Schroth, Gary P.

ObjectiveMutations in Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease (CMT) genes are the cause of rare familial forms of polyneuropathy. Whether allelic variability in CMT genes is also associated with common forms of polyneuropathy—considered “acquired” in medical parlance—is unknown. Chemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) occurs commonly in cancer patients and is individually unpredictable. We used CIPN as a clinical model to investigate the association of non‐CMT polyneuropathy with CMT genes.MethodsA total of 269 neurologically asymptomatic cancer patients were enrolled in the clinical trial Alliance N08C1 to receive the neurotoxic drug paclitaxel, while undergoing prospective assessments for polyneuropathy. Forty‐nine CMT genes were analyzed by targeted massively parallel sequencing of genomic DNA from patient blood.ResultsA total of 119 (of 269) patients were identified from the 2 ends of the polyneuropathy phenotype distribution: patients that were most and least susceptible to paclitaxel polyneuropathy. The CMT gene PRX was found to be deleteriously mutated in patients who were susceptible to CIPN but not in controls (p = 8 × 10−3). Genetic variation in another CMT gene, ARHGEF10, was highly significantly associated with CIPN (p = 5 × 10−4). Three nonsynonymous recurrent single nucleotide variants contributed to the ARHGEF10 signal: rs9657362, rs2294039, and rs17683288. Of these, rs9657362 had the strongest effect (odds ratio = 4.8, p = 4 × 10−4).InterpretationThe results reveal an association of CMT gene allelic variability with susceptibility to CIPN. The findings raise the possibility that other acquired polyneuropathies may also be codetermined by genetic etiological factors, of which some may be related to genes already known to cause the phenotypically related Mendelian disorders of CMT. Ann Neurol 2014;76:727–737

Abstract Background: Estrogen receptor (ER) expression in breast caner is an important biomarker for targeted therapy and outcome prediction. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanism that controls the phenotypic difference is little known. We used deep sequence technology to profile the transcriptome, gene copy number, and CpG island methylation simultaneously in eight commonly used breast cell lines to develop a model for how these genomic features are integrated in ER+ and ER- breast cancer. Materials and methods: Total mRNA sequence (mRNA-seq), gene copy number (DNA-seq), and genomic CpG island methylation (Methyl-seq) were carried out using the Illumina Genome Analyzer. Sequences were mapped to the human genome (hg18) to obtain digitized gene expression data, DNA copy number in reference to the non-tumor cell line (MCF10A), and methylation status of 21,570 CpG islands; differentially expressed genes between ER+ and ER- cell lines were selected and then correlated with methylation status of these genes’ CpG islands within 5kb of transcript start or copy number changes. The genes that appeared controlled by methylation or copy number changes in cell lines were further evaluated for their expression in the dataset of 129 primary breast tumors. Results: ER+ breast cancer cells had very different gene expression pattern from ER- cancer cells. The two cell line types formed two distinct clusters in unsupervised cluster and 1,873 genes were differentially expressed by moderated t statistics. We identified 149 differentially expressed genes that exhibited differential methylation of one or more CpG islands within 5kb of the 5’ end of the gene and for which mRNA abundance was inversely correlated with CpG island methylation status. Eighty nine of these 149 genes were also differentially expressed in the primary tumor samples and 84 of them were consistent with cell line gene expression and methylation data. The set of 149 genes were significantly enriched in the ER+ tumors by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis. Part of chromosome 8 was deleted in all ER- cells and part of chromosome 17 amplified in all ER+ cells. These loci encoded 30 genes that were overexpressed in ER+ cells; however, only 9 of these genes were overexpressed in ER+ tumors. Many of the methylation or CNA affected genes were functionally significant and some are known to be associated with breast cancer outcome such as GATA3 and LYN. Conclusions: A global pattern of differential CpG island methylation influences expression of a cohort of genes that contribute to the transcriptome landscape of ER+ and ER- breast cancer cells and tumors. The role of gene amplification/deletion in defining the transcriptome landscape of ER+ and ER- cells appears to more modest, although several potentially significant genes appear to be globally regulated by copy number aberrations. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4908. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-4908

Abstract The role of fusion gene transcripts such as BRC-ABL1 has been long appreciated in hematopoietic malignancies. Recent evidence from next generation sequencing projects has suggested that gene fusion events and the resultant chimaeric transcripts may be expressed in solid tumors. We have developed a novel bioinformatics analytical pipeline to detect fusion gene transcripts from paired-end mRNA-seq data. The bioinformatics tool used for fusion transcript discovery employs multiple steps of false positive filtering and nominates the fusion transcript candidates with high confidence (approaching 100%). The screening and validation of the fusion candidates were quickly carried out using the recommended primer design regions as one of the outputs of the SnowShoes-FD pipeline. This pipeline was used to analyze the transcriptome of 22 breast cancer cell lines and 9 non-transformed breast cell populations. Fifty-four fusion candidates were nominated, all of which were validated using reverse transcription PCR and Sanger sequencing. Five fusion products were predicted to have a second fusion junction point between two fusion partners. These 54 fusion transcripts consist of 103 partner genes that are involved in cell cycle and/or nuclear receptor signaling. No fusion transcripts were identified from the non-transformed breast cell lines. We subsequently analyzed a panel of primary breast tumors, 8 each HER2+, triple negative, and ER+. Fifteen novel fusion transcript candidates have been nominated. Validation and functional analysis of these candidates is in progress. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-276. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-LB-276

Abstract Fusion genes and fusion gene products are widely employed as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in hematopoietic cancers, but their applications have yet to be appreciated in solid tumors. Here, we report the use of SnowShoes-FTD, a powerful new analytic pipeline that can identify fusion transcripts and assess their redundancy and tumor subtype-specific distribution in primary tumors. In a study of primary breast tumors, SnowShoes-FTD was used to analyze paired-end mRNA-Seq data from a panel of estrogen receptor (ER)+, HER2+, and triple-negative primary breast tumors, identifying tumor-specific fusion transcripts by comparison with mRNA-Seq data from nontransformed human mammary epithelial cell cultures plus the Illumina Body Map data from normal tissues. We found that every primary breast tumor that was analyzed expressed one or more fusion transcripts. Of the 131 tumor-specific fusion transcripts identified, 86 were “private” (restricted to a single tumor) and 45 were “redundant” (distributed among multiple tumors). Among the redundant fusion transcripts, 7 were unique to ER+ tumors and 8 were unique to triple-negative tumors. In contrast, none of the redundant fusion transcripts were unique to HER2+ tumors. Both private and redundant fusion transcripts were widely expressed in primary breast tumors, with many mapping to genomic loci implicated in breast carcinogenesis and/or risk. Our finding that some fusion transcripts are tumor subtype-specific suggests that these entities may be critical determinants in the etiology of breast cancer subtypes, useful as biomarkers for tumor stratification, or exploitable as cancer-specific therapeutic targets. Cancer Res; 72(8); 1921–8. ©2012 AACR.