Butterfield, R.

Objectives To compare patients’ perception of their degree of subglottic stenosis to their endoscopic exam findings, Clinical Dyspnea Questionnaire, and peak flow results. Study Design Prospective Multi-Institutional. Setting Tertiary Care Clinic. Methods A study of 50 patients comparing patients’ perception of their degree of subglottic stenosis to their endoscopic exam findings. All patients filled out a Clinical Dyspnea Questionnaire and a 10-point scale reflecting their perceived degree of stenosis in 10% intervals. Surgeons filled out the same scale based on measurements from the patients’ exam. Accuracy was defined as +/-1 on a 10-point scale. Pulmonary function testing, number of dilation procedures undergone, cause of stenosis, and demographic information were collected. Results Data complete for 49/50 patients. 48 (98%) were female, 47 (97.9%) Caucasian, 44 (89.8%) had idiopathic subglottic stenosis, and 28 (58.3%) had Grade I subglottic stenosis on the Cotton-Meyer scale. Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.67 indicating moderate correlation overall but 0.88, or high correlation, for those with normal Body Mass Index. Increased Dyspnea Index scores and higher Body Mass Index were correlated with decreased accuracy. Number of previous procedures was not correlated with accuracy. Higher Body Mass Index was correlated with increased dyspnea and lower peak flow volume. Conclusion Patients with normal Body Mass Index have strong predictive accuracy regarding their degree of subglottic stenosis. Better dyspnea scores were correlated with improved accuracy. There is no standard consensus on subglottic stenosis patient follow up. Prior studies have looked at using peak flow meters and validated questionnaires to monitor symptoms.

Critically ill patients frequently require intrahospital transport (IHT) to diagnostic exams or procedures and must remain connected to life-sustaining medical lines. During IHT, the risk of tangled medical lines is unavoidable. The idea for a novel medical line securement device was inspired by a patient transport nurse due to frustrations and workflow inefficiencies managing tangled medical lines. The study aim was to explore the correlation between the utilization of a single-use securement device to manual or accidental disconnections of medical lines during IHT, and nurses’ perception of efficiency, compared to the current practice of no utilization of a securement device. In 2019, a randomized, descriptive, correlational study was conducted on 142 progressive and intensive care hospitalized patients. Study coordinators measured the number of times either IV lines or monitor cords were accidentally or manually disconnected to detangle during or after transportation and the perception of transport efficiency. Results revealed fewer manual disconnections among intervention group compared to the control. Nurses’ perception regarding the efficiency between the intervention and control group was statistically significant when the device was utilized to secure the lines and cords during transport. Nurses reported much higher satisfaction rates of transport efficiency when the device was used. This finding showed the device’s utility for improving nurse satisfaction during IHT of critically ill patients. Utilization of the medical line securement device may be generalizable across other healthcare settings and disciplines where the complexity of medical lines may exist.