Kerr, Sarah E.

Background:The cytologic diagnosis of atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) is controversial because of variation in how it is applied in practice, as well as uncertainty about patient management. We aimed to assess the percentage of thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsies (FNABs) with AUS/FLUS diagnoses in different North American and European practice settings (e.g. community, academic, etc.), assess whether patients were managed according to current guidelines, and determine patient outcomes.Materials and Methods:A detailed questionnaire survey was posted in secure websites used separately by cytopathologists and cytotechnologists. The questionnaire was posted from August 1 through December 31, 2013.Results:Endocrinologists and cytopathologists performed 51.7% and 37.1% of thyroid FNABs, respectively. The Bethesda reporting system for thyroid FNAB was used in 90% of practices. The rate of AUS/FLUS varied widely among institutions, with 46.1% of represented institutions reporting AUS/FLUS rates of 3–10%. The median follow-up rate of patients with an initial AUS/FLUS diagnosis was 70% (range, 10–100%). For the majority of represented institutions (86.4%), patients with initial AUS/FLUS diagnosis had follow-up with endocrinologists. Of repeat AUS/FLUS thyroid FNABs, a median of 52% was considered benign, and 18% were suspicious of or positive for malignancy (median, 10% and 7.5%, respectively).Conclusions:Reporting of the AUS/FLUS category varied widely among different institutions. The median follow-up rate was lower than published guidelines. The most common follow-up diagnosis was benign thyroid nodule. Improved standardization of cytologic criteria should be adopted to reduce such variation.

Abstract Background: Mucinous ovarian carcinomas (MC) and mucinous borderline ovarian tumours (MBOT) are associated with ERBB2 amplification and KRAS activating mutations. These events occur in a near-mutually exclusive pattern, and KRAS mutations are more prevalent in MBOTs than MC's whereas ERBB2 amplification is more frequently seen in MCs. Frequencies of mutations in other oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes in MC are not well established though TP53, BRAF, NRAS, and CDKN2A mutations have all been reported. As these carcinomas are commonly chemo-resistant a definitive molecular categorization of this subtype is needed as treatment options are explored. Methods: We undertook review of pathology reports and after exclusion of potential gastric, appendiceal or pancreatic involvement over 100 mucinous ovarian tumours were identified. HPV testing was undertaken to exclude rare metastasis from endocervical primary site. All specimens were assayed for p53 expression via TMA and subject to sequencing of common cancer gene hotspots using Ion-Torrent or Illumina MiSeq. Previously derived data on ERBB2 status was combined in our analysis and, where available, samples showing heterogeneity of ERBB2 amplification and any other Ras-pathway activating mutation were microdissected with components evaluated independently for concurrent hotspot mutations. Results: All samples were consistent with mucinous tumours of ovarian origin and none were HPV positive. We detected mutations in KRAS, BRAF, CDKN2A, TP53, PTEN, PIK3CA as well as presumed somatic/detrimental, variants in APC that have not previously been reported in mucinous tumours. Despite some samples having enriched tumour content, lower than expected allelic frequencies of KRAS activating mutations suggested intra-tumoural heterogeneity. This was consistent with results observed previously with rare ERBB2 amplification coinciding KRAS mutations. Conclusions: The prevalence of Ras-pathway mutations, especially amongst borderline lesions, suggests these mutations are critical for tumour onset. However varying allelic frequencies of KRAS mutations suggest progression to carcinoma is strongly influenced by other molecular features. Citation Format: Michael S. Anglesio, Robertson Mackenzie, Stefan Kommoss, Boris J. Winterhoff, Benjamin Kipp, Jaoquin Garcia, Jesse S. Voss, Kevin Halling, Sarah Kerr, Janine Senz, Winnie Yang, Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz, Elena-Sophie Prigge, Miriam Reuschenbach, Anna V. Tinker, Blake Gilks, Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez, David G. Huntsman, Jessica N. McAlpine. Defining ovarian mucinous tumors: Cancer genes and heterogeneity. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research: From Concept to Clinic; Sep 18-21, 2013; Miami, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2013;19(19 Suppl):Abstract nr A18.

ABSTRACT Genital human papillomavirus (HPV) is the etiologic agent of more than 99% of all cervical cancers worldwide, with 14 genotypes being considered oncogenic or “high risk” because of their association with severe dysplasia and cervical carcinoma. Among these 14 high-risk types, HPV-16 and -18 account for approximately 70% of cervical cancers. The aim of this study was to evaluate three FDA-approved HPV nucleic acid-based tests for the ability to predict high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN2 or worse) in corresponding tissue biopsy specimens. Residual specimens (total n = 793, cervical n = 743, vaginal n = 50) collected in ThinPrep PreservCyt medium with a cytologic result of ≥atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance were tested by the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) assay (Qiagen, Gaithersburg, MD), the cobas HPV test (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN), and the APTIMA HPV assay (Hologic, San Diego, CA). Genotyping for HPV-16 and HPV-18 was simultaneously performed by the cobas HPV test. Results were compared to cervical or vaginal biopsy findings, when they were available ( n = 350). Among the 350 patients with corresponding biopsy results, 81 (23.1%) showed ≥CIN2 by histopathology. The ≥CIN2 detection sensitivity was 91.4% by the cobas and APTIMA assays and 97.5% by HC2 assay. The specificities of the cobas, APTIMA, and HC2 assays were 31.2, 42.0, and 27.1%, respectively. When considering only positive HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 genotype results, the cobas test showed a sensitivity and a specificity of 51.9 and 86.6%, respectively. While the HC2, cobas, and APTIMA assays showed similar sensitivities for the detection of ≥CIN2 lesions, the specificities of the three tests varied, with the greatest specificity (86.6%) observed when the HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 genotypes were detected.

BACKGROUNDMultigene molecular testing to guide personalized therapy for oncology patients is of increasing clinical relevance. Molecular testing of fine‐needle aspiration samples is underused, but when acquired with minimally invasive techniques could become the standard of care to obtain theranostic specimens. The aims of the current study were to identify key cytology specimen selection criteria suitable for next‐generation sequencing (NGS) and to determine the prevalence and spectrum of pathogenic alterations in a cohort of patients with AJCC stage IV lung cancer.METHODSA total of 70 adrenal gland cytology specimens with direct smears were screened to identify 56 patients with a single slide containing at least 300 total cells and 20% tumor nuclei. After DNA extraction, the NGS protocols were used to simultaneously detect mutations in >2800 exonic regions in 50 key cancer genes.RESULTSA total of 28 specimens produced acceptable NGS results. Specimens with a combined critical cell mass (>5000 viable cells) and a DNA concentration >5 ng/µL resulted in a 95% chance of successful sequencing. A total of 37 pathogenic alterations were identified in 10 genes and in 25 patients (85%). A pathogenic alteration (≥1) linked to available or developing targeted therapies was revealed in 50% of cases.CONCLUSIONSThe data from the current study demonstrate that theranostic NGS can be applied to adrenal gland metastasis using routine cytologic smear specimens. The characteristics of such smears could be evaluated during onsite adequacy assessment by cytopathology professionals. This model greatly augments the opportunity for customized genotype‐directed therapy from minimally invasive techniques. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2014;122:822–832. © 2014 American Cancer Society.

Abstract Purpose: Accurate tumor classification is essential for cancer management as patient outcomes improve with use of site- and subtype-specific therapies. Current clinicopathologic evaluation is varied in approach, yet standardized diagnoses are critical for determining therapy. While gene expression–based cancer classifiers may potentially meet this need, imperative to determining their application to patient care is validation in rigorously designed studies. Here, we examined the performance of a 92-gene molecular classifier in a large multi-institution cohort. Experimental Design: Case selection incorporated specimens from more than 50 subtypes, including a range of tumor grades, metastatic and primary tumors, and limited tissue samples. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumors passed pathologist-adjudicated review between three institutions. Tumor classification using a 92-gene quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay was conducted on blinded tumor sections from 790 cases and compared with adjudicated diagnoses. Results: The 92-gene assay showed overall sensitivities of 87% for tumor type [95% confidence interval (CI), 84–89] and 82% for subtype (95% CI, 79–85). Analyses of metastatic tumors, high-grade tumors, or cases with limited tissue showed no decrease in comparative performance (P = 0.16, 0.58, and 0.16). High specificity (96%–100%) was showed for ruling in a primary tumor in organs commonly harboring metastases. The assay incorrectly excluded the adjudicated diagnosis in 5% of cases. Conclusions: The 92-gene assay showed strong performance for accurate molecular classification of a diverse set of tumor histologies. Results support potential use of the assay as a standardized molecular adjunct to routine clinicopathologic evaluation for tumor classification and primary site diagnosis. Clin Cancer Res; 18(14); 3952–60. ©2012 AACR.