Butterfield, Richard

Objectives To compare patients’ perception of their degree of subglottic stenosis to their endoscopic exam findings, Clinical Dyspnea Questionnaire, and peak flow results. Study Design Prospective Multi-Institutional. Setting Tertiary Care Clinic. Methods A study of 50 patients comparing patients’ perception of their degree of subglottic stenosis to their endoscopic exam findings. All patients filled out a Clinical Dyspnea Questionnaire and a 10-point scale reflecting their perceived degree of stenosis in 10% intervals. Surgeons filled out the same scale based on measurements from the patients’ exam. Accuracy was defined as +/-1 on a 10-point scale. Pulmonary function testing, number of dilation procedures undergone, cause of stenosis, and demographic information were collected. Results Data complete for 49/50 patients. 48 (98%) were female, 47 (97.9%) Caucasian, 44 (89.8%) had idiopathic subglottic stenosis, and 28 (58.3%) had Grade I subglottic stenosis on the Cotton-Meyer scale. Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.67 indicating moderate correlation overall but 0.88, or high correlation, for those with normal Body Mass Index. Increased Dyspnea Index scores and higher Body Mass Index were correlated with decreased accuracy. Number of previous procedures was not correlated with accuracy. Higher Body Mass Index was correlated with increased dyspnea and lower peak flow volume. Conclusion Patients with normal Body Mass Index have strong predictive accuracy regarding their degree of subglottic stenosis. Better dyspnea scores were correlated with improved accuracy. There is no standard consensus on subglottic stenosis patient follow up. Prior studies have looked at using peak flow meters and validated questionnaires to monitor symptoms.