore evaluated interaction of total folate with nitrate intake from diet and drinking water on breast cancer risk in the Iowa Women's Health Study (IWHS). Methods: The IWHS is a prospective cohort study of cancer among 41,836 women in Iowa, initiated in 1986. Dietary intake was assessed at study baseline using a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Nitrate intake from foods and total folate intake from foods and dietary supplements were computed using consumption frequencies collected by the FFQ. Nitrate intake from drinking water was assessed using a historical analytical database on Iowa municipal water supplies in 15,151 women using municipal water supply. We evaluated the interaction of nitrate and total folate intake with breast cancer risk using Cox proportional hazard regression modeling, adjusting for potential confounders (age, body mass index, waist-hip-ratio, education, smoking, family history of breast cancer, age at menopause, age at first live birth, estrogen use, total energy intake, and intake of vitamin C and E and flavonoids). Results: After baseline exclusions (history of cancer at baseline, previous mastectomy or partial breast resection, implausible energy intake, or ≥30 missing responses on the FFQ), there were 34,388 postmenopausal women in the analytic cohort. Through 2008, 2,875 incident breast cancer cases were identified. Nitrate intake from diet or drinking water was not associated with breast cancer risk. After stratification by total folate intake, high dietary nitrate intake (&gt;106.1 mg/day) was associated with a marginally decreased risk of breast cancer compared to those with low nitrate intake (≤106.1 mg/day) (HR=0.90, 95% confidence interval=0.81–1.00) only among women with folate intake &lt;400 μg/day (p for interaction = 0.65). There was no interaction of nitrate intake from drinking water and total folate intake on breast cancer risk. Conclusions: Our findings do not support the previously reported increased risk of breast cancer risk among individuals with high dietary nitrate and low folate intake. The inverse association between nitrate intake and breast cancer risk observed among women with low folate intake in the present study may be attributed to residual confounding due to high correlation among intakes of nitrate, folate and antioxidants. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2011;4(10 Suppl):A86.