Ailawadhi, Sikander

Key Points PVD is an active combination in relapsed lenalidomide-refractory MM patients. PVD with weekly bortezomib offers a simpler, more convenient, and well-tolerated regimen option.

232 Background: Screening for distress in cancer patients (pts) is recommended by several national guidelines. High distress scores are associated with increased depression. We established universal depression screening and investigated its impact on cancer patient management. Methods: Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) was administered to newly diagnosed cancer patients prior to receiving their first non-oral antineoplastic agent. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, chronic medication load, antidepressant use, treatment interruptions, weight change, referral and adherence to psychiatry were recorded. Pts with high (> 9) and low (< 4) PHQ9 scores were compared using Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Results: Screening was performed in 1,190 consecutive pts over an 18 month period at Mayo Clinic. Responses were received from 1055 (89%) pts, of which 144 had high score (PHQ-H). These were compared with 99 randomly selected low score (PHQ-L) pts. The 243 pts (median age 65; range 18-92 years) in the final analysis included: 53.5% females, 90% Caucasians, 74% married and 77% living with others. Diagnosis was solid organ cancer in 81% and metastatic disease in 54% patients, and 13% were on antidepressants for preexisting depression. PHQ-H were more likely to be on antidepressants than PHQ-L (19% vs. 3%; p = 0.0002), be referred to psychiatry (69% vs. 12%; p < 0.0001), attend psychiatry appointment (45% vs. 12%; p < 0.0001) and require behavioral therapy (50% vs 8%; p = 0.0065). PHQ-H did not have a significantly increased antidepressant use, treatment interruptions (p = 0.5) or weight change (p = 0.4). Race, gender, chronic medication load, marital status, living situation, metastatic disease and type of cancer were not significantly different between PHQ-H and PHQ-L. Conclusions: We implemented a universal depression screening and management plan for cancer pts and noted that previously being on antidepressants was associated with higher patient distress. Higher score led to more frequent behavioral therapy, possibly preventing non-compliance or need for increased psychotropic medications. Our model identifies cancer pts with depression and implements an effective management plan for their care.

Background: The phase II, exploratory, open-label Exploring Nilotinib BCR-ABL Effects (ENABL) study [ ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00644878] assessed the impact of switching to nilotinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) who had a suboptimal molecular response with imatinib. Methods: Patients with CML-CP who had previously achieved a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), but had a suboptimal molecular response, with frontline imatinib therapy ( N = 18) were assigned to receive nilotinib 300 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was the change in BCR-ABL1 transcript levels from baseline after 12 months; rates of major molecular response (MMR) and safety were also assessed. Results: At 3 months after switching to nilotinib, 10 of 17 (59%) evaluable patients had achieved MMR. At 12 months, 9 of 12 (75%) evaluable patients had achieved MMR, and the median BCR-ABL1 level among all patients remaining in the study was 0.020% on the International Scale (IS), equivalent to a 3.7-log reduction from the standardized IS baseline (primary endpoint). Adverse events (AEs) were typically grade 1/2 and manageable with dose interruptions. A total of three patients experienced serious study drug-related AEs, including pancreatitis, bradycardia, and vertigo. No deaths were reported. Conclusions: Overall, results from this exploratory study suggest that switching to nilotinib due to suboptimal molecular response with imatinib can result in improved molecular response for patients with CML-CP.

Key Points The combination of ixazomib and dexamethasone has clinical activity in patients with relapsed and or refractory multiple myeloma. Higher dose of ixazomib leads to improved response rates but with higher rates of treatment related adverse events.

Abstract Background: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in European populations have identified genetic risk variants associated with multiple myeloma. Methods: We performed association testing of common variation in eight regions in 1,318 patients with multiple myeloma and 1,480 controls of European ancestry and 1,305 patients with multiple myeloma and 7,078 controls of African ancestry and conducted a meta-analysis to localize the signals, with epigenetic annotation used to predict functionality. Results: We found that variants in 7p15.3, 17p11.2, 22q13.1 were statistically significantly (P &lt; 0.05) associated with multiple myeloma risk in persons of African ancestry and persons of European ancestry, and the variant in 3p22.1 was associated in European ancestry only. In a combined African ancestry–European ancestry meta-analysis, variation in five regions (2p23.3, 3p22.1, 7p15.3, 17p11.2, 22q13.1) was statistically significantly associated with multiple myeloma risk. In 3p22.1, the correlated variants clustered within the gene body of ULK4. Correlated variants in 7p15.3 clustered around an enhancer at the 3′ end of the CDCA7L transcription termination site. A missense variant at 17p11.2 (rs34562254, Pro251Leu, OR, 1.32; P = 2.93 × 10−7) in TNFRSF13B encodes a lymphocyte-specific protein in the TNF receptor family that interacts with the NF-κB pathway. SNPs correlated with the index signal in 22q13.1 cluster around the promoter and enhancer regions of CBX7. Conclusions: We found that reported multiple myeloma susceptibility regions contain risk variants important across populations, supporting the use of multiple racial/ethnic groups with different underlying genetic architecture to enhance the localization and identification of putatively functional alleles. Impact: A subset of reported risk loci for multiple myeloma has consistent effects across populations and is likely to be functional. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(12); 1609–18. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract Approximately 27,000 new cases of multiple myeloma (MM) will be diagnosed and more than 11,000 deaths will occur from it in 2015. Overall, 5-year relative survival rates have improved from 26.5% in 1975 to 44.9% in 2010, and this has been attributed to the introduction of novel therapeutic agents, widespread utilization of autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), and improvement in supportive care modalities. However, studies evaluating the role of race/ethnicity in MM have shown marked disparities in incidence and outcomes of MM among patients of different racial subgroups. Traditionally, it has been known that African-Americans (AA) have a higher incidence of MM than Whites and that it occurs in AA at a younger age. Despite this difference in incidence, AA patients are known to have a better overall survival (OS) than Whites. Recent population-based outcomes analyses of MM patients beyond just Whites and AA has shown that Asians have the best median OS, while Hispanics have the worst, in a population that is more representative of the current US racial/ethnic mix. Additionally, the cumulative survival benefit over time as per a recent report was most pronounced among Whites (1.3 years) and least among Asians (0.5 years), suggesting a possible differential access as well as utilization of therapeutic modalities. Thus, despite overall improvement in MM outcomes over years, racial disparities exist. While majority of the data so far has reported the existence of these outcome disparities, a few reports have explored the potential causes of these differences. With regards to disease biology, there is some data suggesting that MM patients belonging to different races may have variability in the incidence of high-risk mutations, with AA MM patients having a lower incidence of such mutations, supporting the better OS seen in AA patients as compared to Whites. Another suggestion supporting differences in an interaction between biologic and environmental factors in MM patients is the variability in incidence of second primary malignancies in patients after they have developed MM, which may affect their outcome and OS. Other causes of outcome disparities may include a differential access to certain treatment options, especially more complex ones like stem cell transplants, as well as certain novel therapeutic agents that may depend on the patient's insurance payer status, which brings up differences in socioeconomic status, education level and barriers in accessing healthcare. It has also been reported recently that access to comprehensive cancer centers has benefitted Whites more than racial minorities. While access issues are being reported for MM patients belonging to different races, it has been suggested that outcome disparities by race are not noted in equal access healthcare systems. The potential shortcomings for these studies in equal access healthcare systems though, have been small size, mostly single-institution and focusing primarily on Whites and AA, without much representation yet of Hispanics and Asians, despite these two racial subgroups being the fastest growing ones in the US. Outcome disparities in MM by patient race have been established. The factors affecting these outcome disparities may be complex and interrelated, making it difficult to identify specific factors that may be modifiable. Yet, it is important to explore outcome disparities and their potential causes, especially in large cohorts prospectively, so that healthcare resources may be utilized efficiently and furthermore, the disadvantaged population subgroups may be benefitted by targeted interventions. Citation Format: Sikander Ailawadhi. Outcome disparities in multiple myeloma: The role of race/ethnicity. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Eighth AACR Conference on The Science of Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; Nov 13-16, 2015; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016;25(3 Suppl):Abstract nr IA07.

Abstract Background: It has been shown that t(14;18), a translocation involving IgH and BCL-2 genes that is present in over 80% of all cases of follicular lymphomas, is detectable in the peripheral blood of up to 52% of normal Caucasian patients from Germany and up to 16% of normal individuals from Japan (Yasukawa et al, Blood 2001). The fact that follicular lymphoma is one of the two most common lymphomas in the USA and Germany and much less common in Japan, demonstrates that this molecular alteration is perhaps an early event in the development of this malignancy which is not sufficient for its causation. There have not been any studies evaluating the prevalence of this translocation in healthy African American (AA) subjects. We speculated that the prevalence of this translocation will be lower in healthy AA subjects given the findings of lower prevalence of IgH translocations in AA patients with multiple myeloma compared with Caucasian patients, which may explain the better outcome of myeloma in AA subjects (Baker et al, Blood 2013). This effort to evaluate the prevalence of t (14; 18) in AA subjects, was part of a pilot study in which we brought an educational program on the importance of cancer research together with concomitant access to a translational research project to AA churches utilizing a mobile research unit in an attempt to overcome some of the known barriers to AA subject participation in clinical research (Colon-Otero et al, Cancer2008; Colon-Otero et al, J Cancer Educ 2012). Methods: IRB approval of the project was obtained and peripheral blood samples collected from consented subjects during educational sessions in Northeast Florida AA Churches. Caucasian subjects were identified from the Mayo Clinic Bio-bank. DNA was isolated from the buffy coat fractions and a PCR quality control assay targeting a 293bp fragment of an HLA class II gene was used to determine acceptable DNA quality and quantity. Next, a two-step semi-nested PCR was performed on the t (14;18) major and minor breakpoint cluster regions using ~500ng of DNA for each assay. A consensus JH primer was used in combination with primers complementary to BCL-2 sequences for both, the major and minor breakpoint cluster regions. PCR products were run on a 1% agarose gel. In order to confirm the positive results, positive PCR products were analyzed by direct sequence by Sanger method and subsequently assembled to the human genome using BLAST tool. Results: A total of 110 blood samples from AA subjects were analyzed for the presence of t (14;18). A total of 13 of the samples were positive for the major breakpoint site (12%) and 4 were positive for the minor breakpoint site (4%), for a total of 17 positive samples (15%). In 167 Caucasian patients samples, a total of 22 (13%) were positive for the major breakpoint site and 5 (3%) were positive for the minor breakpoint site for a total of 27 positive samples (16%). All cases were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Conclusions: The prevalence of t(14;18) is not significantly different among African American and Caucasian subjects from the USA based on our findings. This represents the first report of the prevalence of t(14;18) in an African American population. The prevalence found in our Caucasian subjects is significantly lower than what had been described in previous population series. A plausible explanation is the high heterogeneity of approaches used across studies, significantly affecting the assay sensitivity. Additional studies with larger series may reveal minor differences in the prevalence of t(14;18) among these populations. Citation Format: Scott Van Wier, Gerardo Colon-Otero, Gregory Ahmann, Esteban Braggio, Monica Albertie, Sikander Ailawadhi, Rafael Fonseca. Similar prevalence of t(14,18) in African American and Caucasian subjects. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Eighth AACR Conference on The Science of Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; Nov 13-16, 2015; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016;25(3 Suppl):Abstract nr B48.

Dysferlinopathy is an uncommon, progressive muscular dystrophy that has a wide phenotypic variability and primarily supportive management (Nguyen et al., 2007; Narayanaswami et al., 2014). Amyloid myopathy is a distinct, rare disorder that can present similarly to inflammatory myopathies and requires a high clinical suspicion for early intervention to prolong survival. Amyloid myopathy is typically associated with other systemic manifestations of amyloidosis, but rare cases of isolated amyloid myopathy have been described (Mandl et al., 2000; Hull et al., 2001). Positive Congo red stains on tissue biopsy remain the gold standard for diagnosis (Spuler et al., 1998; Karacostas et al., 2005). A high clinical suspicion and meticulous diagnostic workup that includes novel techniques are necessary for identifying these rare disorders. We report a middle-aged man with progressive leg muscle weakness who was initially treated as having amyloid myopathy but was later diagnosed as having dysferlinopathy by Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) analysis. We also report a novel missense mutation (c.959G>C) to help correlate in any patient with presumed dysferlinopathy and to add to the already known genotype of this disorder.

BACKGROUNDNational Cancer Institute (NCI)/National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)–designated cancer centers (CCs) offer patients state‐of‐the‐art treatment, but their impact on multiple myeloma (MM) patient outcomes has not been evaluated.METHODSAdult MM patients diagnosed between 1973 and 2011 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and were stratified by the county of residence at the time of diagnosis and the year of CC designation. The influence of NCI/NCCN CC access, race, and the year of diagnosis on overall survival (OS) was evaluated with a Cox regression model.RESULTSA statistically significant OS improvement was noted in patients diagnosed after 1995 with access to 2 or more NCI CCs overall (P = .002 for 1996‐2002; P < .001 for 2003‐2011) and by race for whites (hazard ratio [HR] for 1996‐2002, 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78‐0.91; HR for 2003‐2011, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79‐0.91) but not for nonwhites. For NCCN access, improvement was seen in 1996‐2002 (P = .003), in 2003‐2011 (P < .001), and by race for whites (HR, 0.917; 95% CI, 0.88‐0.95) and nonwhites (0.94; 95% CI, 0.89‐0.99), but within nonwhites, this was true only for African Americans (AAs; HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81‐0.97) and not for Asians, Hispanics, or Native Americans.CONCLUSIONSImprovement in OS was seen in MM patients diagnosed after 1995 with access to 1 NCCN CC or 2 or more NCI CCs. NCI access benefited only whites, whereas NCCN access benefited only white and AA patients. No OS benefit was seen for any subgroup with access to only 1 NCI center. Eliminating racial disparities in health care access and utilization is needed to improve outcomes. Cancer 2016;122:618–625. © 2015 American Cancer Society.