Koo, Chi Wan

Objective: Investigate the performance of multiparametric MRI radiomic features, alone or combined with current standard-of-care methods, for pulmonary nodule classification. Assess the impact of segmentation variability on feature reproducibility and reliability. Methods: Radiomic features were extracted from 74 pulmonary nodules of 68 patients who underwent nodule resection or biopsy after MRI exam. The MRI features were compared with histopathology and conventional quantitative imaging values (maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax] and mean Hounsfield unit [HU]) to determine whether MRI radiomic features can differentiate types of nodules and associate with SUVmax and HU using Wilcoxon rank sum test and linear regression. Diagnostic performance of features and four machine learning (ML) models were evaluated with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) assessed the segmentation variation impact on feature reproducibility and reliability. Results: Elevn diffusion-weighted features distinguished malignant from benign nodules (adjusted p < 0.05, AUC: 0.73–0.81). No features differentiated cancer types. Sixty-seven multiparametric features associated with mean CT HU and 14 correlated with SUVmax. All significant MRI features outperformed traditional imaging parameters (SUVmax, mean HU, apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC], T1, T2, dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging values) in distinguishing malignant from benign nodules with some achieving statistical significance (p < 0.05). Adding ADC and smoking history improved feature performance. Machine learning models demonstrated strong performance in nodule classification, with extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) having the highest discrimination (AUC = 0.83, CI=[0.727, 0.932]). We found good to excellent inter- and intrareader feature reproducibility and reliability (CCC≥0.80). Conclusion: Eleven MRI radiomic features differentiated malignant from benign lung nodules, outperforming traditional quantitative methods. MRI radiomic ML models demonstrated good nodule classification performances with XGBoost superior to three others. There was good to excellent inter- and intrareader feature reproducibility and reliability. Advances in knowledge: Our study identified MRI radiomic features that successfully differentiated malignant from benign lung nodules and demonstrated high performance of our MR radiomic feature-based ML models for nodule classification. These new findings could help further establish thoracic MRI as a non-invasive and radiation-free alternative to standard practice for pulmonary nodule assessment.

Objectives: The objectives of the study were to estimate the impact of high matrix image reconstruction on chest computed tomography (CT) compared to standard image reconstruction. Material and Methods: This retrospective study included patients with interstitial or parenchymal lung disease, airway disease, and pulmonary nodules who underwent chest CT. Chest CT images were reconstructed using high matrix (1024 × 1024) or standard matrix (512 × 512), with all other parameters matched. Two radiologists, blinded to reconstruction technique, independently examined each lung, viewing image sets side by side and rating the conspicuity of imaging findings using a 5-point relative conspicuity scale. The presence of pulmonary nodules and confidence in classification of internal attenuation was also graded. Overall image quality and subjective noise/artifacts were assessed. Results: Thirty-four patients with 68 lungs were evaluated. Relative conspicuity scores were significantly higher using high matrix image reconstruction for all imaging findings indicative of idiopathic lung fibrosis (peripheral airway visualization, interlobular septal thickening, intralobular reticular opacity, and end-stage fibrotic change; P ≤ 0.001) along with emphysema, mosaic attenuation, and fourth order bronchi for both readers (P ≤ 0.001). High matrix reconstruction did not improve confidence in the presence or classification of internal nodule attenuation for either reader. Overall image quality was increased but not subjective noise/artifacts with high matrix image reconstruction for both readers (P < 0.001). Conclusion: High matrix image reconstruction significantly improves the conspicuity of imaging findings reflecting interstitial lung disease and may be useful for diagnosis or treatment response assessment.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an inflammatory condition encompassing greater than 200 different chronic disorders that often lead to pulmonary fibrosis and the attendant morbidity and mortality. Distinguishing one ILD from another can be challenging even for experts given similar clinical manifestations. However, firm diagnosis is important for management, counseling, and surveillance. Computer-Aided Lung Informatics for Pathology Evaluation and Ratings (CALIPER, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA), a machine learned image analysis tool for characterizing and quantifying diffused lung diseases on CT, has been shown to correlate with ILD mortality such as for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The CALIPER assessment of ILD is not influenced by confounding conditions such as emphysema or pulmonary hypertension that may affect pulmonary function measurements. Moreover, CALIPER can provide more reproducible results with less inter- and intraobserver variability compared to the conventional subjective visual assessment of CT scans by radiologists. Herein, we aim to provide an overview of ILD and discuss CALIPER evaluation of ILD.