Romero-Brufau, Santiago

Abstract Objectives To address the gap between artificial intelligence (AI) model development and clinical implementation by developing a machine-learning model to predict cochlear implant (CI) eligibility based on routine hearing tests, while illustrating 3 practical lessons: reformulation for clinical utility, selection of problem-specific metrics, and handling input data variability. Materials and Methods Data were extracted from adult patients who underwent behavioral audiometric and subsequent CI candidacy testing (Arizona Biomedical and Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant tests) at Mayo Clinic between 2011 and 2023. Regression models were initially developed to predict AzBio and CNC scores using features from routine audiograms. Models were then reformulated into binary classification tasks using clinical thresholds (AzBio ≤60%; CNC <50%) and reported sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). Input data variability was assessed by analyzing test-retest differences in isophonemes scores. Results Binary classification models achieved sensitivity of 90.4% with PPV 80.2% at CNC 50/AzBio 60, outperforming referral heuristics (60/60 and 75/40). Applying the models to 50 700 historical audiograms identified 525 patients at PPV 90% (sensitivity 58%), 396 at PPV 94% (sensitivity 44%), and 1582 at PPV 71% (sensitivity 94%). Variability analyses indicated that attainable precision is bounded by noise in key predictors. Conclusion This study demonstrates how AI models can be translated into clinically actionable tools by reformulating regression outputs, selecting metrics aligned with clinical priorities, and addressing data variability. These strategies provide a scalable framework for implementing AI in health care and improving decision-making in diverse clinical contexts.

Abstract Objective Electronic health record documentation by intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians may predict patient outcomes. However, it is unclear whether physician and nursing notes differ in their ability to predict short-term ICU prognosis. We aimed to investigate and compare the ability of physician and nursing notes, written in the first 48 hours of admission, to predict ICU length of stay and mortality using 3 analytical methods. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective cohort study with split sampling for model training and testing. We included patients ≥18 years of age admitted to the ICU at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts, from 2008 to 2012. Physician or nursing notes generated within the first 48 hours of admission were used with standard machine learning methods to predict outcomes. Results For the primary outcome of composite score of ICU length of stay ≥7 days or in-hospital mortality, the gradient boosting model had better performance than the logistic regression and random forest models. Nursing and physician notes achieved area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.826 and 0.796, respectively, with even better predictive power when combined (AUC, 0.839). Discussion Models using only nursing notes more accurately predicted short-term prognosis than did models using only physician notes, but in combination, the models achieved the greatest accuracy in prediction. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate that statistical models derived from text analysis in the first 48 hours of ICU admission can predict patient outcomes. Physicians’ and nurses’ notes are both uniquely important in mortality prediction and combining these notes can produce a better predictive model.

Background: Burnout syndrome is very prevalent among healthcare residents. Initiatives addressing workload conditions have had limited impact on burnout. The present study aims to explore the contribution of two emotion regulation strategies, namely emotion suppression and cognitive reevaluation, to residents’ burnout, while accounting for workload factors. Methods: Participants were 105 residents (68.6% women; mean age = 27.5, SD = 3.0). They completed measures of workload, burnout, and emotion regulation. The study was cross-sectional. Results: Emotional suppression was associated with higher burnout (depersonalization scale; β = 0.20, p < 0.05, CI 0.15–2.48) and cognitive revaluation was linked to lower burnout (higher personal accomplishment; β = 0.35, p < 0.01, CI 0.16–2.56), even after controlling for demographic and workload factors. We found interaction effects between workload variables (supervisor support and number of patient hours) and emotion regulation (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The relationship between workload, emotion regulation, and burnout seems to be complex. That is, similar work conditions might generate different levels of burnout depending on the resident’s emotional regulation strategies. This might partly explain why existing initiatives based on workload changes have had a modest impact on burnout. Results also support including emotion regulation training in prevention and treatment programs targeting burnout during residency.

Abstract Background Hospital readmissions are a key quality metric, which has been tied to reimbursement. One strategy to reduce readmissions is to direct resources to patients at the highest risk of readmission. This strategy necessitates a robust predictive model coupled with effective, patient-centered interventions. Objective The aim of this study was to reduce unplanned hospital readmissions through the use of artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support. Methods A commercially vended artificial intelligence tool was implemented at a regional hospital in La Crosse, Wisconsin between November 2018 and April 2019. The tool assessed all patients admitted to general care units for risk of readmission and generated recommendations for interventions intended to decrease readmission risk. Similar hospitals were used as controls. Change in readmission rate was assessed by comparing the 6-month intervention period to the same months of the previous calendar year in exposure and control hospitals. Results Among 2,460 hospitalizations assessed using the tool, 611 were designated by the tool as high risk. Sensitivity and specificity for risk assignment were 65% and 89%, respectively. Over 6 months following implementation, readmission rates decreased from 11.4% during the comparison period to 8.1% (p < 0.001). After accounting for the 0.5% decrease in readmission rates (from 9.3 to 8.8%) at control hospitals, the relative reduction in readmission rate was 25% (p < 0.001). Among patients designated as high risk, the number needed to treat to avoid one readmission was 11. Conclusion We observed a decrease in hospital readmission after implementing artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support. Our experience suggests that use of artificial intelligence to identify patients at the highest risk for readmission can reduce quality gaps when coupled with patient-centered interventions.

The need for multiple transducer positions, especially from right parasternal windows, is consistently mentioned in the recommendations for the accurate measurement of peak velocities across a stenotic aortic valve, but yet poorly adopted. We performed a subanalysis of the largest prospective series on the right parasternal acoustic windows in patients with aortic stenosis (330 consecutive) to calculate the degree of misalignment and estimate the potential outcome implication of this often-forgotten approach. The right parasternal view was highly feasible with an average estimated misalignment from the apical view of 14 ± 16 degree; in 10 cases, an estimated misalignment >40 degree. Right parasternal assessment (vs. apical alone) provided a significant reclassification from moderate to severe or even very-severe aortic valve stenosis. Considering a wellestablished survival benefit provided by either percutaneous or surgical valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis the reclassification would result in approximately 1 life-year saved for every 30–35 patients in whom parasternal view were effectively utilized.

Abstract Introduction Identification of hospitalized patients with suddenly unfavorable clinical course remains challenging. Models using objective data elements from the electronic health record may miss important sources of information available to nurses. Methods We recorded nurses’ perception of patient potential for deterioration in 2 medical and 2 surgical adult hospital units using a 5-point score at the start of the shift (the Worry Factor [WF]), and any time a change or an increase was noted by the nurse. Cases were evaluated by three reviewers. Intensive care unit (ICU) transfers were also tracked. Results 31 159 patient-shifts were recorded for 3185 unique patients during 3551 hospitalizations, with 169 total outcome events. Out of 492 potential deterioration events identified, 380 (77%) were confirmed by reviewers as true deterioration events. Likelihood ratios for ICU transfer were 17.8 (15.2–20.9) in the 24 hours following a WF &gt; 2, and 40.4 (27.1–60.1) following a WF &gt; 3. Accuracy rates were significantly higher in nurses with over a year of experience (68% vs 79%, P = 0.04). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.92 for the prediction of ICU transfer within 24 hours. Discussion This is a higher accuracy than most published early warning scores. Conclusion Nurses’ pattern recognition and sense of worry can provide important information for the detection of acute physiological deterioration and should be included in the electronic medical record.