Back to Authors

Yilmaz, Ibrahim

Mayo Clinic

Jacksonville College

Citations 3

Pathology Foundation Models: Evolution, Current Landscape, Challenges and Opportunities from a Technical and Clinical Perspective
Alasi, Hussien , Yilmaz, Ibrahim, Reynolds, Jordan, Agarwal, Shweta, Nassar, Aziza , Zubair, Abba C. , Horbinski, Craig, Dangott, Bryan, Akkus, Zeynettin , Reynolds, Jordan , Al-Asi, Hussien , Reynolds, Jordan P , Zubair, Abba C , Nassar, Aziza , Akkus, Zeynettin , Yilmaz, Ibrahim , Agarwal, Shweta, Horbinski, Craig , Dangott, Bryan

Bioengineering | May 20, 2026 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 577

10.3390/bioengineering13050577 Get It

Foundation models are reshaping computational pathology by enabling scalable task-agnostic representations of histopathological whole-slide images (WSIs). Unlike earlier task-specific deep learning systems, pathology foundation models (PFMs) leverage massive whole-slide image repositories and self-supervised Vision Transformer architectures to achieve broad generalization and few-shot adaptability. Their evolution reflects a shift from weakly supervised approaches such as Clustering-Constrained Attention Multiple Instance Learning (CLAM) and hierarchical architectures such as Hierarchical Image Pyramid Transformer (HIPT) to large-scale efforts including foundation models, UNI, Virchow, Phikon, CONtrastive learning from Captions for Histopathology (CONCH), GigaPath, H-Optimus, Transformer-Based Pathology Image and Text Alignment Network (TITAN), and the Mayo Clinic Atlas. These models demonstrate impressive performance across diagnostic and prognostic benchmarks while also opening pathways for multimodal integration with genomics and clinical data. Yet significant barriers remain including inconsistent generalization across institutions, interpretability lagging behind clinical needs, and slow integration into routine laboratory workflows. Certain domains of anatomic pathology such as cytopathology, transplant pathology, frozen sections, and rare tumor subtypes remain particularly resistant to current models. Here, we review the development of PFMs, critically evaluate their strengths and limitations, and outline priorities for their safe and effective clinical translation. We argue that the next phase of PFM development will depend on rigorous benchmarking, pathologist-in-the-loop deployment, and multimodal fusion ensuring these models evolve from research tools into clinically robust systems.
Challenges and Opportunities in Cytopathology Artificial Intelligence
VandeHaar, Meredith A. , Alasi, Hussien , Doganay, Fatih, Alazab, Heba, Xiao, Yao , Balan, Jagadheshwar , Dangott, Bryan, Nassar, Aziza , Akkus, Zeynettin , Al-Asi, Hussien , Yilmaz, Ibrahim, Balan, Jagadheshwar , Dangott, Bryan J, Nassar, Aziza , Akkus, Zeynettin , Yilmaz, Ibrahim, Reynolds, Jordan

Bioengineering | February 13, 2025 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 176

10.3390/bioengineering12020176 Get It

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize cytopathology by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, and accessibility. However, the implementation of AI in this field presents significant challenges and opportunities. This review paper explores the current landscape of AI applications in cytopathology, highlighting the critical challenges, including data quality and availability, algorithm development, integration and standardization, and clinical validation. We discuss challenges such as the limitation of only one optical section and z-stack scanning, the complexities associated with acquiring high-quality labeled data, the intricacies of developing robust and generalizable AI models, and the difficulties in integrating AI tools into existing laboratory workflows. The review also identifies substantial opportunities that AI brings to cytopathology. These include the potential for improved diagnostic accuracy through enhanced detection capabilities and consistent, reproducible results, which can reduce observer variability. AI-driven automation of routine tasks can significantly increase efficiency, allowing cytopathologists to focus on more complex analyses. Furthermore, AI can serve as a valuable educational tool, augmenting the training of cytopathologists and facilitating global health initiatives by making high-quality diagnostics accessible in resource-limited settings. The review underscores the importance of addressing these challenges to harness the full potential of AI in cytopathology, ultimately improving patient care and outcomes.
Artificial Intelligence Advances in Transplant Pathology
Rahman, Md Arafatur , Albadri, Sam , Salem, Fadi , Dangott, Bryan, Nassar, Aziza , Akkus, Zeynettin , Yilmaz, Ibrahim, Albadri, Sam T, Salem, Fadi E , Dangott, Bryan J, Taner, C. Burcin , Nassar, Aziza , Akkus, Zeynettin , Yilmaz, Ibrahim

Bioengineering | September 4, 2023 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1041

10.3390/bioengineering10091041 Get It

Transplant pathology plays a critical role in ensuring that transplanted organs function properly and the immune systems of the recipients do not reject them. To improve outcomes for transplant recipients, accurate diagnosis and timely treatment are essential. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI)-empowered digital pathology could help monitor allograft rejection and weaning of immunosuppressive drugs. To explore the role of AI in transplant pathology, we conducted a systematic search of electronic databases from January 2010 to April 2023. The PRISMA checklist was used as a guide for screening article titles, abstracts, and full texts, and we selected articles that met our inclusion criteria. Through this search, we identified 68 articles from multiple databases. After careful screening, only 14 articles were included based on title and abstract. Our review focuses on the AI approaches applied to four transplant organs: heart, lungs, liver, and kidneys. Specifically, we found that several deep learning-based AI models have been developed to analyze digital pathology slides of biopsy specimens from transplant organs. The use of AI models could improve clinicians’ decision-making capabilities and reduce diagnostic variability. In conclusion, our review highlights the advancements and limitations of AI in transplant pathology. We believe that these AI technologies have the potential to significantly improve transplant outcomes and pave the way for future advancements in this field.