Back to Authors

McLaughlin, Sarah A.

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 20

Breast Cancer in the Young Patient: Review of Therapy and Treatment Considerations
Subhedar, Preeti , McLaughlin, Sarah A.

Breast Cancer Management | June 8, 2020 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.2217/bmt-2020-0008 Get It

Trends in utilization of sentinel node biopsy and adjuvant radiation in women ≥ 70
Gunn, Jinny , Lemini, Riccardo , Partain, Kristin N. , Yeager, Tamanie E. , Almerey, Tariq , McLaughlin, Sarah A., Gabriel, Emmanuel , Partain, Kristin, Yeager, Tamanie, Gabriel, Emmanuel M , Attwood, Kristopher M. , Bagaria, Sanjay P.

The Breast Journal | January 7, 2020 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1321-1329

10.1111/tbj.13750 Get It

Abstract 3377: Simultaneous analysis of the mutational landscape and RNA and protein expression profile of HER2-positive breast cancer using 3D BiologyTM
Chumsri, Sarayna, Serie, Daniel, Necela, Brian M. , Kachergus, Jennifer M., Axenfeld, Bianca C., Demirkan, Gokhan, Meredith, Gavin, Ross, Philipp , Kharkia, Anisha, Piazza, Erin , Mashadi-Hossein, Afshin , Warren, Sarah , McLaughlin, Sarah A., Beechem, Joseph , Geiss, Gary , Thompson, E. Aubrey

Cancer Research | July 31, 2017 | Volume: 77 | Issue: 13_Supplement | Pages: 3377-3377

10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-3377 Get It

Abstract Background: Understanding heterogeneity within individual breast tumors is key to the ability to predict therapeutic outcome. Molecular heterogeneity is commonly evaluated based on genomic features, including mRNA abundance, gene copy number events, and somatic mutations. The expression profile and activation state of key proteins is widely recognized as another key element in defining tumor heterogeneity. We have taken advantage of NanoString 3D Biology™ technology (for research use only) and curated nCounter Vantage 3DTM Solid Tumor Assay to interrogate a survey panel of HER2-positive breast tumors with the ultimate goal of determining key relationships between multiple genomic and proteomic profiles in individual tumors. Methods: We analyzed samples from 24 HER2+ breast cancer patients using NanoString technology to quantify the expression profile for over 25 total and phospho signaling proteins, including PI3K/MAPK/EGFR/HER2, 770 mRNA corresponding to 13 canonical cancer pathways, and 104 somatic mutations and small INDELS that are commonly associated with cancer, including 8 known PIK3CA mutations. These analyses were carried out in a matched fresh frozen and FFPE samples on the nCounter paltform. Data were analyzed by nSolver to identify genotype specific expression profiles across the 24 samples. Results: In our proof-of-concept data set, we successfully demonstrate that NanoString’s 3D biology Technology shows concordance across both FFPE and fresh frozen sample types for DNA, RNA, and protein. NanoString analysis also showed high concordance to gold-standard techniques used to assess genotype and RNA expression profiles. The combination of digital DNA, RNA, and protein data from our HER2+ breast cancer samples yielded potentially actionable data based on mapping of mutational status as the driver of key differences in protein expression and mRNA abundance of the signaling targets profiled. This work sheds new light on HER2+ breast cancer biology and the interplay between genomic and proteomic profiles while setting the stage for future studies that further probe the differences observed in this sample set. Conclusions: Simultaneous analysis of mutational status (SNV) and expression at the level of both mRNA and protein promises to enable a more detailed view of the relationship between genotype and the biological and clinical behavior of key tumor types. The NanoString Vantage 3DTM Solid Tumor platform provides a rapid, reliable, and economic means of assessing these analytes simultaneously. The application of these analytes to models that make clinically actionable predictions will require additional analyses of large sample cohorts, but such analysis is quite feasible using a variety of sample types. Acknowledgements: Supported in part by grants from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation and the 26.2 with Donna Foundation. Citation Format: Sarayna Chumsri, Daniel J. Serie, Brian M. Necela, Jennifer M. Kachergus, Bianca C. Axenfeld, Gokhan Demirkan, Gavin Meredith, P. Martin Ross, Anisha Kharkia, Erin Piazza, Afshin Mashadi-Hossein, Sarah Warren, Sarah A. McLaughlin, Joseph Beechem, Gary Geiss, E. Aubrey Thompson. Simultaneous analysis of the mutational landscape and RNA and protein expression profile of HER2-positive breast cancer using 3D BiologyTM [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3377. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-3377
Breast cancer treatment and recurrence in octogenarians.
Harris, Adam S. , McLaughlin, Sarah A., Adkisson, Cameron D., Gibson, Tammeza, Diehl, Nancy N. , Pockaj, Barbara A. , Bagaria, Sanjay P.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 27_suppl | Pages: 94-94

10.1200/jco.2012.30.27_suppl.94 Get It

94 Background: Octogenarian breast cancer (BrCa) patients accept less aggressive BrCa treatment due to decreased life expectancy, increased comorbidities, and high likelihood of death from other causes. Unfortunately little data exist stratifying octogenarian outcomes by disease risk. We sought to characterize treatment and recurrence patterns in patients >80yo. Methods: Retrospective review identified 432 women >80yo treated surgically for stage 0-3 BrCa between 11/99-8/11. We gathered clinicopathologic data and classified patients by disease risk as DCIS only, low risk (<2cm and ER positive and node negative), or high risk (>2cm or ER negative or node positive). We compared recurrence rates and estimated survival by Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: Among the 432 women, disease was found by mammogram in 86%, treated with BCT in 64%, and predominantly ER-positive (87%). We classified patients as having DCIS only (N=61), low risk (N=205), or high risk (N=166) disease. We identified the following deviations from standard treatment guidelines: 68% DCIS BCT and 38% high risk BCT patients did not have radiation therapy, 25% low risk BCT patients had surgery only, 51% low risk patients did not take adjuvant hormonal therapy, and 40% high risk patients had no adjuvant chemo/hormonal therapy. At 5 and 10 years the overall estimated survival was 63% and 31%, respectively. Overall, 19/432 (5%) patients developed recurrence (table 1). Patients needing mastectomy for high risk disease had significantly higher risk of recurrence than high or low risk BCT patients (p=0.02). Of the 19 recurrence patients, 7/19 (37%; 1 DCIS, 1 low risk, 5 high risk) occurred despite standard multimodality treatment, while12 (63%; 3 low risk, 9 high risk) had the initial tumor treated less aggressively due to patient choice (n=9) or medical co-morbidities (n=3). Conclusions: Significant deviations from treatment guidelines occur in women >80yo. Those with high risk disease should be counseled accordingly and encouraged to receive adjuvant treatment as two thirds of women >80yo will live at least 5 years. [Table: see text]
Abstract 4185: Analysis of sequencing data to identify potential drug targets for an individual newly diagnosed with basal breast cancer who failed to respond to current standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Barman, Poulami , Sicotte, Hugues , Vedell, Peter T. , Dockter, Travis , Jones, Katie N., Conners, Amy Lynn , Moyer, Ann M. , Visscher, Daniel W., Gao, Bowen , McLaughlin, Sarah A., Copland, John A. , Moreno‐Aspitia, Alvaro , Northfelt, Donald W. , Gray, Richard J. , Passow, Jeanette E. Eckel, Kocher, Jean‐Pierre , Wieben, Eric D. , Farrugia, Gianrico , Schultz, Cloann G. , Weinshilboum, Richard, Wang, Liewei , Kalari, Krishna R. , Tang, Xiaojia , Thompson, Kevin J. , Mahoney, Douglas W. , Sinnwell, Jason P. , Hart, Steven N. , Yu, Jia Xin , Suman, Vera J. , Ingle, James N. , Goetz, Matthew P. , Boughey, Judy C.

Cancer Research | May 4, 2015 | Volume: 74 | Issue: 19_Supplement | Pages: 4185-4185

10.1158/1538-7445.am2014-4185 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Next generation sequencing (NGS) of patients has significantly changed our ways to study cancer genomics as it provides precise estimates of gene expression, fusion transcripts, expressed single nucleotide variants (eSNVs), splice variants and copy number variants. The Breast Cancer Genome Guided Therapy (BEAUTY) is an ongoing clinical study in which RNA sequencing (RNAseq) and whole exome sequencing (WES) are performed prior to, during and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Here we report the use of these sequencing technologies to investigate gene expression levels and mutational profiles in a triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patient enrolled in BEAUTY whose disease did not respond to neoadjuvant paclitaxel and anthracycline/cycphosphamide. METHODS Computational approaches were used to integrate WES and RNAseq data obtained before therapy (V1T), after 12 weekly paclitaxel treatments (V2T) and after anthracycline-based regimen at surgical resection (V3T) to study a single patient with persistent TNBC disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS Using RNA-Seq data, we identified an inter-chromosomal fusion transcript between chromosome 20 and 22 (GNAS-TTC38) that was highly expressed at V1T, V2T and V3T. We also identified intra-chromosomal fusion transcripts that were expressed at two time points, such as fusion transcript (KANSL1-ARL17A) on chromosome 17 for V1T and V2T and fusion transcript (RBM12B-LINC00535) on chromosome 8 for V2T and V3T time points. Several gene expression changes were also observed. Gene expression analysis of V1T, V2T and V3T tumors was performed. Differential temporal gene expression profiles of 9884 genes that were significant and varying at different time points were obtained for pathway analysis. Pathway analysis of 9884 genes identified up regulation and down regulation of several transcription factors with a fold change of 2x or more. When compared to blood, DNA tumor and RNA-Seq data, we identified 81 common somatic eSNVs that were expressed in both V1T and V2T time points and we are in the process of investigating V3T data. We found alterations of key transporter domains (CD225, Coatamer_beta_C, DUF2435, Dynamitin, EI24, GLTP, LMF1, Porin_3, V-ATPase_C) in our V1T and V2T SNV data. Similar to gene expression analysis, we are in the process of obtaining the list of mutations at various time points to identify driver and passenger mutation candidate genes for this specific TNBC patient. CONCLUSIONS Our initial time-series analysis of eSNV, fusion transcripts and gene expression data demonstrate that intensive analysis for individual patients is feasible. Further investigation of drug transporters and transcription regulators may help develop personalized treatment strategies for patients with disease resistant to current regimens. Citation Format: Krishna R. Kalari, Xiaojia Tang, Kevin J. Thompson, Douglas W. Mahoney, Poulami Barman, Jason P. Sinnwell, Hugues Sicotte, Peter Vedell, Steven N. Hart, Travis J. Dockter, Katie N. Jones, Amy L. Conners, Ann M. Moyer, Daniel W. Visscher, Jia Yu, Bowen Gao, Sarah A. McLaughlin, John A. Copland, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Donald W. Northfelt, Richard J. Gray, Vera J. Suman, Jeanette E. Eckel Passow, Jean-Pierre A. Kocher, Eric D. Wieben, Gianrico Farrugia, Cloann G. Schultz, James N. Ingle, Richard Weinshilboum, Matthew P. Goetz, Liewei Wang, Judy C. Boughey. Analysis of sequencing data to identify potential drug targets for an individual newly diagnosed with basal breast cancer who failed to respond to current standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 4185. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-4185
Abstract PD3-3: Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the clonal composition of breast cancer
Barrett, Michael T. , McLaughlin, Sarah A., Moreno‐Aspitia, Alvaro , Moyer, Ann M. , Northfelt, Donald W. , Gray, Richard J. , Barman, Poulami , Vedell, Peter T. , Dockter, Travis , Jones, Katie, Felten, Sara J., Conners, Amy Lynn , Eckel‐Passow, Jeanette E. , Sicotte, Hughes, Yu, Jia , Visscher, Daniel W., Wieben, Eric D. , Schultz, Cloann G. , Liu, Minetta C. , Wang, Liewei , Weinshilboum, R., Goetz, Matthew P. , Kalari, Krishna R. , Suman, Vera J. , Sinnwell, Jason P. , Mahoney, Douglas W. , Tang, Xiaojia , Thompson, Kevin J. , Hart, Steven N. , Ingle, James N. , Boughey, Judy C.

Cancer Research | May 4, 2015 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 9_Supplement | Pages: PD3-3-PD3-3

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs14-pd3-3 Get It

Abstract Background Cancer genomic investigations have identified recurrent genomic aberrations critical for cancer initiation, progression, and metastases. However, these investigations are typically performed in isolation, and the effects of treatment on the clonal selection of tumor cells are mostly unknown. We hypothesized that molecular profiling of residual tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) would identify new drug targets/pathways in patients at high risk for disease recurrence. To better identify clonal populations of resistant breast cancer cells, we utilized DNA content-based flow sorting of nuclei to identify and isolate clonal populations for aCGH and next generation sequencing (NGS) both before and after NAC. Methods The Breast Cancer Genome Guided Therapy Study (BEAUTY) (NCT 02022202) is a prospective study of patients with high-risk breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant 12 weekly paclitaxel (T) +/- trastuzumab followed by 4 cycles of anthracycline based chemotherapy. Tumor tissue from baseline, residual disease from surgery, distant metastases, and patient derived xenografts (PDX) are obtained for cell sorting by DNA ploidy, aCGH, RNA and exome sequencing. Results: 140 patients have been enrolled, 104 have completed surgery and 30 unique PDX have been established corresponding to 26 patients prior to chemotherapy and 4 from residual disease at surgery. Baseline exome and RNA sequencing is complete in 140. Currently, genomic analyses of flow sorted matched baseline, surgical, PDX, and distant disease samples are available in 6 patients. Substantial genomic variation was observed in the surgical sample compared to the primary tumor including gain of oncogenic drivers (EGFR) and loss of negative regulators (ATG5) (Table). The PDX recapitulated these events with excellent fidelity compared to the corresponding human tumor. In patients with TNBC, RNA seq obained from matched samples demonstrated changes in immune related pathways. Evaluation of drug targets/pathways identified in the resistant tumors are ongoing using the PDX and sequencing of the remaining matched baseline/surgical disease will be reported. Clonal changes occurring over time in patients with residual disease or disease recurrence after NACTumor SubtypeResidual Cancer BurdenDisease StatusClonal Aberration Changes (baseline and post NAC)TNBC (AR subtype)3Contralateral lymph node recurrence at 150 days2p25.2 - p25.1 amplicon lost at recurrence; 6p21.32 -p21.31 amplicon lost at recurrenceTNBC (BL 1)3Bone/liver/lymph node recurrence at 135 days5q11.2 amplicon gained at surgery; 12p13.33 - p13.2 amplicon gained at surgeryTNBC (BL 1)3Disease-free at day 1506q21 amplicon lost at sugeryTNBC (BL 2)0Brain recurrence at 390 daysChr 2 chromothripsis at surgeryLuminal B3Progression during chemotherapy7p12.1 - p11.2 amplicon gained at surgeryLuminal HER23Disease-free at day 3609q33.2 amplicon lost at surgery; 15q13.1 - q13.3 amplicon lost at surgery; 15q22.2 - q24.1 amplicon lost at surgery Conclusions: We observed substantial evolutionary changes in residual breast tumors remaining after NAC. Our findings suggest that a comprehensive assessment of the mutational landscape that has evolved during NAC can inform drug development in high risk breast cancer patients. Citation Format: Matthew P Goetz, Michael T Barrett, Krishna R Kalari, Vera J Suman, Sarah A McLaughlin, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Ann M Moyer, Donald W Northfelt, Richard J Gray, Jason Sinnwell, Douglas Mahoney, Poulami Barman, Peter Vedell, Xiaojia Tang, Kevin Thompson, Travis Dockter, Katie Jones, Sara J Felten, Amy Conners, Jeanette Eckel-Passow, Hughes Sicotte, Steven N Hart, Jia Yu, Daniel W Visscher, Eric D Wieben, Cloann Schultz, Minetta C Liu, James N Ingle, Liewei Wang, Richard W Weinshilboum, Judy C Boughey. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the clonal composition of breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-3.
Is mastectomy undertreatment for low‐risk breast cancers eligible for breast‐conserving therapy?
Wasif, Nabil , Rawal, Bhupendra, McLaughlin, Sarah A., Giuliano, Armando E. , Bagaria, Sanjay P.

Cancer | April 28, 2015 | Volume: 121 | Issue: 16 | Pages: 2705-2712

10.1002/cncr.29416 Get It

BACKGROUNDBiomarkers are routinely used to predict responses to systemic therapies, but their utility for predicting responses to local therapy for breast cancer is not known. This study determined whether biomarkers could predict responses to breast‐conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy.METHODSA review of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database identified women diagnosed with early‐stage invasive ductal breast cancer and treated with BCT or mastectomy from 1998 to 2008. The estrogen receptor (ER) status and the histologic grade were used to construct 3 biomarker profiles: low risk (ER‐positive, low/intermediate grade), intermediate risk (ER‐positive, high grade), and high risk (ER‐negative, any grade). The primary measured outcome was disease‐specific survival (DSS).RESULTSBCT and mastectomy were performed in 114,486 patients (59.2%) and 79,035 patients (40.8%), respectively. There were 122,420 low‐risk patients (63.3%), 34,341 intermediate‐risk patients (17.7%), and 36,760 high‐risk patients (19.0%). Multivariate analyses were performed separately for patients with low‐, intermediate‐, and high‐risk tumors. The adjusted hazard ratios for DSS for patients who underwent mastectomy versus BCT for low‐, intermediate‐, and high‐risk tumors were 1.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54‐1.79; P < .001), 1.40 (95% CI, 1.29‐1.53; P < .001), and 1.27 (95% CI, 1.19‐1.35; P < .001), respectively.CONCLUSIONSPatients with ER‐positive, low‐grade breast cancers who underwent mastectomy had a 66% increase in disease‐specific mortality versus those who underwent BCT. Biomarker profiles defined by the ER status and grade may improve the selection of local therapy for breast cancer. Cancer 2015;121:2705‐2712. © 2015 American Cancer Society
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
Lee, Richard J. , Vallow, Laura A., McLaughlin, Sarah A., Tzou, Katherine S., Hines, Stephanie L., Peterson, Jennifer

International Journal of Surgical Oncology | July 19, 2012 | Volume: 2012 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-12

10.1155/2012/123549 Get It

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast represents a complex, heterogeneous pathologic condition in which malignant epithelial cells are confined within the ducts of the breast without evidence of invasion. The increased use of screening mammography has led to a significant shift in the diagnosis of DCIS, accounting for approximately 27% of all newly diagnosed cases of breast cancer in 2011, with an overall increase in incidence. As the incidence of DCIS increases, the treatment options continue to evolve. Consistent pathologic evaluation is crucial in optimizing treatment recommendations. Surgical treatment options include breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. Postoperative radiation therapy in combination with breast-conserving surgery is considered the standard of care with demonstrated decrease in local recurrence with the addition of radiation therapy. The role of endocrine therapy is currently being evaluated. The optimization of diagnostic imaging, treatment with regard to pathological risk assessment, and the role of partial breast irradiation continue to evolve.
The Role of Preoperative Bilateral Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patient Selection for Partial Breast Irradiation in Ductal CarcinomaIn Situ
Kowalchik, Kristin, Vallow, Laura A., McDonough, Michelle, Thomas, Colleen S. , Peterson, Jennifer , Adkisson, Cameron D., Serago, Christopher F., Buskirk, Steven J., McLaughlin, Sarah A., Heckman, Michael G.

International Journal of Surgical Oncology | May 13, 2012 | Volume: 2012 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-6

10.1155/2012/206342 Get It

Purpose. Women with ductal carcinomain situ(DCIS) are often candidates for breast-conserving therapy, and one option for radiation treatment is partial breast irradiation (PBI). This study evaluates the use of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for PBI selection in DCIS patients.Methods. Between 2002 and 2009, 136 women with newly diagnosed DCIS underwent a preoperative bilateral breast MRI at Mayo Clinic in Florida. One hundred seventeen women were deemed eligible for PBI by the NSABP B-39 (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Protocol B-39) inclusion criteria using physical examination, mammogram, and/or ultrasound. MRIs were reviewed for their impact on patient eligibility, and findings were pathologically confirmed.Results. Of the 117 patients, 23 (20%) were found ineligible because of pathologically proven MRI findings. MRI detected additional ipsilateral breast cancer in 21 (18%) patients. Of these women, 15 (13%) had more extensive disease than originally noted before MRI, and 6 (5%) had multicentric disease in the ipsilateral breast. In addition, contralateral breast cancer was detected in 4 (4%).Conclusions. Preoperative breast MRI altered the PBI recommendations for 20% of women. Bilateral breast MRI should be an integral part of the preoperative evaluation of all patients with DCIS being considered for PBI.
Detection of Redundant Fusion Transcripts as Biomarkers or Disease-Specific Therapeutic Targets in Breast Cancer
Asmann, Yan W. , Necela, Brian M. , Kalari, Krishna R. , Hossain, Asif, Baker, Tiffany R., Carr, Jennifer M., Davis, Caroline , Getz, Julie E., McLaughlin, Sarah A., Schroth, Gary P. , Cunliffe, Heather E. , Perez, Edith A. , Thompson, E. Aubrey , Hostetter, Galen H. , Li, Xing , Radisky, Derek C. , Kalari, Krishna R

Cancer Research | April 10, 2012 | Volume: 72 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1921-1928

10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-3142 Get It

Abstract Fusion genes and fusion gene products are widely employed as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in hematopoietic cancers, but their applications have yet to be appreciated in solid tumors. Here, we report the use of SnowShoes-FTD, a powerful new analytic pipeline that can identify fusion transcripts and assess their redundancy and tumor subtype-specific distribution in primary tumors. In a study of primary breast tumors, SnowShoes-FTD was used to analyze paired-end mRNA-Seq data from a panel of estrogen receptor (ER)+, HER2+, and triple-negative primary breast tumors, identifying tumor-specific fusion transcripts by comparison with mRNA-Seq data from nontransformed human mammary epithelial cell cultures plus the Illumina Body Map data from normal tissues. We found that every primary breast tumor that was analyzed expressed one or more fusion transcripts. Of the 131 tumor-specific fusion transcripts identified, 86 were “private” (restricted to a single tumor) and 45 were “redundant” (distributed among multiple tumors). Among the redundant fusion transcripts, 7 were unique to ER+ tumors and 8 were unique to triple-negative tumors. In contrast, none of the redundant fusion transcripts were unique to HER2+ tumors. Both private and redundant fusion transcripts were widely expressed in primary breast tumors, with many mapping to genomic loci implicated in breast carcinogenesis and/or risk. Our finding that some fusion transcripts are tumor subtype-specific suggests that these entities may be critical determinants in the etiology of breast cancer subtypes, useful as biomarkers for tumor stratification, or exploitable as cancer-specific therapeutic targets. Cancer Res; 72(8); 1921–8. ©2012 AACR.